The present article deals with the conceptual design of a new medium short takeoff and landing tactical transport aircraft, which is intended to expand the institutional capabilities of the Colombian Air Force in terms of versatility and flexibility. An original design strategy was developed during the conceptual design, combining classical methodologies and high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. This methodology allowed the aircraft to be assessed in a single design space, based on its design requirements, mission, and applicable airworthiness standards. Once obtained a baseline concept, the aerodynamic study focused on the flow around two types of wingtip devices: tip tanks and blended winglets. These devices were designed to optimize the performance capabilities of the aircraft, while keeping simple certification procedures. Wind tunnel experiments and CFD simulations were carried out to evaluate and select the best configuration. Lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficient charts, along with vorticity contours, are presented. Results showed that blended winglets have a significant potential for improving aircraft performance without severe structural weight penalties, allowing additional payload capabilities and/or increased range and fuel savings. Finally, the optimized aircraft is compared to major competitors in order to discuss and highlight its main advantages and feasibility for future production.
NortonB. STOL progenitors: the technology path to a large STOL aircraft and the C-17A. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2002.
2.
EdiP. The development of n-250 military version. WSEAS Transactions Fluid Mech2006; 1(8): 832–837.
3.
MenarchikD. Powerlift–getting to desert storm: strategic transportation and strategy in the new world order. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1993.
4.
Bravo-MosqueraPDCisneros-InsuastiNDMosquera-RivadeneiraF, et al.Stem learning based on aircraft design: an interdisciplinary strategy developed to science clubs colombia. Cienc Poder Aéreo2019; 14(1): 204–227.
5.
MoránJJDReinaJJReinaRJ. Transporte aéreo estratégico militar en las operaciones militares modernas. Ciencia y Poder Aéreo (Spanish version)2019; 14(1): 114–147.
6.
AgencyEAS. Certification specifications for normal, utility, aerobatic, and commuter category aeroplanes-Cs-23, 2012.
7.
FrischtakCR. Learning and technical progress in the commuter aircraft industry: An analysis of Embraer's experience. Res Pol1994; 23(5): 601–612.
8.
WilliamsLJ. Small transport aircraft technology. Stanford, CA: Scientific and Technical Information Branch, National Aeronautics and Space, 1983, Vol. 460.
9.
NicolosiFDella VecchiaPCorcioneS. Design and aerodynamic analysis of a twin-engine commuter aircraft. Aerosp Sci Technol2015; 40: 1–16.
10.
CorcioneSNicolosiFDella VecchiaP. Wind tunnel tests of a new commuter aircraft. In: 22th AIDAA Conference, Linkoping, September2013.
11.
NicolosiFCorcioneSDella VecchiaP. Commuter aircraft aerodynamic characteristics through wind tunnel tests. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Tech2016; 88(4): 523–534.
12.
NicolosiFDe MarcoADella VecchiaP. Stability, flying qualities and longitudinal parameter estimation of a twin-engine cs-23 certified light aircraft. Aerosp Sci Technol2013; 24(1): 226–240.
NicolosiFDe MarcoAVecchiaPD. Flight tests, performances, and flight certification of a twin-engine light aircraft. J Aircraft2011; 48(1): 177–192.
15.
Della VecchiaPNicolosiF. Aerodynamic guidelines in the design and optimization of new regional turboprop aircraft. Aerosp Sci Technol2014; 38: 88–104.
16.
LappasIIkenagaA. Conceptual design and performance optimization of a tip device for a regional turboprop aircraft. Aerospace2019; 6(10): 107.
17.
Bravo-MosqueraPDCerón-MuñozHDDíaz-VázquezG, et al.Conceptual design and cfd analysis of a new prototype of agricultural aircraft. Aerosp Sci Technol2018; 80: 156–176.
18.
KaparosPPPapadopoulosCYakinthosK. Conceptual design methodology of a box wing aircraft: a novel commercial airliner. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerosp Eng2018; 232(14): 2651–2662.
19.
HosseiniSAli Vaziri-ZanjaniMReza OvesyH. Conceptual design and analysis of an affordable truss-braced wing regional jet aircraft. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerosp Eng2020. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0954410020923060
20.
Bravo-MosqueraPDAbdallaAMCerón-MuñozHD, et al.Integration assessment of conceptual design and intake aerodynamics of a non-conventional air-to-ground fighter aircraft. Aerosp Sci Technol2019; 86: 497–519.
21.
IwaniukAWiśniowskiW. Optimization of small aircraft parameters in the initial phase of the project. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerospace Eng2017; 231(12): 2248–2258.
22.
IwaniukAPiwekK. Preliminary design and optimization for fleet to be used in the small air transport system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerosp Eng2018; 232(14): 2615–2626.
23.
VouvakosXKallinderisYMenounouP. Preliminary design correlations for twin civil turboprops and comparison with jet aircraft. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Tech2010; 82(2): 126–133.
24.
MarinusBGPoppeJ. Data and design models for military turbo-propeller aircraft. Aerosp Sci Technol2015; 41: 63–80.
25.
MarinusBGMaisonJ. Fuel weight estimates of military turbo-propeller transport aircraft. Aerosp Sci Technol2016; 55: 458–464.
26.
MarinusBGQuodbachL. Data and design models for civil turbopropeller aircraft. J Aircraft2020; 57: 1–16.
RaymerD. Aircraft design: a conceptual approach. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 2018.
29.
TorenbeekE. Synthesis of subsonic airplane design: an introduction to the preliminary design of subsonic general aviation and transport aircraft, with emphasis on layout, aerodynamic design, propulsion and performance. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
30.
ANSYS Fluent. Ansys fluent theory guide. USA: ANSYS Inc, 2011, Vol. 15317, pp. 724–746.
Della VecchiaPDanieleED’AmatoE. An airfoil shape optimization technique coupling parsec parameterization and evolutionary algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol2014; 32(1): 103–110.
33.
MerryishaSRajendranP. Review of winglets on tip vortex, drag and airfoil geometry. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci2019; 63(2): 218–237.
34.
WhitcombRT. A design approach and selected wind tunnel results at high subsonic speeds for wing-tip mounted winglets. Washington, DC: NASA Lang-ley Research Center, 1976.
35.
MirzaeiMKarimiMHVaziriMA. An investigation of a tactical cargo aircraft aft body drag reduction based on cfd analysis and wind tunnel tests. Aerosp Sci Technol2012; 23(1): 263–269.
36.
SadraeyMH. Aircraft design: a systems engineering approach. New Hampshire: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
37.
Cerón-MuñozHDCatalanoFM. Experimental analysis of the aerodynamic characteristics adaptive of multi-winglets. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerosp Eng2006; 220(3): 209–215.
38.
WeiZMeijianS. Design optimization of aerodynamic shapes of a wing and its winglet using modified quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerospace Eng2014; 228(9): 1638–1647.
39.
ZhangGPeyadaNGoTH, et al.Design and investigation of a bio-inspired ventilated flapping wing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerosp Eng2015; 229(4): 747–763.
40.
SiddiqiZLeeJ. A computational fluid dynamics investigation of subsonic wing designs for unmanned aerial vehicle application. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerosp Eng2019; 233(15): 5543–5552.
41.
CatalanoF. The new closed circuit wind tunnel of the aircraft laboratory of university of sao paulo, brazil. In: 24th international congress of the aeronautical sciencies ICAS, Yokohama, September 2004.
42.
SorensenJNShenWZMikkelsenR. Wall correction model for wind tunnels with open test section. AIAA J2006; 44(8): 1890–1894.
43.
MavriplisDJVassbergJCTinocoEN, et al.Grid quality and resolution issues from the drag prediction workshop series. J Aircraft2009; 46(3): 935–950.
44.
EshelbyM. Aircraft performance: theory and practice. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 2000.
