This study presents a homing guidance law based on a prescribed performance controller (PPC) to simultaneously satisfy impact-angle and impact-time constraints. The proposed approach leverages a range-parametrized prescribed performance function (PPF) designed to be continuous and smoothly differentiable to enforce the impact-angle constraint. For the impact-time constraint, a closed-form expression for the time-to-go is first derived by modeling the line-of-sight angle as a polynomial function of the range. The resulting time-to-go error dynamics are then enforced through the designed PPF, whose bounds dynamically contract with the remaining range to ensure error convergence to the prescribed terminal bounds. The field-of-view constraint is enforced through a smooth switching function in the integrated guidance law, ensuring that the look-angle remains within its prescribed limits. Extensive numerical simulations validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
RyooCKChoHTahkMJ. Optimal guidance laws with terminal impact angle constraint. J Guid Control Dynam2005; 28(4): 724–732. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.8392
2.
JeonISLeeJITahkMJ. Impact-time-control guidance law for anti-ship missiles. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2006; 14(2): 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2005.863655
ParkBGKimTHTahkMJ. Optimal impact angle control guidance law considering the seeker’s field-of-view limits. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2013; 227(8): 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410012452367
5.
ParkBGKimTHTahkMJ. Range-to-go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraint and seeker’s look angle limits. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst2016; 52(3): 1241–1256. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2016.150415
6.
WangPFanJChenS, et al.Optimal look-angle guidance with field-of-view and impact angle constraints for strapdown munition. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering2022; 2022(1): 6057998. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6057998
7.
ZhuYZhouCChenS, et al.A parameterized solution to optimal guidance law against stationary target with impact angle constraint. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst2024; 61: 3993–4003.
8.
YangZWangHLinD. Time-varying biased proportional guidance with seeker’s field-of-view limit. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering2016; 2016(1): 9272019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9272019
9.
KimTHParkBGTahkMJ. Bias-shaping method for biased proportional navigation with terminal-angle constraint. J Guid Control Dynam2013; 36(6): 1810–1816. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.59252
10.
HeSLinD. A robust impact angle constraint guidance law with seeker’s field-of-view limit. Trans Inst Meas Control2015; 37(3): 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331214538278
11.
WangXZhangYWuH. Sliding mode control based impact angle control guidance considering the seeker’s field-of-view constraint. ISA Trans2016; 61: 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.12.018
12.
ZhouSZhangSWangD. Impact angle control guidance law with seeker’s field-of-view constraint based on logarithm barrier lyapunov function. IEEE Access2020; 8: 68268–68279. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2986355
13.
TianJBaiXYangH, et al.Time-varying asymmetric barrier lyapunov function-based impact angle control guidance law with field-of-view constraint. IEEE Access2020; 8: 185346–185359. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3030158
14.
LeeSLeeYKimY, et al.Impact angle control guidance considering seeker’s field-of-view limit based on reinforcement learning. J Guid Control Dynam2023; 46(11): 2168–2182. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007715
15.
WangJTaoXDongW, et al.Three-dimensional predefined-time impact angle control guidance law with field-of-view limit. J Franklin Inst2023; 360(12): 7621–7644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2023.06.021
16.
LiuBHouMYuY, et al.Three-dimensional impact angle control guidance with field-of-view constraint. Aero Sci Technol2020; 105: 106014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106014
17.
LeeSKimY. Capturability of impact-angle control composite guidance law considering field-of-view limit. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst2019; 56(2): 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2019.2925485
18.
LiuBHouMFengD. Nonlinear mapping based impact angle control guidance with seeker’s field-of-view constraint. Aero Sci Technol2019; 86: 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.02.009
19.
ZhangYWangXWuH. Impact time control guidance with field-of-view constraint accounting for uncertain system lag. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2016; 230(3): 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015594401
20.
JeonISLeeJI. Impact-time-control guidance law with constraints on seeker look angle. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst2017; 53(5): 2621–2627. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2017.2698837
21.
KimHGKimHJ. Backstepping-based impact time control guidance law for missiles with reduced seeker field-of-view. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst2018; 55(1): 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2018.2848319
22.
AiXWangLYuJ, et al.Field-of-view constrained two-stage guidance law design for three-dimensional salvo attack of multiple missiles via an optimal control approach. Aero Sci Technol2019; 85: 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.052
23.
LiuSYanBZhangT, et al.Guidance law with desired impact time and fov constrained for antiship missiles based on equivalent sliding mode control. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering2021; 2021(1): 9923332. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9923332
24.
LeeJYKimHGKimHJ. Adjustable impact-time-control guidance law against non-maneuvering target under limited field of view. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2022; 236(2): 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100211012996
25.
WangJDingXWangC, et al.Look angle tracking based three-dimensional impact time control guidance law with field-of-view constraint. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2023; 33(16): 9951–9968. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.6886
26.
ZhangLYiWGuanJ. Nonsingular sliding mode guidance law for impact time control with field-of-view constraint. IEEE Access2025; 13: 32004–32015.
27.
LiuZLeiGXianY, et al.Adaptive impact-time-control cooperative guidance law for uavs under time-varying velocity based on reinforcement learning. Drones2025; 9(4): 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040262
28.
LeeJYKimH. Impact time and angle control guidance with rendezvous concept. In: 2018 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, p. 1322.
29.
AritaSUenoS. Optimal feedback guidance for nonlinear missile model with impact time and angle constraints. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, p. 4785.
30.
HarlNBalakrishnanSN. Impact time and angle guidance with sliding mode control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2011; 20(6): 1436–1449. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2011.2169795
HuQHanTXinM. New impact time and angle guidance strategy via virtual target approach. J Guid Control Dynam2018; 41(8): 1755–1765. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003436
33.
ErerKSTekinR. Impact time and angle control based on constrained optimal solutions. J Guid Control Dynam2016; 39(10): 2448–2454. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g000414
34.
ShimSWHongSMMoonGH, et al.Impact angle and time control guidance under field-of-view constraints and maneuver limits. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2018; 19(1): 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0004-8
35.
KimHGLeeJYKimHJ, et al.Look-angle-shaping guidance law for impact angle and time control with field-of-view constraint. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst2019; 56(2): 1602–1612. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2019.2924175
36.
ChenYWuSWangX. Impact time and angle control optimal guidance with field-of-view constraint. J Guid Control Dynam2022; 45(12): 2369–2378. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007030
37.
BechlioulisCP. Adaptive control with guaranteed transient and steady state tracking error bounds for strict feedback systems. Automatica2007; 43(2): 31.
38.
ZhaoKSongYMaT, et al.Prescribed performance control of uncertain euler–lagrange systems subject to full-state constraints. IEEE Transact Neural Networks Learn Syst2017; 29(8): 3478–3489. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2727223
39.
LyuSZhuZHTangS, et al.Prescribed performance slide mode guidance law with terminal line-of-sight angle constraint against maneuvering targets. Nonlinear Dyn2017; 88(3): 2101–2110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3365-9
40.
HeSLeeCHShinHS, et al.Optimal guidance and its applications in missiles and UAVs. Springer, 2020.
41.
GopalanARatnooAGhoseD. Time-optimal guidance for lateral interception of moving targets. J Guid Control Dynam2016; 39(3): 510–525. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001527
