A finite-time consensus protocol is presented in this paper for a network of connected heterogeneous agents with fixed and switching topology. In this study, two cases directed networks with fixed topology and directed networks with switching topology are examined. Convergence analysis for both the cases are presented. An independent tracking controller, which assures that an agent follows an ideal trajectory designed by sliding mode based consensus control, is devised. Agents stability are independent of the distributed consensus algorithm. Under the proposed control methodology, the measurement vectors of heterogeneous agents converge to the agreement value in a finite amount of time. The comparison results with the existing works show the proposed algorithm’s improved performance in terms of convergence time in presence of disturbances.
WangXWangG. Distributed finite time optimisation algorithm for second-order multi-agent systems subject to mismatched disturbances. IET Control Theory & Appl2020; 14(18): 2977–2988, DOI: 10.1049/cth2.v14.18.
2.
RenWCaoY. Distributed coordination of multi-agent networks: emergent problems, models, and issues. Incorporated: Springer Publishing Company, 2013.
3.
ZhaoJLiXYuX, et al.Finite-time cooperative control for bearing-defined leader-following formation of multiple double-integrators. IEEE Trans Cybern2022; 52(12): 13363–13372. DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3124827.
4.
ChenQJinYWangT, et al.UAV formation control under communication constraints based on distributed model predictive control. IEEE Access2022; 10: 126494–126507. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3225434.
5.
RezaeeHAbdollahiF. Resilient attitude alignment in multispacecraft systems. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst2019; 55(6): 3651–3657. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2019.2895586.
6.
WangJQiaoJWenG, et al.Rendezvous of heterogeneous multiagent systems with nonuniform time-varying information delays: an adaptive approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2021; 51(8): 4848–4857. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2945592.
7.
KloockMAlrifaeeB. Coordinated cooperative distributed decision-making using synchronization of local plans. IEEE Trans Intell Veh2023; 8(2): 1292–1306. DOI: 10.1109/TIV.2023.3234189.
8.
QueraltaJPTaipalmaaJCan PullinenB, et al.Collaborative multi-robot search and rescue: planning, coordination, perception, and active vision. IEEE Access2020; 8: 191617–191643. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030190.
9.
Olfati-SaberRFaxJAMurrayRM. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proc IEEE2007; 95: 215–233.
10.
RenWBeardRW. Distributed consensus in multi-vehicle cooperative control: theory and applications. In: Communications and control engineering. 1st ed.London: Springer, 2007.
11.
PalM. A sliding mode based finite-time consensus protocol for heterogeneous multi agent uas. In: 2022 IEEE international IOT, electronics and mechatronics conference (IEMTRONICS), Toronto, ON, 01–04 June 2022, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1109/IEMTRONICS55184.2022.9795821.
12.
BaiHWenJT. Cooperative load transport: a formation-control perspective. IEEE Trans Robot2010; 26(4): 742–750. DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2010.2052169.
13.
PalMDasSKumarR, et al.Terminal sliding mode control (tsmc) based cooperative load transportation using multiple drones. In: 2022 IEEE international IOT, electronics and mechatronics conference (IEMTRONICS), Toronto, ON, 01–04 June 2022, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1109/IEMTRONICS55184.2022.9795736.
14.
YangXJiaJZhangS, et al.Congestion control based on consensus in the wireless sensor network. Int J Distributed Sens Netw2013; 9(9): 632398. DOI: 10.1155/2013/632398.
15.
RenWBeardRAtkinsE. A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination. Proceedings of the 2005, American control conference, Portland, OR, 08–10 June 2005, Vol. 3: pp. 1859–1864.
16.
AbdoOErkinTÇelikH. Otonom Kol Uçuşu Için Kontrol Sistemi Tasarimi control system design for autonomous formation flight. In: 2021 29th signal processing and communications applications conference (SIU). Istanbul, Turkey, 09–11 June 2021, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/SIU53274.2021.9477915.
17.
ErkinTOmerASanliY, et al.Vision-based autonomous aerial refueling. In AIAA SCITECH 2022 forum. San Diego, CA & Virtual, 2022. DOI: 10.2514/6.2022-1384.
18.
Olfati-SaberRMurrayR. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Trans Automat Control2004; 49(9): 1520–1533.
19.
XiaoFWangL. State consensus for multi-agent systems with switching topologies and time-varying delays. Int J Control2006; 79: 1277–1284.
20.
RenWBeardRWAtkinsEM. Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control. IEEE Control Syst Mag2007; 27(2): 71–82. DOI: 10.1109/MCS.2007.338264.
21.
ValcherMEZorzanI. On the consensus of homogeneous multi-agent systems with arbitrarily switching topology. Automatica2017; 84: 79–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.07.011.
22.
NiWChengD. Leader-following consensus of multi-agent systems under fixed and switching topologies. Syst Control Lett2010; 59: 209–217.
23.
HongYGaoLChengD, et al.Lyapunov-based approach to multiagent systems with switching jointly connected interconnection. IEEE Transactions on2007; 52: 943–948.
24.
TianYPLiuCL. Consensus of multi-agent systems with diverse input and communication delays. IEEE Transactions on2008; 53(9): 2122–2128.
25.
YanJGXGuanXPLuoXY. Consensus pursuit of heterogeneous multi-agent systems under a directed acyclic graph. Chin Phys B2011; 20(4): 048901.
26.
DuHWenGWuD, et al.Distributed fixed-time consensus for nonlinear heterogeneous multi-agent systems. Automatica, 2020; 113: 108797.
27.
ZhouYYuXSunC, et al.Higher order finite time consensus protocol for heterogeneous multi-agent systems. Int J Control2015; 88(2): 285–294. DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2014.950047.
28.
ZhuYKGuanXPLuoXY. Finite-time consensus of heterogeneous multi-agent systems with linear and nonlinear dynamics. Acta Autom Sin2014; 40(11): 2618–2624. DOI: 10.1016/S1874-1029(14)60408-0.
29.
WielandPAllgowerF. An internal model principle for consensus in heterogeneous linear multi-agent systems. NECSYS’12. 2009; 42(20): 7–12. doi:10.3182/20090924-3-IT-4005.00002
30.
QuZChunyuJWangJ. Nonlinear cooperative control for consensus of nonlinear and heterogeneous systems. In 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, 12–14 December 2007, 2301–2308. DOI: 10.1109/CDC.2007.4434203.
31.
DanaeefardNMajdVJ. Consensus of heterogeneous multi-agent systems using output feedback. In AI robotics (IRANOPEN), Qazvin, Iran, 12 April 2015, 1–7. DOI: 10.1109/RIOS.2015.7270734.
KimHShimHSeoJH. Output consensus of heterogeneous uncertain linear multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Automat Control2011; 56(1): 200–206.
34.
GengHWuHMiaoJ, et al.Consensus of heterogeneous multi-agent systems under directed topology. IEEE Access2022; 10: 5936–5943. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142539.
35.
KhooSXieLManZ. Robust finite-time consensus tracking algorithm for multi-robot systems. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron2009; 14(2): 219–228.
36.
MasoodGSergeyGN. Finite-time coordination in multiagent systems using sliding mode control approach. Automatica2014; 50(4): 1209–12165.
37.
AlessandroPMauroFAlessandroP, et al.Recent advances in sliding-mode based consensus strategies. In 13th international workshop on variable structure systems (VSS). Nantes, France, 29 June–02 July 2014, pp. 1–6.
38.
DávilaJ. Distributed tracking of first order systems using second-order sliding modes. IFAC Proc Vol2014; 47(3): 1392–1397.
39.
LuXWangYYuX, et al.Finite-time control for robust tracking consensus in MASs with an uncertain leader. IEEE Trans Cybern2017; 47(5): 1210–1223. DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2541693.
40.
LiGWangXLiS. Finite-time output consensus of higher-order multiagent systems with mismatched disturbances and unknown state elements. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2019; 49(12): 2571–2581. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.6221021.
41.
LuoJLiuCLiuF. Distributed consensus analysis for a class of heterogeneous multi-agent systems composed of first-order and fourth-order integrators. In: 12th IEEE international conference on control & automation, (ICCA). Kathmandu, Nepal, 01–03 June 2016, pp. 565–570. DOI: 10.1109/ICCA.2016.7505337.
42.
SeoJHShimHBackJ. Consensus of high-order linear systems using dynamic output feedback compensator: low gain approach. Automatica2009; 45(11): 2659–2664.
UtkinVI. Sliding modes in control optimization. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
46.
RaoSGhoseD. Sliding mode control-based algorithms for consensus in connected swarms. Int J Control2011; 84(9): 1477–1490.
47.
EdwardsCSpurgeonSK. Sliding mode stabilization of uncertain systems using only output information. Int J Control1995; 62(5): 1129–1144.
48.
GabrielCLaraBAAlexandreS, et al.On the consensus of heterogeneous multi-agent systems: a decoupling approach. In: 3rd IFAC workshop on distributed estimation and control in networked systems, Santa Barbara, 2012, pp. 246–251.
