Adaptive model predictive control of a six-rotor electric vertical take-off and landing urban air mobility aircraft subject to motor failure during hovering
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2022
Adaptive model predictive control of a six-rotor electric vertical take-off and landing urban air mobility aircraft subject to motor failure during hovering
In this article, motor failure control of a six-rotor electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) urban air mobility aircraft is investigated using adaptive model predictive control (MPC) based on the linear parameter-varying (LPV) model developed using the nonlinear rigid-body aircraft model. For capturing the aircraft dynamics under motor failure conditions, a family of linearized models are obtained by trimming the nonlinear aircraft model at multiple equilibrium conditions and the LPV model is obtained by linking the linear models using the failed rotor speed, where the system transition from healthy to failure is modeled by a scheduling parameter calculated based on failed rotor speed caused by available motor peak power after failure. The proposed adaptive MPC is developed to optimize the system output performance, including the rigid-body aircraft velocity and altitude, by using quadratic programming optimization with reference compensation subject to a set of time-varying constraints representing the current available propeller acceleration calculated based on the motor power. Simulation study is conducted based on the developed LPV control design and original nonlinear rigid-body model, and the simulation results demonstrate that the designed adaptive MPC controller is able to recover and maintain the aircraft at desired stable condition after motor failure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BinderRGarrowLGermanB, et al. “If you fly it, will commuters come? Predicting demand for evtol urban air trips.” In: AIAA conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 25–29 June 2018, pp. 1–41.
2.
DorringtonGE. “Performance of electric vertical take-off and landing (EVTOL) hovering craft,” In: AIAC18: 18th Australian international aerospace congress HUMS-11th defence science and technology (DST) international conference on health and usage monitoring (HUMS 2019): ISSFD-27th international symposium on space flight dynamics (ISSFD), engineers Australia, Melbourne, Australia, 1 January 2019. Royal Aeronautical Society, 2019, p. 84.
3.
KleinbekmanICMiticiMAWeiP, “eVTOL arrival sequencing and scheduling for on-demand urban air mobility.” In: 2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th digital avionics systems conference (DASC), London, UK, 23–27 September 2018. IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–7.
4.
GermanBDaskilewiczMHamiltonTK, et al.“Cargo delivery in by passenger eVTOL aircraft: a case study in the San Francisco Bay Area,” In: 2018 AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Kissimmee, FL, 8–12 January 2018, p. 2006.
5.
PradeepPWeiP. “Heuristic approach for arrival sequencing and scheduling for eVTOL aircraft in on-demand urban air mobility,” In: 2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th digital avionics systems conference (DASC), London, UK, 23–27 September 2018. IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–7.
6.
SkuherskyM, “A first-principle power and energy model for eVTOL vehicles.”PhD thesis, Melbourne, FL: FloridaInstitute of Technology, 2019.
7.
PradeepPWeiP. “Energy efficient arrival with RTA constraint for urban eVTOL operations.” 2018 AIAA Aerosp Sci Meet. 2018; 16: 2008.
8.
DaskilewiczMGermanBWarrenM, et al. “Progress in vertiport placement and estimating aircraft range requirements for eVTOL daily commuting.” In: 2018 aviation technology, integration, and operations conference, Atlanta, GA, 25–29 June 2018, p. 2884.
9.
PayuhavorakulchaiP. “Cost analysis of EVTOL configuration design for air ambulance in Japan.” Tokyo, Japan: Keio University, 2019.
10.
VeghJMBoteroEClarkeM, et al. “Current capabilities and challenges of NDARC and SUAVE for eVTOL aircraft design and analysis.” In: AIAA propulsion and energy 2019 forum, Indianapolis, IN, 19–22 August 2019, p. 4505.
11.
BoddupalliS-S. “Estimating demand for an electric vertical landing and takeoff (eVTOL) air taxi service using discrete choice modeling,”PhD thesis, Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2019.
12.
LombaertsTKaneshigeJSchuetS, et al.“Nonlinear dynamic inversion based attitude control for a hovering quad tiltrotor eVTOL vehicle.” In: AIAA scitech 2019 forum, San Diego, CA, 7–11 January 2019, p. 0134.
13.
BassetP-MVuBDBeaumierP, et al. “Models and methods at ONERA for the presizing of eVTOL hybrid aircraft including analysis of failure scenarios.” Phoenix, AZ: AHS Forum, 2018.
14.
TashreefSIftekharLAzmeen-ur RahmanS. “Design of a crash-resistant PD-controlled quadcopter using coaxial propeller system.” In: 2016 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), Arlington, VA, 7–10 June 2016. IEEE, 2016, pp. 986–992.
15.
SaiedMShraimHFrancisC, et al. “Controllability analysis and motors failures symmetry in a coaxial octorotor,” In: 2015 third international conference on technological advances in electrical, electronics and computer engineering (TAEECE), Beirut, Lebanon, 29 April–1 May 2015, IEEE, 2015, pp. 245–250.
16.
AvantTLeeUKatonaB., et al.“Dynamics, Hover Configurations, and Rotor Failure Restabilization of a Morphing Quadrotor.” In: 2018 annual American control conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, 27–29 June 2018, IEEE, 2018, pp. 4855–4862.
17.
CamachoEFAlbaCB. Model Predictive Control. Secaucus, NJ: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
18.
MayneDQRawlingsJBRaoCV, et al.. “Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality,” Automatica2000; 36(6): 789–814.
19.
GarciaCEPrettDMMorariM. “Model predictive control: theory and practice—a survey.” Automatica1989; 25(3): 335–348.
20.
FukushimaHKimT-HSugieT. “Adaptive model predictive control for a class of constrained linear systems based on the comparison model.” Automatica2007; 43(2): 301–308.
21.
KimJ-S. “Recent advances in adaptive MPC.” In: ICCAS 2010, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 27–30 October 2010. IEEE, 2010. 218–222.
22.
ShammaJS. “An overview of LPV systems.”Control of Linear Parameter Varying Systems with Applications. Secaucus, NJ: Springer, 2012, pp. 3–26.
23.
QuSHeTZhuGG. “Engine EGR valve modeling and switched LPV control considering nonlinear dry friction,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics2020; 25: 1668–1678.
24.
QuSHeTZhuGG. “LPV modeling and switched control for EGR valves with dry friction.” In: 2019 IEEE conference on control technology and applications (CCTA), Hong Kong, China, 19–21 August 2019. IEEE, 2019, pp. 400–405.
25.
DingB, “Dynamic output feedback MPC for LPV systems via near-optimal solutions.” In: Proceedings of the 30th Chinese control conference, Yantai, China, 22–24 July 2011. IEEE, 2011, pp. 3340–3345.
26.
CasavolaAFamularoDFranzeG. “A feedback min-max MPC algorithm for LPV systems subject to bounded rates of change of parameters.” IEEE Trans Automatic Control2002; 47(7): 1147–1153.
27.
SuWQuSZhuGG, et al.“A control-oriented dynamic model of tiltrotor aircraft for urban air mobility.” In: AIAA scitech forum, virtual event, 11–15 January 2021. pp. 0091.
28.
Al-JibooryAKZhuGSweiSS-M, et al. “LPV modeling of a flexible wing aircraft using modal alignment and adaptive gridding methods.” Aerospace Sci Technol2017; 66: 92–102.
PhuongTHBelovMPVan ThuyD. “Adaptive model predictive control for nonlinear elastic electrical transmission servo drives.” In: 2019 IEEE conference of Russian young researchers in electrical and electronic engineering (EIConRus), Saint Petersburg and Moscow, Russia, 28–31 January 2019, IEEE, 2019, pp. 704–708.
31.
KothareMVBalakrishnanVMorarM. “Robust constrained model predictive control using linear matrix inequalities.” Automatica1996; 32(10): 1361–1379.
32.
BoydSEl GhaouiLFeronE, et al.Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1994.
