Treating fractures of the spine is a major challenge for the medical community with an estimated 1.4 million fractures per annum worldwide. While a considerable volume of study exists on the biomechanical implications of balloon kyphoplasty, which is used to treat these fractures, the influence of the compacted bone–cement region properties on stress distribution within the vertebral body remains unknown. The following article describes a novel method for modelling this compacted bone–cement region using a geometry-based approach in conjunction with the knowledge of the bone volume fractions for the native and compacted bone regions. Three variables for the compacted region were examined, as follows: (1) compacted thickness, (2) compacted region Young’s modulus and (3) friction coefficient. Results from the model indicate that the properties of the compacted bone–cement region can affect stresses in the cortical bone and cement by up to +28% and −40%, respectively. These findings demonstrate the need for further investigation into the effects of the compacted bone–cement interface using computational and experimental methods on multi-segment models.
JohnellOKanisJA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int2006; 17(12): 1726–1733.
2.
DenisF. Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res1984; (189): 65–76.
3.
LenehanBBoranSStreetJ. Demographics of acute admissions to a National Spinal Injuries Unit. Eur Spine J2009; 18(7): 938–942.
4.
Van der RoerNBruyneMCBakkerFC. Direct medical costs of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures. Acta orthop2005; 76(5): 662–666.
5.
BlondelBFuentesSPech-GourgG. Percutaneous management of thoracolumbar burst fractures: evolution of techniques and strategy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2011; 97(5): 527–532.
6.
KhannaAJLeeSVillarragaM. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement in a 2-functional spinal unit vertebral compression fracture model. Spine J2008; 8(5): 770–777.
7.
TomitaSMolloySJasperLE. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements. Spine2004; 29(11): 1203–1207.
8.
BelkoffSMMathisJMFentonDC. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture. Spine2001; 26(2): 151–156.
9.
ChenBLiYXieD. Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty on the stiffness and biomechanical balance of compression fractured vertebrae. Eur Spine J2011; 20(8): 1272–1280.
10.
KrügerAOberkircherLKratzM. Cement interdigitation and bone-cement interface after augmenting fractured vertebrae: a cadaveric study. Int J Spine Surg2012; 6(1): 115–123.
11.
BevillGEasleySKKeavenyTM. Side-artifact errors in yield strength and elastic modulus for human trabecular bone and their dependence on bone volume fraction and anatomic site. J Biomech2007; 40(15): 3381–3388.
12.
HarrisonNMMcHughPE. Comparison of trabecular bone behavior in core and whole bone samples using high-resolution modeling of a vertebral body. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2010; 9(4): 469–480.
13.
McDonnellPHarrisonNLohfeldS. Investigation of the mechanical interaction of the trabecular core with an external shell using rapid prototype and finite element models. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2010; 3(1): 63–76.
14.
HigginsKBSindallDRCuitinoAM. Biomechanical alterations in intact osteoporotic spine due to synthetic augmentation: finite element investigation. J Biomech Eng2007; 129(4): 575–585.
15.
McDonaldKA. An experimental and finite element investigation of the biomechanics of vertebral compression fractures. PhD Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 2009.
16.
BaroudGNemesJHeiniP. Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study. Eur Spine J2003; 12(4): 421–426.
17.
DabirrahmaniDBeckerSHoggM. Mechanical variables affecting balloon kyphoplasty outcome – a finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin2011; 15(3): 211–220.
18.
LiYLewisG. Finite element analysis of a model of simulated vertebral cement augmentation: influence of the representation of the shape of the cement domain on biomechanical parameters. J Mech Med Biol2010; 10(2): 291–311.
19.
LiYLewisG. Influence of loading cycle profile and frequency on a biomechanical parameter of a model of a balloon kyphoplasty-augmented lumbar spine segment: a finite element analysis study. Biomed Mater Eng2010; 20(6): 349–359.
20.
WilcoxRK. The biomechanical effect of vertebroplasty on the adjacent vertebral body: a finite element study. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2006; 220(4): 565–572.
21.
WijayathungaVNJonesACOaklandRJ. Development of specimen-specific finite element models of human vertebrae for the analysis of vertebroplasty. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2008; 222(2): 221–228.
22.
BaroudGYahiaFB. A finite element rheological model for polymethylmethacrylate flow: analysis of the cement delivery in vertebroplasty. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2004; 218(5): 331–338.
23.
ChaeS-WKangHDLeeMK. The effect of vertebral material description during vertebroplasty. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2010; 224(1): 87–95.
24.
ZhaoYRobson BrownKAJinZM. Trabecular level analysis of bone cement augmentation: a comparative experimental and finite element study. Ann Biomed Eng2012; 40(10): 2168–2176.
25.
RaceAMannKAEdidinAA. Mechanics of bone/PMMA composite structures: an in vitro study of human vertebrae. J Biomech2007; 40(5): 1002–1010.
26.
VillarragaLMCriptonPABellezzaAJ. Stress levels in bones and bone cement in the thoracolumbar spine afer kyphoplasty. Finite element study. Orthopade2004; 33(1): 48–55.
27.
AppleyardRBaroudGGilliesM. Disadvantages of balloon kyphoplasty with PMMA – a clinical and biomechanical statement. Miner Metab2011; 18(1): 9–12.
28.
KimKHSKuhSUParkJY. What is the importance of ‘halo’ phenomenon around bone cement following vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic compression fracture?Osteoporosis Int2012; 23(10): 2559–2565.
29.
WilkeH-JMehnertUClaesLE. Biomechanical evaluation of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cement under cyclic loading. Spine2006; 31(25): 2934–2941.
30.
KimMJLindseyDPHannibalM. Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: biomechanical behavior under repetitive loading conditions. Spine2006; 31(18): 2079–2084.
31.
LeungSYNewAMBrowneM. The use of complementary non-destructive evaluation methods to evaluate the integrity of the cement–bone interface. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2009; 223(1): 75–87.
32.
WaandersDJanssenDMannKA. The effect of cement creep and cement fatigue damage on the micromechanics of the cement-bone interface. J Biomech2010; 43(15): 3028–3034.
33.
MannKMillerMARaceA. Shear fatigue micromechanics of the cement-bone interface: an in vitro study using digital image correlation techniques. J Orthop Res2009; 27(3): 340–346.
34.
MannKAMillerMAClearyRJ. Experimental micromechanics of the cement-bone interface. J Orthop Res2008; 26(6): 872–879.
35.
MillerMARaceAWaandersD. Multi-axial loading micromechanics of the cement-bone interface in postmortem retrievals and lab-prepared specimens. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2011; 4(3): 366–374.
36.
NuñoNMadralaAPlamondonD. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants. J Biomech2008; 41(12): 2605–2611.
37.
HungJ-PChangF-C. Computational modeling of debonding behavior at the bone/cement interface with experimental validation. Mater Sci Eng C2010; 30(3): 445–453.
38.
TozziGZhangQ-HTongJ. 3D real-time micromechanical compressive behaviour of bone-cement interface: experimental and finite element studies. J Biomech2012; 45(2): 356–363.
39.
WaandersDJanssenDMannKA. Morphology based cohesive zone modeling of the cement-bone interface from postmortem retrievals. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2011; 4(7): 1492–1503.
40.
KellyNMcGarryJP. Experimental and numerical characterisation of the elasto-plastic properties of bovine trabecular bone and a trabecular bone analogue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2012; 9: 184–197.
41.
ZhaoYJinZMWilcoxRK. Modelling cement augmentation: a comparative experimental and finite element study at the continuum level. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2010; 224(7): 903–911.
42.
TyndykMBarronVMcHughPE. Generation of a finite element model of the thoracolumbar spine. Acta Bioeng Biomech2007; 9(1): 35–46.
43.
FribourgDTangCSraP. Incidence of subsequent vertebral fracture after kyphoplasty. Spine2004; 29(20): 2270–2276.
44.
MaestrettiGCremerCOttenP. Prospective study of standalone balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement augmentation in traumatic fractures. Eur Spine J2007; 16(5): 601–610.
45.
HartmannFGercekELeinerL. Kyphoplasty as an alternative treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures Magerl type A3. Injury2012; 43(4): 409–415.
46.
TyndykM. Finite element modelling of the mechanical behavior of the thoracolumbar spine. PhD Thesis, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, 2005.
Viguet-CarrinSFolletHGineytsE. Association between collagen cross-links and trabecular microarchitecture properties of human vertebral bone. Bone2010; 46(2): 342–347.
49.
DickeyBTTyndykMADomanDA. In silico evaluation of stress distribution after vertebral body augmentation with conventional acrylics, composites and glass polyalkenoate cements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2012; 5(1): 283–290.
50.
JanssenDMannKAVerdonschotN. Finite element simulation of cement-bone interface micromechanics; a comparison to experimental results. J Orthop Res2010; 27(10): 1312–1318.
51.
KinzlMBogerAZyssetPK. The mechanical behavior of PMMA/bone specimens extracted from augmented vertebrae: a numerical study of interface properties, PMMA shrinkage and trabecular bone damage. J Biomech2012; 45(8): 1478–1484.
