An early estimation of the ship–helicopter dynamic interface flow environment is one of the most challenging and precarious tasks in any naval organization across the globe. The First-Of-Class Flying Trials (FOCFT) is one of the most common methods to evaluate the complexities associated with the ship–helicopter dynamic interface. These trials are very expensive and highly demanding, with added limitation that these can be conducted only after post-construction of the ship and restricting the scope of any further design modifications. This study presents an investigation to gain understanding of the aerodynamic impact of helicopter on shipboard flight deck flow physics under a ship–helicopter dynamic interface flow environment. The prime goal of this work is to investigate the influence of helicopter downwash aerodynamics over the ship flight deck using the simplified dynamic interface (SDI) model. A parametric analysis has been conducted for three identified rotor configurations at different crossflow conditions. The paper reports the influence of rotor ground effect over the flight deck region in terms of the downwash airflow characteristics, variation of rotor plane velocity gradients and the airwake existing over the flight deck region. Finally, an attempt has been made to grade the effect of ground on a ship–helicopter dynamic interface for safeguarding the helicopter operations.
ValHJ. The prospects for simulating the helicopter/ship interface. Naval Eng J1987; 99(2): 45–63.
3.
ZanSJ. On aerodynamic modelling and simulation of the dynamic interface. Proceeding Inst Mech Eng G - J Aerospace Eng2005; 219: 393–410.
4.
WilkinsonC>ZanSJGilbertN, et al.Modelling and simulation of ship air wakes for helicopter operations: a collaborative venture. In: RTO AVT symposium, 1998, pp. 8–18–11.
5.
CheneyBZanSJ. CFD code validation data and flow topology for TTCP-2 simple frigate shape. Rotorcraft technologies and operations, TR-LTR-A-035, NRC-CNRC. Toronto, Canada: National Research Council Canada (NRC), 1999.
6.
LeeR. SFS2 code validation data update. TTCP AER TP-2 dynamic interface workshop. Toronto, Canada: National Research Council Canada (NRC), 2003.
7.
ReddyKRToffolettoRJonesKRW. Numerical simulation of ship airwake. Comput Fluids2001; 29(4): 451–465.
8.
SymsG. Simulation of simplified-frigate airwakes using a lattice-boltzmann method. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynamics2008; 96(7): 1197–1206.
9.
RoperDM>OwenLPadfieldGD, et al.Integrating CFD and piloted simulation to quantify ship-helicopter operating limits. Aeronaut J2006; 3051: 419–428.
10.
ForrestJS and OwenI. An investigation of ship airwakes using detached-eddy simulation. Comput Fluids2010; 39(4): 656–673.
11.
WakefieldNHNewmanSJ and WilsonP. Helicopter flight around a ship’s superstructure. Proc Inst Mech Eng G: J Aerospace Eng2002; 216(1): 13–28.
12.
ZanSJ. Experimental determination of rotor thrust in a ship airwake. J Am Helicopter Soc2002; 47(2): 100–108.
13.
LeeRGZanSJ. Unsteady aerodynamic loading on a helicopter fuselage in a ship airwake. J Am Helicopter Soc2004; 49(2): 149–159.
14.
LeeRGZanSJ. Wind tunnel testing of a helicopter fuselage and rotor in a ship airwake. J Am Helicopter Soc2005; 50(4): 326–337.
15.
NacakliY. Analysis of helicopter downwash/frigate airwake interaction using statistically designed experiment. PhD Thesis. Norfolk: Old Dominion University, 2010.
16.
WangYCurranJOwenI, et al.AirDyn: an instrumented model-scale helicopter for measuring unsteady aerodynamic loading in airwakes. Meas Sci Techn2011; 22: 045901.
17.
KääriäCHWangYPadfieldGD, et al.Aerodynamic loading characteristics of a model-scale helicopter in a ship’s airwake. J Aircraft2012; 49(5): 1271–1278.
18.
WangYWhiteMBarakosGN, et al.Simulation of a light aircraft encountering a helicopter wake. J Aircraft2015; 52(2): 510–523.
19.
CrozonCSteijlRBarakosGN, et al.Coupled flight dynamics and CFD-demonstration for helicopters in shipborne environment. Aeronaut J2018; 122: 42–82.
20.
Makkar ISVijayakumarRSinghSN, et al.Study of dynamic flow effects due to ship air wake and rotor downwash interaction on warship helo-decks. In: Proceeding of advanced technologies in naval design. UK: Construction, & Operation, 2016.
21.
ShuklaSSinghSNSrinivasanB. RANS study of flow characteristics over flight deck of simplified frigate ship. In: 67th APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meet, San Francisco, USA, 2014.
22.
ShuklaSSinghSNSrinivasanB. A computational study of modified TTCP/SFS ship airwakes. In: Royal Institution of Naval Architects - International Conference on Ship and Offshore Technology, ICSOT India. Coastal and Inland Shipping2015; 1–9.
23.
ShuklaSSinghSNSinhaSS, et al.Aerodynamic assessment of cross-wind airwake characteristics at ship flight deck: a simplified approach. In: 72th APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meet, USA, 2019.
24.
AliAShuklaSSinghSN. Computational investigation of blade sailing phenomenon by fluid structure interaction approach. In: Proceedings of 2nd International ISHMT-ASTFE Heat and Mass Transfer Conference (IHMTC),2017: 1033–1040. DOI: 10.1615/IHMTC-2017.1440.
25.
ShuklaSSinghSNSinhaSS, et al.An investigation of ship airwakes by scale adaptive simulation. Int J Mar Navigation Saf Sea Transportation2020; 14(2): 471–476. DOI: 10.12716/1001.14.02.27.
26.
VigneshK>NasiruddinSShuklaS, et al.Pressure and velocity measurements of flow past a proposed generic aircraft carrier (GAC) geometry. J Eng Maritime Environ2021; 236(2): 326–345. DOI: 10.1177/14750902211048958.
27.
ShuklaSSinhaSSSarohaS, et al.Experimental and computational investigation of airwake aerodynamics of the generic aircraft carrier with ski-jump. J Ocean Eng2022; 249. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110902.
28.
FreemanCEMineckRE. Fuselage pressure measurements of a helicopter wind-tunnel model with A 3.15 diameter single rotor. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 1979.
29.
TanabeYSaitoSOoyamaN, et al.Study of a downwash caused by a hovering rotor in ground effect. Liverpool, UK, Sept: 34th European Rotorcraft Forum, 2008, pp. 16–18.
30.
TanabeYSaitoSOoyamaN, et al.Investigation of the downwash induced by rotary wings in ground effect. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2009; 10: 20–29.
31.
IboshiNUsudaHItogaN. Ground effect of a hovering rotor over confined area 45th aircraft symposium. Japan: Kitakyushu, 2007.
32.
O’BryanT. An Investigation of the effect of downwash from a VTOL aircraft and a helicopter in the ground environment, NASA TN D-977. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 1961.
33.
RamasamyMPotsdamMYamauchiGK. Measurements to understand the flow mechanisms contributing to tandem-rotor outwash. Virginia Beach, USA: AHS 71st Annual Forum, 2015.
34.
Tanner PEOvermeyerADJenkinsLN, et al.Experimental investigation of rotorcraft outwash in ground effect. VA, USA: AHS 71st Annual Forum, 2015.
35.
PullaDP. A study of helicopter aerodynamics in ground effect. PhD Thesis. ISBN 9780542778988. The Ohio State University, Publication Number: AAI3226340, 2006.
36.
SharmaAPadtheAFriedmannPP, et al.Helicopter shipboard landing simulation including wind, deck motion and dynamic ground effect. J Aircraft2021; 58: 3.
37.
ShuklaSSinghSNSinhaSS, et al.A conceptual method to assess ship-helicopter dynamic interface. IMechE, J Aerospace Eng2019; 234(5): 1092–1116.
38.
ShuklaSSinghSNSinhaS, et al.Comparative assessment of URANS, SAS and DES turbulence modelling in the predictions of massively separated ship airwake characteristics. J Ocean Eng2021; 229. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108954.
39.
ShuklaS. Study of the ship airwake and helicopter downwash characteristics for safe helo operations. PhD Thesis. Delhi, India: Indian Institute of Technology, 2020.
40.
PopeSB. Turbulent flows. 1st revise. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
CAA paper 2004/02, flight deck design considerations - environmental effects. UK: Safety Regulation Group Civil Aviation Authority, ISBN 0860399591, 2004.
43.
CAA paper 2004/03, helicopterturbulence criteria for operations to offshore platforms. UK: Safety Regulation Group, Civil Aviation Authority, ISBN 0860399621, 2004.
44.
CAA paper 2008/02, offshore flight deck environmental research. UK: Safety Regulation Group, Civil Aviation Authority, ISBN 9780117924390, 2009.
CAP 437. Offshore helicopter landing areas - guidance on standards. 6th EditionAugust 2010. UK: Safety Regulation Group, Civil Aviation Authority, ISBN 9780117924390.
47.
DynasciencesCorporation.Trecom technical report, downwash impingement design criteria for VTOL aircraft. Fort Washington, Pennsylvania: U. S. Army Transportation Research Command, A, 44-177-AMC-65(T), 1964.
48.
SilvaDFCPagotPSaiz JabardoPJ, et al.CFD simulation and wind tunnel investigation of a FPSO offshore flight deck turbulent flow In: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering. China, 2010.
49.
CurtisSunHCMJr.PutmanWFHankerEJ. Rotor aerodynamics in ground effect at low advance ratios. J Am Helicopter Soc1984; 29(1): 48–55.
50.
OrucIHornJFPolskyS, et al.Coupled flight dynamics and CFD simulations of the helicopter/ship dynamic interface. US: 71st American Helicopter Society Forum, 2015.
