Biomechanical testing of an innovative fixation procedure to stabilize olecranon osteotomy

Abstract

For the treatment of distal humerus an approach involving olecranon osteotomy is frequently preferred as it offers a clearer view, especially in cases of complex intraarticular fractures. It is however associated with the high risk of osteotomy-related complications such as nonunion, delayed healing, implant failure and migration of wires. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stability of different new procedures that stabilize olecranon osteotomy compared with conventional tension band wiring. We hypothesize that the new implants provide equivalent stability as the conventional tension band wiring. To test the hypothesis 27 biomechanically evaluated synthetic ulnae were osteotomized and stabilized with either the application of tension band wiring, the Olecranon Hook LCP (Synthes, Switzerland), or the Olecranon Osteotomy nail (Synthes, Switzerland). Loading was performed providing a tensile load to simulate the tensile force applied by the triceps muscle. Cyclic force-controlled loading was performed at 300 alternating forces between 10N and 500N at a speed of 200N/sec. An ultrasound-based system measured displacement to an accuracy of 0.1 mm. Statistical analysis showed significantly less displacement in the Olecranon Hook LCP and Olecranon Osteotomy nail groups compared with tension banding. Comparison of plate and nail yielded no differences in stability. Biomechanical testing did however show significantly higher stability for newer fixation methods for olecranon osteotomies compared with the frequently applied technique of tension band wiring. Whether the use of these implants will also lower complication rates remains to be evaluated in future clinical studies.

Level of evidence: Basic Science Study, Biomechanical Study.

Keywords

Olecranon osteotomy biomechanical tension band wiring hook plate osteotomy nail

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Doornberg

van Duijn

Linzel

. Surgical treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal part of the humerus. Functional outcome after twelve to thirty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(7): 1524–1532.

Cobb

Morrey

. Total elbow arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79(6): 826–832.

Coles

Barei

Nork

. The olecranon osteotomy: a six-year experience in the treatment of intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 2006; 20(3): 164–171.

McKee

Kim

Kebaish

. Functional outcome after open supracondylar fractures of the humerus. The effect of the surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82(5): 646–651.

Bryan

Morrey

. Extensive posterior exposure of the elbow. A triceps-sparing approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982; 166: 188–192.

Cassebaum

. Operative treatment of T and Y fractures of the lower end of the humerus. Am J Surg 1952; 83(3): 265–270.

Henley

. Intra-articular distal humeral fractures in adults. Orthop Clin North Am 1987; 18(1): 11–23.

Robinson

Hill

RMF

Jacobs

. Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma 2003; 17(1): 38–47.

Reising

Hauschild

Strohm

. Stabilisation of articular fractures of the distal humerus: early experience with a novel perpendicular plate system. Injury 2009; 40(6): 611–617.

10.

Weber

Vasey

. Osteosynthesis in olecranon fractures. Z Unfallmed Berufskr 1963; 56: 90–96.

11.

Müller

Allgöwer

Schneider

. Manual of internal fixation. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg; New York: Springer, 1979.

12.

Hewins

Gofton

Dubberly

. Plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21(1): 58–62.

13.

Lewicky

Sheppard

Ruth

. Olecranon osteotomy repair: the tensioned locking plate technique. Orthopedics 2008; 31(6): 565–569.

14.

Nowak

Mueller

Sternstein

. Dynamic analysis of olecranon osteosyntheses—an in vitro comparison of two osteosynthesis systems. Biomed Tech 2008; 53(2): 86–90.

15.

Kozin

Berglund

Cooney

. Biomechanical analysis of tension band fixation for olecranon fracture treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5(6): 442–448.

16.

Lalonde

Rabalais

Mansour

. New tension band material for fixation of transverse olecranon fractures: a biomechanical study. Orthopedics 2005; 28(10): 1191–1194.

17.

Koslowsky

Mader

Dargel

. Olecranon fracture fixation with a new implant: biomechanical and clinical considerations. Injury 2009; 40(6): 618–624.

18.

Molloy

Jasper

Elliott

. Biomechanical evaluation of intramedullary nail versus tension band fixation for transverse olecranon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18(3): 170–174.

19.

Konstantinidis

Papaioannou

Hirschmuller

. Effects of muscle-equivalent forces on the biomechanical behavior of proximal femur fracture models: a pilot study on artificial bones. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2012; 226(9): 681–685.

20.

Ring

Gulotta

Chin

. Olecranon osteotomy for exposure of fractures and nonunions of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18(7): 446–449.

21.

Wilkinson

Stanley

. Posterior surgical approaches to the elbow: a comparative anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10(4): 380–382.

22.

Ljungquist

Beran

Awan

. Effects of surgical approach on functional outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21(1): 126–135.

23.

Jupiter

. Trauma to the adult elbow. In: Browner

Jupiter

Levine

(eds) Skeletal trauma. Vol 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992, pp.1125–1176.

24.

Karlsson

Hasserius

Besjakov

. Comparison of tension-band and figure-of-eight wiring techniques for treatment of olecranon fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1979; 11(4): 377–382.

25.

Villanueva

Osorio

Commessatti

. Tension-band wiring for olecranon fractures: analysis of risk factors for failure. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15(3): 351–356.

26.

Helm

Hornby

Miller

. The complications of surgical treatment of displaced fractures of the olecranon. Injury 1987; 18(1): 48–50.

27.

Sané

Dakouré

Diémé

. Olecranon osteotomy in the treatment of distal humeral fractures in adults: anatomical and functional evaluation of the elbow in 14 cases. Chir Main 2009; 28(2): 93–98.

28.

Schmidt-Horlohé

Wilde

Bonk

. One-third tubular-hook-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon osteotomies in distal humerus type-C fractures: a preliminary report of results and complications. Injury 2012; 43(3): 295–300.

29.

Fyfe

Mossad

Holdsworth

. Methods of fixation of olecranon fractures. An experimental mechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67(3): 367–372.

30.

Tejwani

Garnham

Wolinsky

. Posterior olecranon plating: biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a new operative technique. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2003; 61: 27–31.

31.

Murphy

Greene

Gilbert

. Displaced olecranon fractures in adults. Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 224: 210–214.

32.

Hutchinson

Horwitz

. Cyclic loading of olecranon fracture fixation constructs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85(5): 831–837.

33.

Rüedi

Buckley

Moran

. AO principles of fracture management. 2nd ed. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 2007.

34.

Buijze

Blankevoort

Tuijthof

GJM

. Biomechanical evaluation of fixation of comminuted olecranon fractures: one-third tubular versus locking compression plating. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130(4): 459–464.

35.

Argintar

Martin

Singer

. A biomechanical comparison of multidirectional nail and locking plate fixation in unstable olecranon fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21(10): 1398–1405.

36.

Wang

Mara

Hutchinson

. The proximal ulna: an anatomic study with relevance to olecranon osteotomy and fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003; 12(3): 293–296.

37.

Landsman

Chang

. Can synthetic bone models approximate the mechanical properties of cadaveric first metatarsal bone? J Foot Ankle Surg 1998; 37(2): 122–127.