This work proposes a saturation control scheme for underactuated spacecraft formation reconfiguration in elliptic orbits without radial or along-track thrust. Firstly, the rank criterion method is applied to analyze the controllability and feasibility of formation reconfiguration by linearizing the linear time-varying dynamics to linear time-invariant ones. Based on the inherent coupling of the linear time-varying system, the underactuated error dynamics are presented for either underactuated case. Subsequently, the developed underactuated saturation controller can ensure that the time-varying system trajectory asymptotically converges to the specified configuration. The Lyapunov-based analysis presents the constraint conditions of controller parameters and the stable reconfiguration accuracy of the system states. Finally, numerical simulations for both underactuated scenarios are performed in the environment with J2 perturbation to verify the validity of the proposed underactuated control scheme.
YeDZouASunZ. Predefined-time predefined-bounded attitude tracking control for rigid spacecraft. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2022; 58: 464–472. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3103258.
2.
XiaoYde RuiterAYeD, et al.Adaptive fault-tolerant attitude tracking control for flexible spacecraft with guaranteed performance bounds. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2021; 58: 1922–1940. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3123295.
3.
HomayounzadeM. Adaptive robust nonlinear control of spacecraft formation flying: a novel disturbance observer-based control approach. Int J Dyn Control2022; 10: 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s40435-021-00898-x.
4.
WeiCWuXXiaoB, et al.Adaptive leader-following performance guaranteed formation control for multiple spacecraft with collision avoidance and connectivity assurance. Aerosp Sci Technol2022; 120: 107266. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107266.
5.
XiaoYde RuiterAYeD, et al.Attitude tracking control for rigid-flexible coupled spacecraft with guaranteed performance bounds. J Guid Control Dyn2020; 43: 327–337. DOI: 10.2514/1.G004535.
6.
WeiCXiongYChenQ, et al.On adaptive attitude tracking control of spacecraft: a reinforcement learning based gain tuning way with guaranteed performance. Adv Space Res2023; 71: 4534–4548. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2023.01.025.
7.
WuXLuoSYangS, et al.Adaptive appointed-time formation tracking control for multiple spacecraft with collision avoidance under a dynamic event-triggered mechanism. Adv Space Res2023; 70: 3552–3567. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.08.045.
8.
BuinhasLFörstnerR. Formation reconfiguration optimization for the IRASSI space interferometer. Adv Space Res2021; 67: 3819–3839. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.08.019.
9.
SheYLiSWangZ. Constructing a large antenna reflector via spacecraft formation flying and reconfiguration control. J Guid Control Dyn2019; 42: 1372–1382. DOI: 10.2514/1.G004116.
10.
Di MauroGSpillerDRafano CarnàSF, et al.Minimum-fuel control strategy for spacecraft formation reconfiguration via finite-time maneuvers. J Guid Control Dyn2019; 42: 752–768. DOI: 10.2514/1.G003822.
11.
JiaQGuiYWuY, et al.Disturbance observer-based performance guaranteed fault-tolerant control for multi-spacecraft formation reconfiguration with collision avoidance. Aerosp Sci Technol2023; 133: 108099. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.108099.
12.
ZhuangMTanLLiK, et al.Fixed-time position coordinated tracking control for spacecraft formation flying with collision avoidance. Chinese J Aeronaut2021; 34: 182–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.12.024.
13.
RouzegarHKhosraviASarhadiP. Spacecraft formation flying control under orbital perturbations by state-dependent Riccati equation method in the presence of on-off actuators. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2019; 233: 2853–2867. DOI: 10.1016/10.1177/0954410018787417.
14.
GodardKKDZouA. Robust stationkeeping and reconfiguration of underactuated spacecraft formations. Acta Astronaut2014; 105: 495–510. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.10.008.
OlivaresAStaffettiE. Hybrid switched time-optimal control of underactuated spacecraft. Acta Astronaut2018; 145: 456–470. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.01.051.
17.
ZinjanabiAMPishkenariHNSalariehH, et al.Attitude control of an underactuated satellite in presence of disturbance torque with optimal motion planning. Aerosp Sci Technol2022; 121: 107326. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107326.
18.
TianHLiAWangY, et al.Underactuated attitude tracking control of tethered spacecraft for deployment and spin-up. Adv Space Res2023; 71: 4829–4842. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2023.01.052.
19.
ClohessyWHWiltshireRS. Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. J Aerosp Sci1960; 9: 653–674. DOI: 10.2514/2.4875.
20.
HuangXYanYZhouY. Nonlinear control of underactuated spacecraft hovering. J Guid Control Dyn2016; 39: 685–694. DOI: 10.2514/1.G001306.
21.
HuangXYanY. Saturated backstepping control of underactuated spacecraft hovering for formation flights. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2017; 53: 1988–2000. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2017.2679838.
22.
ShaoJZhouQYeD, et al.Finite-time synchronization control scheme for underactuated satellite formation reconfiguration. Adv Space Res2023; 72: 1010–1026. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.011.
23.
ShaoJZhouQYeD, et al.Feasibility analysis and synchronous control for underactuated spacecraft formation hovering. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2023: 1–9. early access. DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2023.3293989.
24.
TschaunerJHempelP. Rendezvous with a target in an elliptical orbit. Astronaut Acta1965; 11: 104–109.
25.
ChenQMengYLiaoY, et al.Intersatellite distance-keeping control based on relative motion geometry. J Guid Control Dyn2023; 46: 177–185. DOI: 10.2514/1.G006765.
26.
ZhengD. Linear system theory. 2rd ed.Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2002.
27.
HuangXYanYZhouY. Dynamics and control of underactuated spacecraft formation reconfiguration in elliptic orbits. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2018; 232: 2214–2230. DOI: 10.1177/0954410017711722.
28.
HuangXChenL. Indirect optimization of underactuated spacecraft formation reconfiguration in elliptic orbits. J Aerosp Eng2021; 34: 04020086. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001209.
29.
GongKLiaoYMeiY. Extended state observer-based output feedback control for spacecraft pose tracking with control input saturation. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2022; 236: 645–660. DOI: 10.1177/09544100211017751.
30.
MeiYGongKLiaoY. A 6-DOF extended state observer-based adaptive generalized super twisting algorithm of fault-tolerant control for coupled spacecraft with actuator saturation. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2023; 237: 1239–1254. DOI: 10.1177/09544100221119862.
31.
NadafiRKabganianM. Robust backstepping attitude tracking control of an underactuated spacecraft with saturation and time-variant perturbations. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2022; 236: 502–516. DOI: 10.1177/09544100211015938.
32.
YeDZhangJSunZ. Extended state observer-based finite-time controller design for coupled spacecraft formation with actuator saturation. Adv Mech Eng2017; 9: 1687814017696413. DOI: 10.1177/1687814017696413.
33.
WeiCLiYYinZ, et al.On finite-time anti-saturated proximity control with a tumbling non-cooperative space target. Space Sci Technol2023; 3: 1–14. DOI: 10.34133/space.0045.
34.
WuXLuoSWeiC, et al.Observer-based fault-tolerant attitude tracking control for rigid spacecraft with actuator saturation and faults. Acta Astronaut2021; 178: 824–834. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.10.017.
35.
LiuBGuoYLiA, et al.Distributed Nussbaum-based finite-time containment control for multi-UAVs with actuator saturation and Faults. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2022; 59: 3505–3520. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3226676.
36.
ZhangHYeDXiaoY, et al.Adaptive control on SE(3) for spacecraft pose tracking with harmonic disturbance and input saturation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2022; 58: 4578–4594. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3165524.
37.
MishneD. Formation control of satellites subject to drag variations and J2 perturbations. J Guid Control Dyn2004; 27: 685–692. DOI: 10.2514/1.11156.
38.
InalhanGTillersonMHowJP. Relative dynamics and control of spacecraft formations in eccentric orbits. J Guid Control Dyn2002; 25: 48–59. DOI: 10.2514/2.4874.
39.
YamanakaKAnkersenF. New state transition matrix for relative motion on an arbitrary elliptical orbit. J Guid Control Dyn2002; 25: 60–66. DOI: 10.2514/2.4875.
