Foot drop is a disease caused mainly by muscle paralysis, which incapacitates the nerves generating the impulses that control feet in a heel strike. The incapacity may stem from lesions that affect the brain, the spinal cord, or peripheral nerves. The foot becomes dorsiflexed, affecting normal walking. A design and analysis of a controller for such legs is the subject of this article. Surface electromyography electrodes are connected to the skin surface of the human muscle and work on the mechanics of human muscle contraction. The design uses real surface electromyography signals for estimation of the joint angles. Various-speed flexions and extensions of the leg were analyzed. The two phases of the design began with surface electromyography of real human leg electromyography signal, which was subsequently filtered, amplified, and normalized to the maximum amplitude. Parameters extracted from the surface electromyography signal were then used to train an artificial neural network for prediction of the joint angle. The artificial neural network design included various-speed identification of the electromyography signal and estimation of the angles of the knee and ankle joints by a recognition process that depended on the parameters of the real surface electromyography signal measured through real movements. The second phase used artificial neural network estimation of the control signal, for calculation of the electromyography signal to be stimulated for the leg muscle to move the ankle joint. Satisfactory simulation (MATLAB/Simulink version 2012a) and implementation results verified the design feasibility.
AndreausUCollocaM. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2009; 223(5): 589–605.
2.
RoetenbergD. Inertial and magnetic sensing of human. PHD Thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands, 2006.
3.
PappasIPIPopovicMRKellerT. A reliable gait phase detection system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2001; 9(2): 113–126.
4.
WehnerM. Man to machine applications in electromyography. In: EMG methods for evaluating muscle and nerve function, vol. 22. 2012, pp.427–454.
5.
KappelSLRathleffMSHermannD. A novel method for measuring in-shoe navicular drop during gait. Sensors2012; 12: 11697–11711.
6.
SteinRBRolfREveraertDG. Surface electrical stimulation for foot drop: control aspects and walking performance. J Autom Control2008; 18(2): 47–52.
7.
OllingerGAColgateJEPeshkinMA. A 1-DOF assistive exoskeleton with inertia compensation: effects on the agility of leg swing motion. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2011; 225(3): 228–245.
8.
BlanchetteALambertSRichardsCL. Walking while resisting a perturbation: effects on ankle dorsiflexor activation during swing and potential for rehabilitation. Gait Posture2011; 34(3): 358–363.
9.
ShoureshiRA. Development of advanced active haptic system for musculoskeleton–exoskeleton interactions. Report, School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Denver, Denver, CO, August2005.
10.
OllingerGAColgateJEPeshkinMA. A one-degree-of-freedom assistive exoskeleton with inertia compensation: the effects on the agility of leg swing motion. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2011; 225(3): 228–245.
11.
MillerJMAstlesRBaszlerT. Guidelines for safe work practices in human and animal medical diagnostic laboratories. Suppl. 61, 2012. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pp.1–105.
12.
AndreausUCollocaMIacovielloD. Modeling of trabecular architecture as result of an optimal control procedure. In: Biomedical imaging and computational modeling in biomechanics (lecture notes in computational vision and biomechanics), vol. 4. 2013, pp.19–37.
13.
SteinRBPhilDChongSL. A multicenter trial of a foot drop stimulator controlled by a tilt sensor. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2006; 20(3): 371–379.
14.
DuvinageMCastermansTFabianRJ. Human walk modeled by PCPG to control a lower limb neuroprosthesis by high-level commands. In: 5th international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering (NER), 2011, pp.317–321.
15.
ChinRWeckslerETLothE. A pneumatic power harvesting ankle-foot orthosis to prevent foot-drop. J Neuroeng Rehabil2009; 6(19): 1–11.
16.
JamshidiNRostamiMNajarianS. Modelling of human walking to optimise the function of ankle-foot orthosis in Guillain-Barré patients with drop foot. Singapore Med J2009; 50(4): 412–417.
17.
RamyaSRajalakshmiT. EMG-triggered functional electrical stimulation—a novel method to correct foot drop. In: International conference on computing and control engineering (ICCCE), 2012, pp.1–4.
18.
WeinbergBNikitczukJPatelS. Control and human testing of an active knee rehabilitation orthotic device. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom2007; 2: 1–8.
19.
ThompsonAKSteinRBChenXY. Modulation in spinal circuits and corticospinal connections following nerve stimulation and operant conditioning. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE, EMBS annual international conference, 2006, vol. 2, pp.2138–2141.
20.
TanidaSKikuchiTKakehashiT. Intelligently controllable ankle foot orthosis (I-AFO) and its application for a patient of Guillain-Barre syndrome. In: IEEE 11th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2009, pp.857–862.
21.
ChenSWChenSCChenCF. A pelvic motion driven electrical stimulator for drop-foot treatment. In: 31st annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2009, pp.666–670.
22.
WebeDJSteinRBChanKM. BIONic WalkAide for correcting foot drop. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2005; 13(2): 242–246.
23.
MiuraNWatanabeTAkasakaK. A clinical trial of a prototype of wireless surface FES rehabilitation system in foot drop correction. In: 33rd annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2011, pp.5461–5464.
24.
RaiJKTewariRPChandraD. An optimal control of bio-robotic leg for human like walking. In: International conference on industrial electronics, IEEE international conference on industrial electronics, control and robotics, 2010, pp.18–22.
25.
YangWZ. Wearable power assisted pneumatic–based ankle foot orthosis (a foot orthosis). A project of Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia, 2012.
26.
KuboKMiyoshiTTerashimaK. Influence of lift walker for human walk and suggestion of walker device with power assistance. In: IEEE international symposium on micro-nanomechatronics and human science, MHS, October2009, pp.525–528.
27.
SongCGKimSCNamKC. Optimum electrode configuration for detection of leg movement using bio-impedance. Physiol Meas2005; 26: S59–S68.
28.
RungeCFShupertCLHorakFB. Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. Gait Posture1999; 10: 161–170.
29.
KwakkelSP. Foot and ankle kinematics during gait using foot mounted inertial sensors. A thesis of specialization of BMES, University of Calgary, Canada, 2007.
30.
BlayaJAHerrH. Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2004; 12(1): 24–31.
31.
SubramanyaKKumarAKanakabettuM. Functional electrical stimulation for neurorehabilitation. A new design program. Nitte Univ J Health Sci2012; 2(3): 14–15.
32.
GrahamJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neurological and musculoskeletal conditions. In Touch2010; Autumn(132): 1–8.
33.
WeberDJSteinRBChanKM. Functional electrical stimulation using microstimulators to correct foot drop: a case study. Can J Physiol Pharmacol2004; 82: 784–792.
34.
KimSParkS. Leg stiffness increases with speed to modulate gait frequency and propulsion energy. J Biomech2011; 44: 1253–1258.
35.
FabiánRJVerlindenO. Review of control algorithms for robotic ankle systems in lower-limb orthoses, prostheses, and exoskeletons. Med Eng Phys2012; 34: 397–408.
36.
AkdogEAdliMA. The design and control of a therapeutic exercise robot for lower limb rehabilitation: physiotherabot. Mechatronics2011; 21: 509–522.
37.
KrishnanVLatashMLAruinAS. Early and late components of feed-forward postural adjustments to predictable perturbations. J Clin Neurophysiol2012; 123: 1016–1026.
38.
HelleraBWClarkebAJGoodcTR. Automated setup of functional electrical stimulation for drop foot using a novel 64 channel prototype stimulator and electrode array: results from a gait-lab based study. Med Eng Phys, in press.
39.
VodovnikLDimitrijevicMRPrevecT. Electronic walking aids for patients with peroneal palsy. In: Proceedings of European symposium medical electronics, 1965, pp.58–61.
40.
MunroCAHerringtonLComfortP. Comparison of landing knee valgus angle between female basketball and football athletes: possible implications for anterior cruciate ligament and patellofemoral joint injury rates. Phys Ther Sport2012; 2: 1–6.
41.
FuWLiuYZhangS. Effects of local elastic compression on muscle strength, electromyographic, and mechanomyographic responses in the lower extremity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2012; 22: 44–50.
42.
CortesNMorrisonS. Landing technique affects knee loading and position during athletic tasks. J Sci Med Sport2012; 15: 175–181.
43.
FutamiKSKawanishiTSugiyamaT. Application of local EMG-driven FES to incompletely paralyzed lower extremities. In: 10th annual conference of international FES society, 2005.
44.
ScholesCJDonaldMDParkerAW. Single-subject analysis reveals variation in knee mechanics during step landing. J Biomech2012; 45: 2074–2078.
45.
BreenPPCorleyGJ. A programmable and portable NMES device for drop foot correction and blood flow assist applications. Med Eng Phys2009; 31: 400–408.
46.
KotiadisDHermensHJVeltinkPH. Inertial gait phase detection for control of a drop foot stimulator inertial sensing for gait phase detection. Med Eng Phys2010; 32: 287–297.
47.
ByrneCAKeeffeDTDonnellyAE. Effect of walking speed changes on tibialis anterior EMG during healthy gait for FES envelope design in drop foot correction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2007; 17: 605–616.
48.
Al-MashhadanyYI. Measurement of human leg joint angle through motion based on electromyography (EMG) signal. Int J Comput Commun Eng2011; 11(2): 46–57.
49.
ChenaMWuaBLouaX. A self-adaptive foot-drop corrector using functional electrical stimulation (FES) modulated by tibialis anterior electromyography (EMG) dataset. Med Eng Phys, in press.
50.
DelisALAzevedoJLRochaF. Development of a myoelectric controller based on knee angle estimation. In: BIODEVICES—international conference on biomedical electronics and devices, 2009.
51.
MachadoMFloresPClaroJC. Development of a planar multibody model of the human knee joint. Nonlinear Dynam2010; 60: 459–478.
52.
GeyerHHerrH. A muscle-reflex model that encodes principles of legged mechanics produces human walking dynamics and muscle activities. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2010; 1–10.
