The in-service loadings on the landing gear are usually complex and from different directions, which lead to the fatigue critical locations in the landing gear structure mostly in multiaxial stress state. A methodology based on the critical plane method was proposed for estimating the fatigue lifetime of outer cylinder of the main landing gear undergoing variable amplitude (VA) multiaxial proportional loading. The orientation of the critical plane was determined by the so-called maximum variance method. The Bannantine–Socie’s cycle counting method and Miner’s linear rule were applied with Zhang–Yao’s criterion in this research. The calculated results on the fatigue lifetime of the outer cylinder were compared with the experimental data. The results indicate that the methodology proposed in this article is a sound method for fatigue life prediction of engineering components bearing complex VA multiaxial fatigue loading.
CurreyNS. Aircraft Landing Gear Design: Principle and Practice. S.W., Washington, DC: AIAA, 1988, pp. 62–64.
2.
RaymerDP. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach. S.W., Washington, DC: AIAA, 1989, pp. 229.
3.
MonclarP. Landing gear technology programmes. In: AIAA international air and space symposium and exposition: The next 100 Years, Dayton, OH, 14–17 July 2003, 2003.
4.
The chief committee of aircraft design manual. Aircraft Design Manual Book 14: Taking-Off and Landing Devices Design. Beijing: Committee of Aircraft Design Manual, Aviation Industry Press, 2002; 442–465(in Chinese).
5.
ShaoYQ. Durability analysis method for typical details of landing gear structure. Aircr Des1994; 4: 12–30. (in Chinese).
6.
ZhuZHLaRosaMMaJ. Fatigue life estimation of helicopter landing probe based on dynamic simulation. J Aircr2009; 46(5): 1533–1543.
7.
XueCJDaiJHWeiT, et al.Structural optimization of a nose landing gear considering its fatigue life. J Aircr2012; 49(1): 225–236.
8.
FrancoLALLourençoNJGraçaMLA, et al.Fatigue fracture of a nose landing gear in a military transport aircraft. Eng Fail Anal2006; 13: 474–479.
9.
InfanteVReisLde FreitasM. Failure analysis of landing gears trunnions due to service. Eng Fail Anal2014; 41: 118–123.
10.
InfanteVFernandesLFreitasM, et al.Failure analysis of a nose landing gear fork. Eng Fail Anal2017; 82: 554–565.
11.
HooleJSartorPBookerJD, et al.Comparison of surrogate modeling methods for finite element analysis of landing gear loads. In: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020-0681, Orlando, FL, 6–10 January 2020.
12.
LomaxTL. Structural Loads Analysis for Commercial Aircraft: Theory and PracticeAIAA Education Series. Reston: AIAA, 1996.
13.
CetinkayaBOzkolI. Evaluation of critical parameters in the design of a trainer aircraft landing gear. In: 2017 8th international conference on mechanical and aerospace engineering (ICMAE), Prague, Czech Republic, 22–25 July 2017, 2017, pp. 391–394.
BrownMWMillerKJ. A theory for fatigue failure under multiaxial stress–strain conditions. Proc Inst Mech Eng1973; 187(65): 745–755.
16.
FatemiASocieDF. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading. Fat Frac Eng Mat Struct1988; 11(3): 149–165.
17.
McDiarmidDL. A general criterion for high cycle multiaxial fatigue failure. Fat Frac Eng Mat Struct1991; 14(4): 429–453.
18.
ShangDGWangDJ. A new multiaxial fatigue damage model based on the critical plane approach. Int J Fatigue1998; 20(3): 241–245.
19.
BertoFLazzarinPYatesJR. Multiaxial fatigue of V-notched steel specimens: a non-conventional application of the local energy method. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct2011; 34(11): 921–943.
20.
SusmelLLazzarinP. A bi-parametric Wöhler curve for high cycle multiaxial fatigue assessment. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2002; 25(1): 63–78.
21.
WangYSusmelL. The modified Manson-Coffin curve method to estimate fatigue lifetime under complex constant and variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue loading. Int J Fatigue2016; 83(2): 135–149.
22.
LuoPYaoWWangY, et al.A survey on fatigue life analysis approaches for metallic notched components under multi-axial loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng G: J Aerosp Eng2019; 233(10): 3870–3890.
23.
ZhangC-CYaoW-X. An improved multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion based on critical plane approach. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2010; 34(5): 337–344.
24.
PapadopoulosIDavoliPGorlaC, et al.A comparative study of multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria for metals. Int J Fatigue1997; 19(3): 219–235.
25.
WangYYaoW. Evaluation and comparison of several multiaxial fatigue criteria. Int J Fatigue2004; 26(1): 17–25.
26.
SusmelL. A simple and efficient numerical algorithm to determine the orientation of the critical plane in multiaxial fatigue problems. Int J Fatigue2010; 32(11): 1875–1883.
27.
WangYFaruqNZSusmelL. Evaluation of different techniques in estimating orientation of crack initiation planes and fatigue lifetime under complex multiaxial loading paths. Int J Fatigue2017; 100: 521–529.
28.
BannantineJASocieDF. A multiaxial fatigue life estimation technique. In: MitchelMRLandgrafRW (eds) ASTM Symposium on Advances in Fatigue Lifetime Predictive Techniques, STP 1122. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing Materials, 1992, pp. 249–275.
29.
WuXR.Handbook of mechanical properties of aircraft structural metals, Vol.1 Static Strength. Fatigue/Durability. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 1996: 308–312. (in Chinese).
