Focusing on the application of stealth aircraft maneuvering tactics, this study investigates the influence of maneuvering flight on electromagnetic scattering characteristics. A motion trajectory scattering (MTS) calculation method based on flight dynamics principles (FDP) and dynamic characteristic calculation (DCC) is proposed. The maneuvering trajectory model is developed using a 6-DOF model, and the changes in radar line-of-sight angle and aircraft attitude angle during maneuvering flight are derived. The rotation matrix formulas of aileron, rudder and elevator are presented. Based on these rotation matrices, a hybrid grid matrix representing the deflection states of the aircraft’s various control surfaces is established. The calculation of the dynamic stealth characteristics of the aircraft is accomplished through the dynamic RCS simulation model. Several typical maneuvering actions are selected to validate the calculation method for maneuvering aircraft. The simulation results demonstrate that this method is applicable to dynamic RCS calculation of diverse flight trajectories. The deflection of the control surfaces has a significant impact on the dynamic RCS of the aircraft, and it is closely related to the flight attitude and the relative position of the radar. In the design and tactical application of aircraft stealth, these factors must be taken into account to reduce the risk of being detected.
SangJH. Low-observable technologies of aircraft. Aviation Industry Press, 2013, pp. 14–15.
3.
PerssonBBullP. Empirical study of flight-dynamic influences on radar cross-section models. J Aircraft2015; 53(2): 463–474. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c033566
4.
ZhuangYQZhangCXZhangXK. A novel simulation approach of aircraft dynamic RCS. Prog Electromagn Res M2014; 36: 8591. https://doi.org/10.2528/pierm14040311
5.
LiuJFangNWangBF, et al.A novel dynamic RCS simulation and analysis method considering attitude perturbation. J Electromagn Waves Appl2015; 29(14): 1841–1858. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205071.2015.1051189
6.
QiYTZhangXYLinG, et al.A simulation method of aircraft dynamic RCS. Chin J Radio Sci2019; 34(1): 97–103.
7.
WenBQWangTChengK, et al.Simulation study on dynamic RCS characteristics of typical aerial targets. J Projectil, Roc, Missil Guid2020; 40(2): 5–9.
8.
ZhangWYXuHJChen ZZH, et al.Research on detection probability of stealth aircraft based on dynamic RCS. Flight Dyn2020; 38(1): 61–65.
9.
ZhangZDLiXZhangJP, et al.Dynamic measurement method of target RCS based on attitude correction. Syst Eng Electron2019; 41(6): 1242–1248.
10.
De MaioAFarinaAFogliaG. Target fluctuation models and their application to radar performance prediction. IEE Proc - Radar, Sonar Navig2004; 151(5): 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-rsn:20040842
FordKLBennettJCHoltbyDG. Use of a plane-wave synthesis technique to obtain target RCS from near-field measurements, with selective feature extraction capability. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag2013; 61(4): 2051–2057. https://doi.org/10.1109/tap.2012.2232636
NothKLukeD. Modeling and simulation of ground based radar surveillance solutions for unmanned aircraft system sense and avoid. In: AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011, pp. 63–75.
15.
SchalkwykRFVSmitJC. Dynamic radar cross section measurements of a full-scale aircraft for RCS modelling validation. In: International conference on radar systems (radar 2017). IET, 2017, p. 892.
ZhangJFFengDJWangXS, et al.Simulation of dynamic RCS data of radar targets. J Syst Simul2005; 17(4): 834–837.
18.
WangMK, C, X, ZhangX, K, Zhang, Research on typical maneuvering target dynamic RCS characteristics, Bull Sci Technol2015; 31(7): 106–110.
19.
SuDLZengGQLiuY, et al.RCS study of moving radar targets. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut2006; 32(12): 1413–1417.
20.
ZhuangYQZhangCXZhangXK, et al.Statistical analysis and simulation of typical stealth aircraft dynamic RCS. J Microw2014; 30(5): 17–21.
21.
DaiCXuZHXiaoSP. Analysis for differences between dynamic and static RCS characteristics of radar target. J Signal Process2013; 29(9): 1256–1263.
22.
ZhangCXZhuangYQZhangXK, et al.A study modeling of moving target' s radar cross section. Modern radar2014; 16(12): 66–69.
23.
LiuWMTongCMWangT, et al.Analysis of an influence of aircraft movement feature on radar detection performance. J Air Force Engineer Univ2017; 21(1): 7–12.
24.
LiJLZengYHZhouB, et al.Gesture consistency of airplane target between static and dynamic measurement. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut2013; 29(9): 453–457.
25.
LiuJFangNXieYJ, et al.Dynamic target RCS characteristic analysis under the influence of attitude perturbation. Syst Eng Electron2015; 37(4): 775–781.
26.
KabambaPTMeerkovSMZeitzFH. Optimal path planning for unmanned combat aerial vehicles to defeat radar tracking. J Guid Control Dynam2006; 29(2): 279–288. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.14303
27.
ChenSFLiuHFChenJ, et al.Penetration trajectory planning based on radar tracking features for UAV. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol2013; 85(1): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/00022661311294067
28.
ZhouZYHuangJWuNN. Acoustic and radar integrated stealth design for ducted tail rotor based on comprehensive optimization method. Aero Sci Technol2019; 92: 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.06.003
29.
ZhouZYHuangJ. Joint improvements of radar/infrared stealth for exhaust system of unmanned aircraft based on sorting factor pareto solution. Sci Rep2021; 11(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87756-0
30.
ZhouZYHuangJYiMX. Comprehensive optimization of aerodynamic noise and radar stealth for helicopter rotor based on pareto solution. Aero Sci Technol2018; 82: 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.09.030
31.
XuQQGeJQYangT, et al.A trajectory design method for coupling aircraft radar cross-section characteristics. Aero Sci Technol2020; 98: 105653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105653
32.
BacciDVagiasI. A trade-off analysis between lateral/directional stability and radar cross section requirements of an air-to-air combat airframe. Aero Sci Technol2023; 138: 108361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108361
33.
DingWPXuJP. Evaluation of electromagnetic scattering by electrically large bodies with cracks and cavities on their surfaces. Acta Electron Sin2002; 30(6): 815–818.
34.
ZhouCZiHSunTP, et al.A local current based iterative physical optics method for computing the RCS of target above sea surface. Eng Anal Bound Elem2023; 146: 318–326.
35.
WangJBYeJYWuXL, et al.RCS statistical modeling of stealth targets based on fractional-order legendre polynomials. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst2023; 59(6): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2023.3309613
36.
WangDPZhangCXZhuangYQ. An analysis of the impact of movement feature on aircraft dynamic RCS statistical characteristics. J Air Force Engineer Univ2015; 16(4): 19–23.
