For the harshness of launch load, in-orbit disturbance and thermal load, vibration and shape control are crucial to the success of large deployable antennas. This article addresses the implementation of electromagnetic damping in vibration and shape control of a large deployable antenna. Mechanical-electromagnetic coupling of the damping is analyzed theoretically. Simulations of SDOF systems with the electromagnetic damping are conducted and control efficiencies of the damping for vibration isolation, vibration absorption and shape control are verified. Vibration isolation of the antenna under launch load, vibration absorption of the antenna under in-orbit disturbance and shape control of the antenna under thermal load are studied, and the control results show that the proposed electromagnetic damping provides a promising control method for vibration and shape control of large space structures.
MeguroAShintateKUsuiM, et al.In-orbit deployment characteristics of large deployable antenna reflector onboard engineering test satellite VIII. Acta Astronaut2009; 65: 1306–1316.
2.
PuigLBartonARandoN. A review on large deployable structures for astrophysics missions. Acta Astronaut2010; 67: 12–26.
3.
DatashviliLEndlerSWeiB, et al.Study of mechanical architectures of large deployable space antenna apertures: from design to tests. CEAS Space J2013; 5: 169–184.
4.
ScialinoLIhleAMigliorelliM, et al.Large deployable reflectors for telecom and Earth observation applications. CEAS Space J2013; 5: 125–146.
5.
LiTJGuoJCaoYY. Dynamic characteristics analysis of deployable space structures considering joint clearance. Acta Astronaut2011; 68: 974–983.
6.
Santiago-ProwaldJBaierH. Advances in deployable structures and surfaces for large apertures in space. CEAS Space J2013; 5: 89–115.
7.
WangZWLiTJYaoS. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of space cable net structures with one to one internal resonances. Nonlinear Dyn2014; 78: 1461–1475.
8.
MorterolleSMaurinBDubeJF, et al.Modal behavior of a new large reflector conceptual design. Aero Sci Technol2015; 42: 74–79.
9.
MiniFScialinoGLMilanoM, et al.European large deployable antenna (12 meter): development status and applications. In: IEEE aerospace conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 3–10 March 2007.
10.
YarzaACastroOSantiago-ProwaldJ, et al.Reflector vibroacoustic response to launch acoustic excitation. In: 4th European conference on antennas and propagation. Barcelona, Spain, 12–16 April 2010.
11.
MisawaMOgawaA. Analytical and experimental frequency verification of deployed satellite antennas. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Norfolk, VA, USA, 7–10 April 2003.
12.
FarmerJTWahlsDMWrightRL, et al.Thermal distortion analysis of an antenna-support truss in geosynchronous orbit. J Spacecraft Rockets1992; 29(3): 386–393.
13.
GotteroMSacchiEScialinoGL, et al.The large deployable antenna (LDA) a review of thermal aspects. In: 35th international conference on environmental systems. Rome, Italy, 11-14 July 2005.
14.
KawanoTIshimuraKMinesugiK, et al.A technique to evaluate on-orbit thermal deformation for large precise structures in ASTRO-H. In: 56th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Kissimmee, FL, USA, 5–9 January 2015.
15.
GuoWLiYHLiYZ, et al.Thermal-structural analysis of large deployable space antenna under extreme heat loads. J Therm Stress2016; 39(8): 887–905.
16.
NiuHPXieSLZhangXN. Hybrid vibration control of a circular cylindrical shell using electromagnetic constrained layer damping treatment. J Vib Control2009; 15(9): 1397–1422.
17.
KumarAPandaSKumarA, et al.Performance of a graphite wafer-reinforced viscoelastic composite layer for active-passive damping of plate vibration. Compos Struct2018; 186: 303–314.
18.
DongGXZhangYHLuoYJ, et al.Enhanced isolation performance of a high-static-low-dynamic stiffness isolator with geometric nonlinear damping. Nonlinear Dyn2018; 93: 2339–2356.
19.
RittwegerAAlbusJHornungE, et al.Passive damping devices for aerospace structures. Acta Astronaut2002; 50(10): 597–608.
20.
Moshrefi-TorbatiMKeaneAJElliottSJ, et al.Active vibration control (AVC) of a satellite boom structure using optimally positioned stacked piezoelectric actuators. J Sound Vib2006; 292: 203–220.
21.
XuRLiDXJiangJP, et al.Decentralized adaptive fuzzy vibration control of smart gossamer space structure. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2017; 28(12): 1670–1681.
22.
LuoYJZhangXZhangYH, et al.Active vibration control of a hoop truss structure with piezoelectric bending actuators based on a fuzzy logic algorithm. Smart Mater Struct2018; 27(8): 1–13.
23.
FangHFPattomMJWangKW, et al.Shape control of large membrane reflector with PVDF actuation. In: 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–26 April, 2007.
24.
ZhangYHNiuHPXieSL, et al.Numerical and experimental investigation of active vibration control in a cylindrical shell partially covered by a laminated PVDF actuator. Smart Mater Struct2008; 17: 1–12.
25.
ZhangYHZhangXNXieSL. Adaptive vibration control of a cylindrical shell with laminated PVDF actuator. Acta Mech2010; 210: 85–98.
26.
LuYFShaoQYangF, et al.Control of membrane structures with in-plane polyvinylidene fluoride actuators. Int J Struct Stabil Dynam2020; 20(08): 1–23.
27.
JhaAKInmanDJ. Sliding mode control of a gossamer structure using smart materials. J Vib Control2004; 10(8): 1199–1220.
28.
LeniowskaLMazanD. MFC sensors and actuators in active vibration control of the circular plate. Arch Acoust Q2015; 40(2): 257–265.
29.
MaGLXuMLAnZY, et al.Active vibration control of an axially moving cantilever structure using MFC. Int J Appl Electrom2016; 52(3): 967–974.
ParhiASinghBN. Nonlinear free vibration analysis of shape memory alloy embedded laminated composite shell panel. Mech Adv Mater Struct2017; 24(9): 713–724.
32.
PabloFPetitjeanB. Electrostrictive patches for active vibration control of thin plate host structures. In: Smart structures and materials 2000: smart structures and integrated systems, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 6–9 March 2000.
33.
PabloFOsmontDOhayonR. Modeling of plate structures equipped with current driven electrostrictive actuators for active vibration control. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2003; 14(3): 173–183.
34.
DengZXDapinoMJ. Review of magnetostrictive materials for structural vibration control. Smart Mater Struct2018; 27(11): 1–18.
35.
ChenQNataleDNeeseB, et al.Piezoelectric polymers actuators for precise shape control of large scale space antennas. In: Proceedings of electroactive polymer actuators and devices. San Diego, CA, USA, 19-22 March 2007.
36.
PengFJLiangXXHuYR, et al.Actuation precision control of SMA actuators used for shape control of inflatable SAR antenna. Acta Astronaut2008; 63(5-6): 578–585.
37.
WuKFangHFLanL, et al.Shape control of a CFRC reflector with PZT and MFC actuators. In: AIAA spacecraft structures conference, Kissimmee, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2018.
38.
SusheelCKKumarRChauhanVS, et al.Shape control of spacecraft antenna reflector using lead-free piezoelectric actuators. Eur J Comput Mech2014; 23(5-6): 199–216.
39.
KalraSBhattacharyaBMunjalBS. Design of shape memory alloy actuated intelligent parabolic antenna for space applications. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26(9): 1–14.
40.
DeSmidtHAWangKWFangHF. Optimized gore/seam cable-actuated shape control of gossamer membrane reflectors. J Spacecraft Rockets2007; 44(5): 1122–1130.
41.
BehrensSFlemingAJMoheimaniSOR. Electromagnetic shunt damping. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics. NSW, Australia, 20–24 July 2003.
42.
BehrensSFlemingAJMoheimaniSOR. Passive vibration control via electromagnetic shunt damping. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron2005; 10(1): 118–122.
43.
YanBZhangXNNiuHP. Design and test of a novel isolator with negative resistance electromagnetic shunt damping. Smart Mater Struct2012; 21(3): 1–9.
44.
YanBZhangXNLuoYJ, et al.Negative impedance shunted electromagnetic absorber for broadband absorbing: experimental investigation. Smart Mater Struct2014; 23(12): 1–12.
45.
YanBMaHYZhangL, et al.A bistable vibration isolator with nonlinear electromagnetic shunt damping. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 136: 1–19.
46.
StabileAAgliettiGSRichardsonG, et al.Design and verifition of a negative resistance electromagnetic shunt damper for spacecraft micro-vibration. J Sound Vib2017; 386: 38–49.
47.
StabileAAgliettiGSRichardsonG, et al.A 2-collinear-dof strut with embedded negative resistance electromagnetic shunt dampers for spacecraft micro-vibration. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26(4): 1–11.
WangPPZhangXN. Damper based on electromagnetic shunt damping method. Int J Appl Electrom2010; 33(3-4): 1425–1430.
50.
AuleleyMThomasOGiraud-AudineC, et al.Enhancement of a dynamic vibration absorber by means of an electromagnetic shunt. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2020; 32(3): 331–354.
51.
FlemingABehrensSMoheimaniSOR. Synthesis impedance for implementation of piezoelectric shunt damping circuit. Electron Lett2000; 36(18): 1525–1526.
52.
FlemingAMoheimaniSOR. Improved current and charge amplifier for driving piezoelectric loads, and issues in signal processing design for synthesis of shunt damping circuit. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2004; 15(2): 77–92.
