Regarding the regional area target collaborative tracking problem widely existing in intelligent scenarios, this paper built a distributed UAV swarm framework inspired by natural intelligence to heighten intricate missions’ efficiency. Also, a standoff collaboratively continuous tracking strategy was proposed based on a lateral guidance law with an improved Reference Point Guidance (RPG) and a longitudinal guidance law with an improved phase collaboration. Under an uncertain environment, this framework used an improved bat algorithm (IBA) to optimize the speed allocation of the UAV swarm’s online control strategy with information consensus estimation. Compared with a case without the designed transformation, statistically, the results demonstrate that the framework operates efficiently and robustly in phase error convergence, swarm flight distance, and fuel consumption, where a dynamic target exists.
CasanovasPde KokerLHashmiM. Law, socio-legal governance, the internet of things, and industry 4.0: a middle-out/inside-out approach. J Multidiscip Res2022; 5(1): 64–91. DOI: 10.3390/j5010005.
2.
ParkSKimY. A metaverse: taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE Access2022; 10: 4209–4251. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175.
3.
WeiPGuoKLiY, et al.Reinforcement learning-empowered mobile edge computing for 6G edge intelligence 2022. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–33. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11410.2201.11410
4.
RuCQiXGuanX. Distributed cooperative search control method of multiple UAVs for moving target. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng2015; 2015: 1–12. DOI: 10.1155/2015/317953.
ShiYMingZLiangH. Multi-disciplinary design optimization with variable complexity modeling for a stratosphere airship. CJA2019; 32(5): 1244–1255.
8.
LuoXLiSGuanX. Flocking algorithm with multi-target tracking for multi-agent systems. Pattern Recognit. Lett2010; 31(9): 800–805. DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.01.014.
9.
FrewEWLawrenceDAMorrisS. Coordinated standoff tracking of moving targets using Lyapunov guidance vector fields. J Guid Control Dyn2008; 31(2): 290–306. DOI: 10.2514/1.30507.
10.
ZhaoCZhuMLiangH, et al.The sustainable tracking strategy of moving target by UAV in an uncertain environment. In: 35th Chinese control conference (CCC). Chengdu, China: IEEE, 2016, pp. 5641–5647. DOI: 10.1109/ChiCC.2016.7554236.
11.
ZhaoCZhuMLiangH. The sustainable tracking strategy of moving target by multi-UAVs in an uncertain environment. In: IEEE international conference on aircraft utility systems (AUS). Beijing, China: IEEE, 2016, pp. 20–25. DOI: 10.1109/AUS.2016.7748014.
12.
WuHLiHXiaoR, et al.Modeling and simulation of dynamic ant colony’s labor division for task allocation of UAV swarm. Phys. A: Stat. Mech2018; 491: 127–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.094.
13.
SujitPGhoseD. Multiple UAV search using agent based negotiation scheme. In Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005. Portland, OR, USA: IEEE, 2005, vol. 5, pp. 2995–3000. DOI:10.1109/ACC.2005.1470430.
14.
LidowskiRLMullinsBEBaldwinRO. A novel communications protocol using geographic routing for swarming UAVs performing a Search Mission. In: IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications. Galveston, TX, USA: IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1109/PERCOM.2009.4912764.
15.
YuYWangHLiuS, et al.Distributed multi-agent target tracking: a nash-combined adaptive differential evolution method for UAV systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol2021; 70(8): 8122–8133. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2021.3091575.
16.
DoanVKLimMHOngYS, et al.Turning time estimation model for region coverage. In: 2010 international conference on computational problem-solving, ICCP 2010. Lijiang: IEEE, 2010, pp. 203–208.
17.
ZhaoYWangXWangC, et al.Systemic design of distributed multi-UAV cooperative decision-making for multi-target tracking. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst2019; 33(1–2): 132–158. DOI: 10.1007/s10458-019-09401-5.
18.
MaLHovakimyanN. Cooperative target tracking in balanced circular formation: multiple UAVs tracking a ground vehicle. In: 2013 American control conference. Washington, DC: IEEE, 2013, pp. 5386–5391. DOI: 10.1109/ACC.2013.6580679.
19.
ShinDSongYOhJ, et al.Nonlinear disturbance observer-based standoff target tracking for small fixed-wing UAVs. IJASS2021; 22(1): 108–119. DOI: 10.1007/s42405-020-00275-6.
20.
KokolakisNMTKoussoulasNT. Robust standoff target tracking with finite-time phase separation under unknown wind. J Guid Control Dyn2021; 44(6): 1183–1198. DOI: 10.2514/1.G005517.
21.
OhHKimSShinH-S, et al.Coordinated standoff tracking of moving target groups using multiple UAVs. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2015; 51(2): 1501–1514. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2015.140044.
22.
RagiSChongEKP. Decentralized control of unmanned aerial vehicles for multitarget tracking. In: International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS). Atlanta, GA, USA: IEEE, 2013, pp. 260–268. DOI: 10.1109/ICUAS.2013.6564698.
23.
IskandaraniMHafezATGivigiSN, et al.Using multiple quadrotor aircraft and linear model predictive control for the encirclement of a target. In: 2013 IEEE international systems conference (SysCon). c. Orlando, FL: IEEE, 2013, pp. 620–627. DOI: 10.1109/SysCon.2013.6549947.
24.
ParkS. Performance and Lyapunov stability of a nonlinear path-following guidance. Method2007; 30(6): 1718–1728. DOI: 10.2514/1.28957.
25.
ParkSDeystJHowJ. A new nonlinear guidance logic for trajectory tracking. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-4900.
26.
LiXRJilkovVP. Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part I: dynamic models. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems2003; 39(4): 1333–1364. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2003.1261132.
27.
JacquesDPachterMWagnerG, et al. An analytical study of drag reduction in tight formation flight. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. 2001. DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-4075.
28.
WeimerskirchHMartinJClerquinY, et al.Energy saving in flight formation. Nature2001; 413(6857): 697–698. DOI: 10.1038/35099670.
YinS. Sensitivity analysis based on variance decomposition for factors in bat algorithm. Engineering Computations2019; 35(5): 1608–1625.
31.
SunTXinM. Multiple UAV target tracking using consensus-based distributed high degree cubature information filter. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-0347.
32.
Olfati-SaberRFaxJAMurrayRM. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proceedings of the IEEE2007; 95: 215–233. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2006.887293.
