This article describes three-dimensional sliding mode guidance laws with prescribed performance. The proposed guidance laws can ensure that the line of sight (LOS) angle converges according to the prescribed performance, and the convergence rate, the steady-state error and the maximum overshoot can be preset in advance. By combining the LOS tracking error with the performance constraint function, a new error variable function is designed, and then the prescribed performance control problem is transformed into that of the boundedness of the error variable function. The key concept in this approach is to design a new sliding mode surface to ensure that the error variable function is bounded, so as to ensure that the system state converges according to the prescribed performance. Additionally, this article discusses the problem whereby the upper bound of the aggregate uncertainty, including the target information, is unavailable. An adaptive guidance law is presented for this scenario. Finally, simulations comparisons are conducted with other forms of guidance laws. Simulation results show that the guidance laws proposed in this article achieve effective performance.
KimBSLeeJGHahHS. Biased PNG law for impact with angular constraint. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst1998; 34: 277–288.
4.
HuGGuoJZhouJ. Integrated guidance and control of interceptors with impact angle constraint against a high-speed maneuvering target. Proc Imeche, G: J Aerospace Eng2019; 233(14): 5192–5204.
5.
RaoSGhoseD. Terminal impact angle constrained guidance laws using variable structure systems theory. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technology2013; 21(6): 2350–2359.
ChunwangJGuofengZRuiL, et al.Impact-angle-constrained reentry guidance law guaranteeing convergence before attainment of desired line-of-sight range. Proc Imeche, Part G: J Aerospace Eng2018; 233(8): 2783–2791.
8.
SeoMGLeeCHTahkMJ. New design methodology for impact angle control guidance for various missile and target motions. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technology2018; 26(6): 2190–2197.
9.
BalhanceNWeissMShimaT. Cooperative guidance law for intrasalvo tracking. J Guid Control Dyn2017; 40(6):1441–1456.
10.
ShafermanVShimaT. Cooperative optimal guidance laws for imposing a relative intercept angle. J Guid Control Dyn2015; 38(8):1395–1408.
11.
ShafermanVShimaT. Cooperative optimal guidance laws for imposing a relative intercept angle. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 13–16 August, 2012.
12.
LiuYFQiNMShanJJ. Cooperative interception with double-line-of-sight-measuring. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Boston, MA. 19–22 August, 2013.
13.
FonodRShimaT. Estimation enhancement by cooperatively imposing relative intercept angles. J Guid Control Dyn2017; 40(7):1711–1725.
14.
IlchmannARyanEPSangwinCJ. Tracking with prescribed transient behaviour. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations2002; 7: 471–493.
15.
IlchmannARyanEP. High-gain control without identification: a survey. GAMM-Mitteilungen2008; 31(1): 115–125.
16.
HopfeNIlchmannARyanEP. Funnel control with saturation: nonlinear SISO systems. IEEE Trans Automatic Control2010; 55(9): 2177–2182.
17.
IlchmannARyanEP. Performance funnels and tracking control. Int J Control2009; 82(10): 1828–1840.
18.
IlchmannALogemannHRyanEP. Tracking with prescribed transient performance for hysteretic systems. Soc Ind Appl Mathematics2010; 48(7): 4731–4752.
19.
IlchmannARyanEPTrennS. Tracking control: Performance funnels and prescribed transient behaviour. Syst Control Lett2005; 54(7): 655–670.
20.
HacklMCHopfeNIlchmannA, et al.Funnel control for systems with relative degree two. SIAM J Control Optimization2010; 51(2): 965–995.
21.
ReisTBergerT. Funnel control via funnel pre-compensator for minimum phase systems with relative degree two. IEEE Trans Automatic Control2018; 63(7): 2264–2271.
22.
IlchmannATrennS. Input constrained funnel control with applications to chemical reactor models. Syst Control Lett2004; 53(5): 361–375.
23.
IlchmannAHansDIS. PI-funnel control for two mass systems. IEEE Trans Automatic Control2009; 54(4): 918–923.
24.
BechlioulisCPRovithakisGA. Robust adaptive control of feedback linearizable MIMO nonlinear systems with prescribed performance, IEEE Trans Automatic Control2008; 53(9): 2090–2099.
25.
BechlioulisCPRovithakisGA. Adaptive control with guaranteed transient and steady state tracking error bounds for strict feedback systems, Automatica2009; 45(2): 532–538.
26.
BechlioulisCPRovithakisGA. Prescribed performance adaptive control for Multi-Input Multi-Output affine in the control nonlinear systems, IEEE Trans Automatic Control2010; 55(5): 1220–1226.
27.
BechlioulisCPRovithakisGA. Reinforcing robustness of adaptive dynamic surface control, Int J Adaptive Control Signal Process2013; 27(4): 323–339.
28.
ZhangCMaGFSunYC, et al.Simple model-free attitude control design for flexible spacecraft with prescribed performance. Proc Imeche, Part G: J Aerospace Eng2019; 233(8): 2760–2771.
29.
XiongSWangWSongS, et al.Extended state observer based impact angle constrained guidance law for maneuvering target interception. Proc Inst Mech Eng G: J Aerospace Eng2015; 229(14): 2589–2607.
30.
WangWXiongSLiuX, et al.Adaptive nonsingular terminal sliding mode guidance law against maneuvering targets with impact angle constraint. G: J Aerospace Eng2015; 229(5): 867–890.
31.
SongSHHaIJ. A Lyapunov-like approach to performance analysis of 3-dimensional pure PNG laws, IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst1994; 30(1): 238–248.
32.
YuSYuXShirinzadehB, et al.Continuous finite-time control for robotic manipulators with terminal sliding mode, Automatica2005; 44(11): 1957–1964.
33.
ZhuZXiaYFuM. Attitude stabilization of rigid spacecraft with finite-time convergence, Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2011; 21(6): 686–702.
34.
GuoYHuangBWangS, et al.Adaptive finite-time control for attitude tracking of spacecraft under input saturation. J Aerospace Eng2018; 31(2): 04017086.
35.
FischerNDaniASharmaN, et al.Saturated control of an uncertain nonlinear system with input delay, Automatica, 2013; 49(6): 1741–1747.
36.
ShinHSLiKBTsourdosA. A new three-dimensional sliding mode guidance law variation with finite time convergence, IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst2017; 53(5): 2221–2232.
37.
SiYSongS. Three-dimensional adaptive finite-time guidance law for intercepting maneuvering targets, Chin J Aeronautics2017; 30(6): 1985–2003.
