Distal stem features improve the torsional resistance of long-stem cemented revision hip stems: An in vitro biomechanical study

Abstract

When proximal bone stock is compromised at revision hip arthroplasty, distal fixation is often relied upon for stability of the femoral component. In such circumstances, torsional forces can result in debonding and loosening. This study compared the torsional behaviour of a cemented, polished and featureless (plain) stem with cemented, polished stems featuring fins or flutes. The finned stem construct was found to be significantly stiffer than the fluted stem. The maximum torque of the finned and fluted stems was significantly higher than the plain stem, with no difference between the finned and fluted stems. Distal stem features may provide a more reliable and greater resistance to torque in polished, cemented revision hip stems. Finned stem features may also increase the stiffness of the construct.

Keywords

Revision hip arthroplasty replacement torsion torsional stability stem design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rydell

. Forces acting on the femoral head-prosthesis. A study on strain gauge supplied prostheses in living persons. Acta Orthop Scand 1966; 37(Suppl. 88): 1–132.

Bergmann

Deuretzbacher

Heller

. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001; 34(7): 859–871.

Kotzar

Davy

Berilla

. Torsional loads in the early postoperative period following total hip replacement. J Orthop Res 1995; 13(6): 945–955.

Dayton

Incavo

. Component loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty 2005; 16: 161–170.

Hungerford

Jones

. The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 235: 12–24.

Poss

Walker

Spector

. Strategies for improving fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 235: 181–194.

D’Antonio

Capello

Borden

. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 243: 126–137.

Murphy

Rodriguez

. Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(4 Suppl. 1): 115–119.

Nunn

Freeman

Tanner

. Torsional stability of the femoral component of hip arthroplasty. Response to an anteriorly applied load. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71(3): 452–455.

10.

Kendrick

II Noble

Tullos

. Distal stem design and the torsional stability of cementless femoral stems. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10(4): 463–469.

11.

Kedgley

Takaki

Lang

. The effect of cross-sectional stem shape on the torsional stability of cemented implant components. J Biomech Eng 2007; 129(3): 310–314.

12.

Gie

Linder

Ling

. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75(1): 14–21.

13.

Meneghini

Hallab

Berger

. Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2006; 1: 5.

14.

Thomson

Lee

. Torsional stability of a polished, collarless, tapered total replacement hip joint stem under vertical load: an in vitro investigation. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2011; 225(1): 77–85.