This work aimed to engineer a multi-station shoulder simulator in order to wear test shoulder prostheses using recognized shoulder activities of daily living. A bespoke simulator was designed, built and subject to commissioning trials before a first wear test was conducted. Five JRI Orthopaedics Reverse Shoulder VAIOS 42 mm prostheses were tested for 2.0 million cycles and a mean wear rate and standard deviation of 14.2 ± 2.1 mm3/106 cycles measured for the polymeric glenoid components. This result when adjusted for prostheses diameters and test conditions showed excellent agreement with results from hip simulator studies of similar materials in a lubricant of bovine serum. The Newcastle Shoulder Simulator is the first multi-station shoulder simulator capable of applying physiological motion and loading for typical activities of daily living.
WirthMAAgrawalCMMabreyJD. Isolation and characterization of polyethylene wear debris associated with osteolysis following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am1999; 81(1): 95–100.
MurrayIAJohnsonGR. A study of the external forces and moments at the shoulder and elbow while performing every day tasks. Clin Biomech2004; 19: 586–594.
9.
VaupelZMBakerKCKurdzielMD. Wear simulation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems: effect of glenosphere design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2012; 21: 1422–1429.
10.
KohutGDallmannFIrlenbuschU. Wear-induced loss of mass in reversed total shoulder arthroplasty with conventional and inverted bearing materials. J Biomech2012; 45: 469–473.
11.
WirthMAKlotzCDeffenbaughDL. Cross-linked glenoid prosthesis: a wear comparison to conventional glenoid prosthesis with wear particulate analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2009; 18: 130–137.
12.
MullerDMartiAHerzigP. Year Evaluation of PEEK for shoulder endoprosthetics in a screening and a simulated physiological wear test. In: 47th annual meeting, orthopaedic research society, San Francisco, CA, 25–28 February 2001.
13.
PijlAJSwieszkowskiWBerseeHEN. Technical application series: design of a wear simulator for in vitro shoulder prostheses testing. Exp Tech2004; 28: 45–48.
14.
SwieszkowskiWBerseeHENKurzydlowskiKJ. Effect of the design parameters on the in vitro wear performance of total shoulder arthroplasties. Mater Sci Eng C2011; 31: 313–319.
15.
GearyCO’DonnellGEJonesE. Automated in-vitro testing of orthopaedic implants: a case study in shoulder joint replacement. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2010; 224: 1297–1309.
16.
ISO14242-1:2000. Implants for surgery – wear of total hip joint prostheses, part 1. Loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines and corresponding environmental conditions for test (Geneva: ISO).
17.
PaulJP. Forces transmitted by joints in the human body. Eng Med1967; 181(37): 8–15.
18.
SmithSLUnsworthA. Simplified motion and loading compared to physiological motion and loading in a hip joint simulator. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2000; 214(3): 233–238.
19.
BarbourPSMStoneMHFisherJ. A hip joint simulator study using simplified loading and motion cycles generating physiological wear paths and rates. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine1999; 213: 455–467.
20.
ISO14242-2:2000. Implants for surgery – wear of total hip joint prostheses, part 2. Methods of measurement (Geneva: ISO).
21.
CharltonIWJohnsonGR. A model for the prediction of the forces at the glenohumeral joint. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2006; 220: 801–812.
22.
KontaxisA. Biomechanical analysis of reverse anatomy shoulder prosthesis. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University, 2010.
23.
LiaoYSMcKellopHALuZ. The effect of frictional heating and forced cooling on the serum lubricant and wear of UHMW polyethylene cups against cobalt-chromium and zirconia balls. Biomater2003; 24: 3047–3059.
24.
SaikkoV. A hip wear simulator with 100 test stations. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2005; 219: 309–318.
25.
DowsonDJobbinsB. Design and development of a versatile hip joint simulator and a preliminary assessment of the wear and creep in Charnley total replacement hip joints. Eng Med1988; 17(3): 111–117.
26.
ClarkeICGoodVAnissianL. Charnley wear model for validation of hip simulators – ball diameter versus polytetrafluoroethylene and polyethylene wear. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine1997; 211(1): 25–36.
27.
BurgessICKolarMCunninghamJL. Development of a six station knee wear simulator and preliminary wear results. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine1997; 211(1): 37–47.
28.
SmithSLBurgessICUnsworthA. Evaluation of a hip joint simulator. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine1999; 213(6): 469–473.
29.
GoldsmithAAJDowsonD. A multi-station hip joint simulator study of the performance of 22mm diameter zirconia – UHMWPE total replacement joints. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine1999; 213(2): 77–90.
30.
SmithSLUnsworthA. A 5 station hip joint simulator. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2001; 215(1): 61–64.
31.
BarnettPIMcEwenHMJAugerDD. Investigation of wear of knee prostheses in a new displacement/force-controlled simulator. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2002; 216: 51–61.
32.
JoyceTJUnsworthA. The design of a finger wear simulator and preliminary results. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2000; 214: 519–526.
33.
KontaxisAJohnsonGR. The biomechanics of reverse anatomy shoulder replacement – A modelling study. Clin Biomech2009; 24: 254–260.
GoodVClarkeIAnissian. Water and bovine serum lubrication compared in simulator PTFE/CoCr wear model. J Biomed Mater Res1996; 33: 275–283.
36.
McNultyDESwopeSWDeffenbaughD. In-vitro wear testing of total shoulder prostheses using conventional and crosslinked polyethylene. In: Society for biomaterials 30th annual meeting transactions, Memphis, TN, 27–30 April 2005, pp.701–703.
37.
O’KellyJUnsworthADowsonD. An experimental study of friction and lubrication in hip prostheses. Eng Med1979; 8(3): 153–159.
38.
UnsworthAScholesSCSmithSL. Tribology of replacement hip joints. Tribology S2000; 38: 195–202.
39.
LancasterJK. Dry bearings: a survey of materials and factors affecting their performance. Tribology1973; 6: 219–251.
40.
WalpoleSCPrieto-MerinoDEdwardsP. The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass. BMC Public Health2012; 12(1): 439.
41.
BarbourPSMStoneMHFisherJ. A hip joint simulator study using new and physiologically scratched femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2000; 214: 569–576.
42.
SmithSLUnsworthA. A comparison between gravimetric and volumetric techniques of wear measurement of UHMWPE acetabular cups against zirconia and CoCrMo femoral heads in a hip simulator. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine1999; 213(6): 475–483.
43.
WangAStarkCDumbletonJH. Mechanistic and morphological origins of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris in total joint replacement prostheses. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine1996; 210: 141–155.
44.
GoodVDClarkeICGustafsonGA. Wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene and polytetrafluoroethylene in a hip simulator. Acta Orthop Scand2000; 71: 365–369.
