Variable flow ducted rockets are excellent candidates for propulsion systems in hypersonic vehicles. However, the anti-regulation characteristics of the gas flow not only decrease the stability of ducted rockets but also create difficulties in the control system design. In this study, a model predictive control (MPC)–based compound control algorithm that suppresses the anti-regulation is proposed. First, a mathematical model involving a gas flow regulation system was developed to describe and analyse the anti-regulation. Next, a fused feedback variable that included both the gas flow and the gas generator pressure signal was constructed. An MPC control system with the fused feedback variable was also designed. Then, to accurately predict the gas flow and the anti-regulation, a nonlinear disturbance observer was constructed. To evaluate the performance of the controller, two scenarios that were regulated by a tracking differentiator proportional–integral–derivative controller and a model reference adaptive control controller were constructed and compared. The theoretical results demonstrate that the proposed method exhibited a superior performance compared to previous methods by overcoming the supposed trade-off between the response rate and the anti-regulation of gas flow systems.
WaltrupPWhiteMZarlingoF, et al.History of US Navy ramjet, scramjet, and mixed-cycle propulsion development. J Propuls Power2002; 18: 14–27.
2.
HewittP. Status of ramjet programs in the United States. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit 2008, Hartford, CT, 21–23 July 2008, p. 5265.
3.
DavenasA. History of the development of solid rocket propellant in France. J Propuls Power1995; 11: 285–291.
4.
WilsonRLimageCHewittP. The evolution of ramjet missile propulsion in the US and where we are headed. In: 32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. July 1996, Lake Buena Vista, FL, 01–03 July 1996, p. 3148.
5.
FryRS. A century of ramjet propulsion technology evolution. J Propuls Power2004; 20: 27–58.
6.
BauerCDavenneFHopfeN, et al.Modelling of a throttleable ducted rocket propulsion system. In: 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit, San Diego, CA, 31 July–03 August 2011. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
7.
PintoPKurthG. Robust propulsion control in all flight stages of a throtteable ducted rocket. In: 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. San Diego, CA, August 2011, p. 5611.
8.
MaL-KXiaZ-XHuJ-X, et al.Investigation on the anti-regulation characteristic of variable flow ducted rocket. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2013; 227: 1488–1497.
9.
AlanAYildizYPoyrazU. Adaptive pressure control experiment: controller design and implementation. In: IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications, Bridgetown, Barbados, 16–18 August 2017. New York: IEEE, 2017.
10.
AlanAYildizYPoyrazU. High-performance adaptive pressure control in the presence of time delays pressure control for use in variable-thrust rocket development. IEEE Contr Syst Mag2018; 38: 26–52.
11.
NiuW-YBaoWChangJ-T, et al.Control system design and experiment of needle-type gas regulating system for ducted rocket. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2010; 224: 563–573.
12.
WangAZengQ-HMaL-K, et al.Virtual free-volume revised method and adaptive control for solid ducted rockets. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2021; 34: 04021053.
13.
ZhouJZhouC-SChenX. GA-BP neural network control for ducted rocket gas regulating system. Comp Simul2015; 032: 56–59.
14.
WilkersonFLucasJ. Variable flow solid propellant gas generator for missile control systems. In: 17th Joint Propulsion Conference 1981, Colorado Springs, Colorado, July, 1981, p. 1464.
15.
LauKMiddletonRHBraslavskyJH. Undershoot and settling time tradeoffs for nonminimum phase systems. IEEE Trans Auto Control2003; 48: 1389–1393.
16.
ZhouJZhangYZhengY, et al.Synergetic governing controller design for the hydraulic turbine governing system with complex conduit system. J Franklin Inst2018; 355(10): 4131–4146.
17.
QiY-WBaoWZhaoJ, et al.Coordinated control for regulation/protection mode-switching of ducted rockets. Acta Astronautica2014; 98: 138–146.
18.
ShiXChangJ-TBaoW, et al.Supersonic inlet buzz margin control of ducted rockets. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2010; 224: 1131–1139.
19.
ChangJ-TLiBBaoW, et al.Thrust control system design of ducted rockets. Acta Astronautica2011; 69: 86–95.
20.
ChaiJ-BChenXHeK, et al.Research on tracking differentiator for variable flow gas generator. J Propuls Tech2019; 40(5): 1153–1161.
21.
ZhaoZ-MChenXZhouC-S, et al.Research on optimum feedforward control of gas flow regulation of solid rocket ramjet. J Project Rockets Missil Guid2014; 34(3): 109–112.
22.
ErenUPrachAKocerBB, et al.Model predictive control in aerospace systems: current state and opportunities. J Guid Control Dyn2017; 40: 1541–1566.
23.
MorariMLeeJH. Model predictive control: past, present and future. Comp Chem Eng1999; 23: 667–682.
24.
de AlmeidaFA. Constrained dynamic compensation with model predictive control for tracking. Aerosp Sci Tech2019; 93: 105340.
25.
NiuW-YBaoWCuiTet al. Dynamic modeling and model reduction order of controllable flow solid ducted rockets. J Solid Rocket Tech2008; 31(4): 325–330.
26.
ChenB-BXiaZ-XHuangL-Y, et al.Characteristics of the combustion chamber of a boron-based solid propellant ducted rocket with a chin-type inlet. Aerosp Sci Tech2018; 82–83: 210–219.
27.
ChangJ-TLiNXuK-J, et al.Recent research progress on unstart mechanism, detection and control of hypersonic inlet. Prog Aerosp Sci2017; 89: 1–22.
28.
KomadaSMachiiNHoriT. Control of redundant manipulators considering order of disturbance observer. IEEE Trans Indus Elect2000; 47: 413–420.
29.
BaoWQiY-WChangJ-T. Multi-objective regulating and protecting control for ducted rocket using a bumpless transfer scheme. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2013; 227: 311–325.
30.
ZhengQXuZZhangH, et al.A turboshaft engine NMPC scheme for helicopter autorotation recovery maneuver. Aerosp Sci Tech2018; 76: 421–432.
31.
Montazeri-GhMRastiAJafariA, et al.Design and implementation of MPC for turbofan engine control system. Aerosp Sci Tech2019; 92: 99–113.
32.
CamachoEFAlbaCB. Model predictive control. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media, 2013.
33.
LiQYuanJZhangB, et al.Model predictive control for autonomous rendezvous and docking with a tumbling target. Aerosp Sci Tech2017; 69: 700–711.
34.
ChenW-H. Disturbance observer based control for nonlinear systems. IEEE-Asme Trans Mech2004; 9: 706–710.
35.
ManzoorTSunZXiaY, et al.MPC based compound flight control strategy for a ducted fan aircraft. Aerosp Sci Tech2020; 107: 106264.
36.
ChenW-HBallanceDJGawthropPJ, et al.A nonlinear disturbance observer for robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Indus Electr2000; 47: 932–938.
