The work deals with indirect optimization of minimum-time and minimum-fuel interplanetary trajectories when gridded ion thruster models are considered. Using an accurate model of solar electric propulsion is beneficial in preliminary mission design, and allows including operational constraints. The maximum thrust and the specific impulse are expressed as a function of thruster input power, which is achieved by means of point-fitting lines that match the performance capabilities of the thrusters. Minimum-time and minimum-fuel problems are formulated to be solved by indirect optimization. In order to increase the accuracy and robustness of the shooting procedure, analytic Jacobians are derived, and a hybrid switching detection technique is used to improve the integration accuracy for minimum-fuel problems. Two examples of Earth-to-Mars transfer and Near-Earth rendezvous mission using the realistic NASA’s Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) are given to substantiate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.
PolkJKakudaRAndersonJ, et al.In-flight performance of the NSTAR ion propulsion system on the deep space one mission. IEEE Aerospace Conf Proc2000; 4: 123–148.
2.
DankanichJ. Low-thrust mission design and application. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Nashville, TN, 25–28 July 2010, 2010, pp. 6857.
3.
NishiyamaKHosodaSUenoK, et al.Development and testing of the Hayabusa2 ion engine system. Trans Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci Aerospace Tech Jpn2016; 14(30): 131–140.
4.
ChestaEEstublierDFallisB, et al.Flexible variable-specific-impulse electric propulsion systems for planetary missions. Acta Astronautica2006; 59(8–11): 931–945.
5.
Chang-DiazFSquireJBengtsonRet al.The physics and engineering of the vasimr engine. In. 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Huntsville, Alabama, 17–19 July 2000, 2000. pp. 3756.
6.
MitrofanovaOGnizdorRYMurashkoV, et al.New generation of spt-100. In. International Electric Propulsion Conference, Alexandria,VA, 30 September–02 October 1985, 2011, pp. 1–7.
7.
BrophyJEttersMGatesJet al.Development and testing of the dawn ion propulsion system. In 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Sacramento, CA, 09–12 July 2006, 2006, pp. 4319.
8.
ShastryRHermanDSoulasG, et al.NASA’s evolutionary xenon thruster (next) long-duration test as of 736 kg of propellant throughput. In. 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Atlanta,GA, 30 July–01 August 2012, 2012, pp. 4023.
9.
TurnerMJ. Rocket and Spacecraft Propulsion: Principles, Practice and New Developments. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
10.
WilliamsSNCoverstone-CarrollV. Mars missions using solar electric propulsion. J Spacecr Rocket2000; 37(1): 71–77.
11.
SaripalliPCardiffEEnglanderJ. Next performance curve analysis and validation. 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, July 25‐27, 2016. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 2016, pp. 1–1.
12.
OhDY. Evaluation of solar electric propulsion technologies for discovery-class missions. J Spacecr Rocket2007; 44(2): 399–411.
13.
YangG. Direct optimization of low-thrust many-revolution earth-orbit transfers. Chinese J Aerona2009; 22(4): 426–433.
14.
GuoTJiangFLiJ. Homotopic approach and pseudospectral method applied jointly to low thrust trajectory optimization. Acta Astronautica2012; 71: 38–50.
15.
YangHBaiXBaoyinH. Rapid generation of time-optimal trajectories for asteroid landing via convex optimization. JGCD2017; 40(3): 628–641.
16.
ZengXLiuX. Searching for time optimal periodic orbits near irregularly shaped asteroids by using an indirect method. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2017; 53(3): 1221–1229.
17.
LiHChenSIzzoD, et al.Deep networks as approximators of optimal low-thrust and multi-impulse cost in multitarget missions. Acta Astronautica2020; 166: 469–481.
18.
OhDBensonSWitzbergerK, et al.Deep space mission applications for next: NASA’s evolutionary xenon thruster. In. 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 11–14 July 2004, 2004, pp. 3806.
19.
McConaghyTTDebbanTJPetropoulosAE, et al.Design and optimization of low-thrust trajectories with gravity assists. J Spacecr Rocket2003; 40(3): 380–387.
20.
VavrinaMHowellK. Global low-thrust trajectory optimization through hybridization of a genetic algorithm and a direct method. In AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, 18–21 August 2008, 2008, pp. 6614.
21.
KowalkowskiTDBaileyZJLockREet al.Robotic mars exploration trajectories using hall thrusters. In. 24th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, San Diego CA, 4–7 August 2014, 2014, pp. 1.
22.
ChaiRSavvarisATsourdosA, et al.Improved gradient-based algorithm for solving aeroassisted vehicle trajectory optimization problems. JGCD2017; 40(8): 2093–2101.
23.
ChaiRSavvarisATsourdosA, et al.Trajectory optimization of space maneuver vehicle using a hybrid optimal control solver. IEEE Trans Cybernetics2017; 49(2): 467–480.
24.
OzakiNCampagnolaSFunaseR. Tube stochastic optimal control for nonlinear constrained trajectory optimization problems. JGCD2020; 43(4): 645–655.
25.
ChaiRSavvarisATsourdosA, et al.Stochastic spacecraft trajectory optimization with the consideration of chance constraints. IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech2019; 28(4): 1550–1559.
26.
EnglanderJConwayBWilliamsT. Automated interplanetary trajectory planning. In. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Minneapolis, MI, 13–16 August 2012, 2012, pp. 4517.
27.
RussellRP. Primer vector theory applied to global low-thrust trade studies. JGCD2007; 30(2): 460–472.
28.
BertrandREpenoyR. New smoothing techniques for solving bang–bang optimal control problems—numerical results and statistical interpretation. Optimal Control Appl Methods2002; 23(4): 171–197.
29.
JiangFBaoyinHLiJ. Practical techniques for low-thrust trajectory optimization with homotopic approach. JGCD2012; 35(1): 245–258.
30.
ZhangCTopputoFBernelli-ZazzeraF, et al.Low-thrust minimum-fuel optimization in the circular restricted three-body problem. JGCD2015; 38(8): 1501–1510.
31.
ChiZLiHJiangF, et al.Power-limited low-thrust trajectory optimization with operation point detection. Astrophysics Space Sci2018; 363(6): 122.
32.
QuartaAAMengaliG. Minimum-time space missions with solar electric propulsion. Aerospace Sci Tech2011; 15(5): 381–392.
33.
EnglanderJAConwayBA. Automated solution of the low-thrust interplanetary trajectory problem. JGCD2016; 40: 15–27.
ChiZYangHChenS, et al.Homotopy method for optimization of variable-specific-impulse low-thrust trajectories. Astrophysics Space Sci2017; 362(11): 216.
36.
SongYGongS. Solar sail trajectory optimization of multi-asteroid rendezvous mission. Acta Astronautica2019; 157: 111–122.
37.
CarusoAQuartaAAMengaliG. Comparison between direct and indirect approach to solar sail circle-to-circle orbit raising optimization. Astrodynamics2019; 3(3): 273–284.
38.
TopputoFCeccheriniS. A catalogue of parametric time-optimal transfers for all-electric GEO satellites. In: GFasanoJ DPintér (eds) Modeling and Optimization in Space Engineering. Oxfordshire, England: Springer, 2019, pp. 459–478.
39.
GonzaloJLTopputoFArmellinR, et al.Indirect optimization of end-of-life disposal for galileo constellation using low thrust propulsion. In. 26th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics 2017, Matsuyama, Japan, 3-9 June 2017, 2017, pp. 3–9.
40.
TaheriEAtkinsEMKolmanovskyI. Performance comparison of smoothing functions for indirect optimization of minimum-fuel low-thrust trajectories. In. Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Charlotte, NC, January 31–February 4 2021, 2018, pp. 0214.
