Numerical investigation of bending–torsion coupling effect on aeroacoustic noise of a flexible unmanned aerial vehicle propeller

Abstract

The recent explosion in interest into the use of UAVs for a wide range of commercial applications has also raised awareness of the issue of noise coming from UAVs. This paper introduces a method for predicting the aeroacoustic noise of a flexible UAV propeller while considering bending–torsion coupling. Numerical simulations of a flexible UAV propeller are conducted under hovering conditions to investigate the coupling effect on noise prediction using a fluid–structure interaction and acoustic model based on Formulation 1A of Farassat. The bending–torsion coupling leads to additional bending-induced torsional deformation along with considerable increases in noise and the overall sound pressure level. The results indicate that the noise evaluated without the coupling was underestimated compared to that evaluated with the coupling. Finally, the bending–torsion coupling is shown to be essential for precisely predicting the noise of a rotating flexible UAV propeller to respond to strengthening noise regulations.

Keywords

Flexible unmanned aerial vehicle propeller bending–torsion coupling aeroacoustic noise Farassat’s Formulation 1A fluid–structure interaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Christian

Cabell

. Initial investigation into the psychoacoustic properties of small unmanned aerial system noise. In: 23rd AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Hampton, VA, USA, 2017, p. 4051.

Torija

Chaitanya

. Psychoacoustic analysis of contra-rotating propeller noise for unmanned aerial vehicles. The J Acoust Soc America 2021; 149(2): 835–846.

Commission Delegated Regulation (Eu) . on unmanned aircraft systems and on third-country operators of unmanned aircraft systems, 2019/945 of 12 March 2019.

Sinibaldi

Marino

. Experimental analysis on the noise of propellers for small UAV. Appl Acoust 2013; 74(1): 79–88.

Tinney

Sirohi

. Multirotor drone noise at static thrust. AIAA J 2018; 56(7): 2816–2826.

Nardari

Casalino

Polidoro

, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of flow confinement effects on UAV rotor noise. In: 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 20–23 May 2019, p. 2497.

Lee

. Rotor interactional effects on aerodynamic and noise characteristics of a small multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle. Phys Fluids 2020; 32(4): 047107.

Hodges

Dowell

. Nonlinear equations of motion for the elastic bending and torsion of twisted nonuniform rotor blades. NASA TN D-7818, 1974.

Hong

Chopra

. Aeroelastic stability analysis of a composite rotor blade. J Am Helicopter Soc 1985; 30(2): 57–67.

10.

Castillo Pardo

Goulos

Pachidis

. Modelling and analysis of coupled flap-lag-torsion vibration characteristics helicopter rotor blades. Proc Inst Mech Eng G: J Aerospace Eng 2017; 231(10): 1804–1823.

11.

Sina

Ashrafi

Haddadpour

, et al. Flexural–torsional vibrations of rotating tapered thin-walled composite beams. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerospace Eng 2011; 225(4): 387–402.

12.

Menter

. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994; 32(8): 1598–1605.

13.

Shakya

Sunny

Maiti

. A parametric study of flutter behavior of a composite wind turbine blade with bending-torsion coupling. Compos Structures 2019; 207: 764–775.

14.

Lighthill

. On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A. Math Phys Sci 1952; 211(1107): 564–587.

15.

Williams

Hawkings

. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A, Math Phys Sci 1969; 264: 321–342.

16.

Farassat

. Derivation of formulations 1 and 1A of Farassat, 2007. NASA/TM-2007-214853.

17.

Meng

. Aero-elastic stability analysis for large-scale wind turbines. Ph.D Thesis. Delft: Dissertation, TUDelft, 2011.