Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study presents a systematic parametric investigation aimed at optimizing the contraction design for a large low-speed wind tunnel. The numerical study is undertaken by relating the geometric and performance parameters of a contraction nozzle to satisfy a certain set of design criteria. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed in ANSYS Fluent by solving the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach coupled with the Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-ω turbulence model. Contraction design charts were developed for three different test section flow speeds (10 m/s, 25 m/s, and 75 m/s). The range of geometrical parameters explored includes contraction length (L/D) from 0.8 to 1.6, match point location (X) from 0.2 to 0.8, and polynomial power factors (n₁ and n₂) ranging from 3 to 9. An optimal combination of these parameters effectively prevents boundary layer flow separation around the entrance, while also minimizing boundary layer thickness and velocity field nonuniformity downstream of the exit. Notably, transitioning from a square-to-rectangular cross-section to an octagon-to-octagon cross-section significantly enhances the flow quality in the test section. The contraction with an octagonal cross-section, characterized by n₁ = 3, n₂ = 6, L/D = 1.02, and X = 0.575, meets all design criteria and is proposed as the optimal choice for a large low-speed wind tunnel with a contraction ratio (CR) of 9.

Keywords

Contraction design low speed wind tunnel aerodynamics RANS turbulence SST separation test section flow quality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barlow

Rae

Pope

. Low-speed wind tunnel testing. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.

Katz

Plotkin

. Low-speed aerodynamics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, Vol. 13.

Chmielewski

. Boundary-layer considerations in the design of aerodynamic contractions. J Aircraft 1974; 11(8): 435–438.

Johl

. The design and performance of a 1.9 m × 1.3 m indraft wind tunnel. Doctoral dissertation. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 2010.

Calautit

Chaudhry

Hughes

, et al. A validated design methodology for a closed-loop subsonic wind tunnel. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 2014; 125: 180–194.

Mehta

. Aspects of the design and performance of blower tunnel components. Doctoral dissertation. London: University of London, 1979.

Almeida

Miranda

Ferreira Neto

, et al. Low subsonic wind tunnel—design and construction. J Aero Technol Manag 2018; 10: e1018.

Quinn

Watts

Nagle

, et al. A new low-turbulence wind tunnel for animal and small vehicle flight experiments. R Soc Open Sci 2017; 4(3): 160960.

Pennycuick

Alerstam

Hedenström

. A new low-turbulence wind tunnel for bird flight experiments at Lund University, Sweden. J Exp Biol 1997; 200(10): 1441–1449.

10.

Barrett

. Design and performance of a new low turbulence wind tunnel at Bristol University. Aeronaut J 1984; 88(873): 86–90.

11.

Borger

. The optimization of wind tunnel contractions for the subsonic range (NASA Technical Report No. NASA TN D-8162). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1976.

12.

Batill

Hoffman

. Aerodynamic design of three-dimensional subsonic wind tunnel inlets. AIAA J 1986; 24(2): 268–269.

13.

Leifsson

Koziel

. Simulation-driven design of low-speed wind tunnel contraction. J Comput Sci 2015; 7: 1–12.

14.

Downie

Jordinson

Barnes

. On the design of three-dimensional wind tunnel contractions. Aeronaut J 1984; 88(877): 287–295.

15.

Morel

. Comprehensive design of axisymmetric wind tunnel contractions. J Fluids Eng 1975; 97(2): 225.

16.

Morel

. Design of two-dimensional wind tunnel contractions. ASME. J Fluids Eng 1977; 99(2): 371.

17.

Lindgren

Flow facility design and experimental studies of wall-bounded turbulent shear-flows. Doctoral dissertation. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Mechanics at the Royal Institute of Technology, 2002.

18.

Batill

Caylor

Hoffman

. An experimental and analytic study of the flow in subsonic wind tunnel inlets. US Gov Print Off 1983; 0173.

19.

Batill

Nelson

. Low speed, indraft wind tunnels. In: Glauser

M. S.

(eds) Frontiers in Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 1989, pp. 25–94.

20.

Bell

Mehta

. Boundary-layer predictions for small low-speed contractions. AIAA J 1989; 27(3): 372–374.

21.

Batchelor

Shaw

. A consideration of the design of wind tunnel contractions. Div Aeronaut CSIR, 1943.

22.

Mikhail

. Optimum design of wind tunnel contractions. AIAA J 1979; 17(5): 471.

23.

Brassard

Ferchichi

. Transformation of a polynomial for a contraction wall profile. J Fluid Eng 2005; 127(1): 183–185.

24.

Watmuff

. Wind tunnel contraction design. 9th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference. University of Auckland, 1987, pp. 472–475.

25.

Derbunovich

Zemskaia

Repik

, et al. The effect of contraction on the level of flow turbulence. Izv Mekh Zhidkosti Gaza Akad Nauk SSSR 1987; 23: 146–152.

26.

Kareem

Abbas

Khammas

. Aerodynamic study of low-speed wind tunnel contraction section: design and manufacturing. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2021; 1094(1): 012077.

27.

Vishwanathan

Szoke

Duetsch-Patel

, et al. Aerodynamic design and validation of a contraction profile for flow field improvement and uncertainty quantification in a subsonic wind tunnel. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 2020, p. 2211.

28.

Lakshman

Basak

. Analysis of transformed sixth-order polynomial for the contraction wall profile by using OpenFOAM. In: Singh

B. N.

Roy

Maiti

D. K.

(eds) Recent Advances in Theoretical, Applied, Computational and Experimental Mechanics: Proceedings of ICTACEM 2017. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 133–144.

29.

Hasselmann

aus der Wiesche

Kenig

. Optimization of piecewise conical nozzles: theory and application. J Fluid Eng 2019; 141(12): 121202.

30.

Leifsson

Koziel

. Surrogate-based shape optimization of low-speed wind tunnel contractions. 42nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 2012, p. 3344.

31.

Fang

. A design method for contractions with square end sections. ASME. J Fluids Eng 1997; 119(2): 454.

32.

Katz

Low-Speed Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

33.

. Flow analysis and design of three-dimensional wind tunnel contractions. AIAA J 1991; 29(11): 1912–1920.

34.

Bell

Mehta

. Contraction design for small low-speed wind tunnels (NASA-CR-177488). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1988.

35.

Fang

Chen

Hong

. Experimental and analytical evaluation of flow in a square-to-square wind tunnel contraction. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 2001; 89(3-4): 247–262.

36.

Menter

. Eddy viscosity transport equations and their relation to the k-ε model; 1997.

37.

Wilcox

. A half-century historical review of the k-omega model. 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 1991, p. 615.

38.

Zhang

Sun

van Zuijlen

, et al. Numerical simulation of transitional flow on a wind turbine airfoil with RANS-based transition model. J Turbul 2017; 18(9): 879–898.

39.

Menter

Lechner

Matyushenko

. Best practice: RANS turbulence modeling in Ansys CFD. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS Inc, 2021.

40.

ANSYS Inc . ANSYS fluent theory guide, release, 2021 R1; 2021.

41.

Reddy

Balaji

. Optimum micro-vortex generator design for planar symmetric diffuser under fully developed turbulent flow. Phys Fluids 2024; 36(12): 125160.

42.

Blazek

. Computational fluid dynamics: principles and applications. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015.

43.

White

. Fluid mechanics. New York, NY: Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 1979.

44.

Arslanian

Matin

. Undergraduate research on conceptual design of a wind tunnel for instructional purposes. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), 2012, pp. 25–1390.

45.

Stratford

. The prediction of separation of the turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 1959; 5(1): 1–16.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.02 MB

Aerodynamic design of three-dimensional contraction for low-speed wind tunnel

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material