In this study, a new ridge surface is proposed and its impact on the aerodynamic efficiency of a generic top-mounted submerged inlet is investigated at Mach 0.3 to 0.5. The concept is developed to investigate the possibility of vortex breakdown manipulation by the ridge surface to control the chaotic flow pattern after the breakdown, measuring the overall drag increment and total pressure recovery due to the ridge integration. For this purpose, a conceptual submerged inlet is designed with a semi-elliptic entrance for integration with a generic fuselage and ridge surfaces; then different study cases are modeled based on this configuration for numerical simulations by Ansys Fluent. Key factors such as the quality of the captured streamtube, vortex patterns on the fuselage, induced lift, and vortex breakdown patterns are investigated and compared by second order accuracy. Results indicate that the modified ridge surface improves the overall efficiency of the fuselage-inlet configuration both in the terms of lift over drag and pressure recovery.
FrickCWDavisWFRandallLM, et al.“An experimental investigation of NACA submerged-duct entrances.”NACA Technical Report No. ACR-5I20, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1945.
2.
HolzhauserCA.“An experimental investigation at large scale of an NACA submerged intake and deflector installation on the rearward portion of a fuselage.”NACA Technical Note No. RM-A50F13, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951
3.
SacksAHSpreiterJR“Theoretical investigation of submerged inlets at low speeds.”NACA Technical Note No. TN-2323, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1951.
4.
HallCFBarclayFD“An experimental investigation of NACA submerged inlets at high subsonic speeds 1: inlets forward of the wing leading edge.”NACA Technical Note No. AM-A8B16, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1948.
TaskinogluESKnightDD. Multi-objective shape optimization study for a subsonic submerged inlet. J Propul Power2004; 20(4): 620–633. DOI: 10.2514/1.5809.
7.
JovanovicVJTaskinogluESKnightDD, et al.Experimental investigation of a submerged subsonic inlet. J Propul Power2006; 22(1): 214–217. DOI: 10.2514/1.15765.
8.
PérezCCFerreiraSBda SilvaLFF, et al.Computational study of submerged air inlet performance improvement using vortex generators. J Aircraft2007; 44(5): 1574–1587. DOI: 10.2514/1.25036.
9.
ChengD-STanH-JSunS, et al.Computational study of a high-performance submerged inlet with bleeding vortex. J Aircraft2012; 49(3): 852–860. DOI: 10.2514/1.C031483.
10.
SunSGuoR-WWuY-Z. Characterization and performance enhancement of submerged inlet with flush-mounted planar side entrance. J Propul Power2007; 23(5): 987–995. DOI: 10.2514/1.26432.
11.
SunSTanH-JWangC-X. Submerged inlet performance enhancement using a unique bump-shaped vortex generator. J Propul Power2016; 32(5): 1275–1280, DOI: 10.2514/1.B36085.
12.
WangYWangCXiaoY, et al.Construction methodology for lip surface of a submerged inlet. Aero Sci Technol2016; 54: 340–352. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.04.029.
13.
KucukUC “Application of response surface methodology to optimize aerodynamic performance of NACA inlet.” In: 53rd AIAA/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference. Atlanta, GA: AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum Home, 2017.
14.
PeiHCuiYKongB, et al.Structural parameters optimization of submerged inlet using least squares support vector machines and improved genetic algorithm-particle swarm optimization approach. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics2021; 15(1): 503–511. DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2021.1893226.
15.
MacManusDGChiereghinNPrietoDG, et al.Complex aeroengine intake ducts and dynamic distortion. AIAA J2017; 55(7): 2395–2409, DOI: 10.2514/1.J054905.
16.
PaulARRanjanPPatelVK, et al.Comparative studies on flow control in rectangular S-duct diffuser using submerged-vortex generators. Aero Sci Technol2013; 28(1): 332–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2012.11.014.
HuangGSahebyEBHaysA. “Propulsive efficiency of ridgeridge/inlet configuration.” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering2018; 2018: 1–17. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7462024
19.
SahebyEBShenXHuangG, et al.Flow structure of the ridge integrated submerged inlet. Aero Sci Technol2021; 119: 107136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107136.
MenterFR. “Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective.” Int J Comput Fluid Dynam2009; 23.4: 305–316. DOI: 10.1080/10618560902773387.
23.
WeissJMaruszewskiJSmithW, et al.Implicit solution of the Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured meshes. In: 13th computational fluid dynamics conference. Snowmass Village, CO, USA: Fluid Dynamics and Co-located Conferences Home, 1997. DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-2103.
24.
FiolaCAgarwalRK. “Simulation of secondary and separated flow in diffusing S ducts.” J Propul Power2015; 31.1: 180–191. DOI: 10.2514/1.B35275.
25.
SunSTanH. Flow characteristics of an ultracompact serpentine inlet with an internal bump. J Aerosp Eng. 2018; 31(2). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000801.
26.
DelotA-LScharnhorstR. “Computational and experimental results for flows in a diffusing S-duct without and with flow control devices.” In: 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference. Orlando, FL, USA: AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum Home, 2015. DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-3964
27.
NarayanGJohnB. Effect of winglets induced tip vortex structure on the performance of subsonic wings. Aero Sci Technol2016; 58: 328–340, DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.031.
28.
YiYHuTLiuP, et al.Dynamic lift characteristics of nonslender delta wing in large-amplitude-pitching. Aero Sci Technol2020; 105: 105937. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.105937.
29.
BarthTJespersenD. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes. In: 27th Aerospace sciences meeting. Reno, NV, USA: Aerospace Sciences Meetings Home, 1989, DOI: 10.2514/6.1989-366.
NovakFTurgutS. “Turbulent vortex breakdown at high Reynolds numbers.” AIAA J2000; 38.5: 825–834. DOI: 10.2514/2.1036
34.
ShenLWenC. “Oscillations of leading-edge vortex breakdown locations over a delta wing.” AIAA J2018; 56.6: 2113–2118. DOI: 10.2514/1.J056565
35.
GursulIWangZ. “Flow control of tip/edge vortices.” AIAA J2018; 56.5: 1731–1749. DOI: 10.2514/1.J056586
36.
WibowoSBBasukiBSutrisnoRohmatTA, et al.Vortex dynamics study and flow visualization on aircraft model with different canard configurations. Fluids2021; 6(4): 144. DOI: 10.3390/fluids6040144.
37.
SeddonELGoldsmithJ. “Intake aerodynamics”. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 1999, p. 271. Ch. 11.
