This article proposed an extended state observer (ESO)–based output feedback control scheme for rigid spacecraft pose tracking without velocity feedback, which accounts for inertial uncertainties, external disturbances, and control input constraints. In this research, the 6-DOF tracking error dynamics is described by the exponential coordinates on SE(3). A novel continuous finite-time ESO is proposed to estimate the velocity information and the compound disturbance, and the estimations are utilized in the control law design. The ESO ensures a finite-time uniform ultimately bounded stability of the observation states, which is proved utilizing the homogeneity method. A non-singular finite-time terminal sliding mode controller based on super-twisting technology is proposed, which would drive spacecraft tracking the desired states. The other two observer-based controllers are also proposed for comparison. The superiorities of the proposed control scheme are demonstrated by theory analyses and numerical simulations.
SunLHuoWJiaoZ. Disturbance-observer-based robust relative pose control for spacecraft rendezvous and proximity operations under input saturation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2018; 54(4): 1605–1617. DOI: 10.1109/taes.2018.2798239.
2.
LeeDVukovichG. Adaptive sliding mode control for spacecraft body-fixed hovering in the proximity of an asteroid. Aerosp Sci Technology2015; 46: 471–483. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.09.001.
3.
GuiHVukovichG. Finite-time output-feedback position and attitude tracking of a rigid body. Automatica2016; 74: 270–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.08.003.
4.
ZhaoLJiaYHuoW, et al.Adaptive output feedback tracking control for 6 DOF spacecraft formation flying under actuator faults. In: The 27th Chinese control and decision conference (2015 CCDC), Qingdao, China, 23–25 May 2015, 2015, pp. 2303–2308. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2015.7162305
5.
FilipeNValverdeATsiotrasP. Pose tracking without linearand angular-velocity feedback using dual quaternions. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2016; 52(1): 411–422. DOI: 10.1109/taes.2015.150046.
6.
HuangYJiaY. Output feedback robust H∞ control for spacecraft rendezvous system subject to input saturation: a gain scheduled approach. J Franklin Inst2019; 356(7): 3899–3921. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.12.023.
7.
LizarraldeFWenJT. Attitude control without angular velocity measurement: a passivity approach. IEEE Trans Automat Contr1996; 41(3): 468–472. DOI: 10.1109/9.486654.
8.
TsiotrasP. Further passivity results for the attitude control problem. IEEE Trans Automat Contr1998; 43(11): 1597–1600. DOI: 10.1109/9.728877.
9.
AkellaMR. Rigid body attitude tracking without angular velocity feedback. Syst Control Lett2001; 42(4): 321–326. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6911(00)00102-X.
10.
SinglaPSubbaraoKJunkinsJL. Adaptive output feedback control for spacecraft rendezvous and docking under measurement uncertainty. J Guid Control Dyn2006; 29(4): 892–902. DOI: 10.2514/1.17498.
11.
TayebiA. Unit quaternion-based output feedback for the attitude tracking problem. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2008; 53(6): 1516–1520. DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2008.927789.
12.
PanHWongHKapilaV. Output feedback control for spacecraft with coupled translation and attitude dynamics. In: 43rd IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC) (IEEE Cat No.04CH37601), Nassau, Bahamas, 14–17 December 2004, 2004, pp. 4453–4458, Vol. 4. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2004.1429452.
13.
ZouA-MKumarKD. Adaptive attitude control of spacecraft without velocity measurements using chebyshev neural network. Acta Astronaut2010; 66(5–6): 769–779. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.08.020
14.
ZouA-MKumarKD. Adaptive output feedback control of spacecraft formation flying using chebyshev neural networks. J Aerosp Eng2011; 24(3): 361–372. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000072.
15.
ZouAMDev KumarKHouZG. Quaternion-based adaptive output feedback attitude control of spacecraft using chebyshev neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw2010; 21(9): 1457–1471. DOI: 10.1109/tnn.2010.2050333.
16.
HuQZhangJ. Relative position finite-time coordinated tracking control of spacecraft formation without velocity measurements. ISA Trans2015; 54: 60–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.08.004. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.08.004.
17.
HuangYJiaY. Distributed finite‐time output feedback synchronisation control for six DOF spacecraft formation subject to input saturation. IET Control Theor Appl2018; 12(4): 532–542. DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.0842.
18.
ZouA-M. Finite-time output feedback attitude tracking control for rigid spacecraft. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol2014; 22(1): 338–345. DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2013.2246836.
19.
ZouA-Mde RuiterAHJKumarKD. Finite-time output feedback attitude control for rigid spacecraft under control input saturation. J Franklin Inst2016; 353(17): 4442–4470. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.08.013.
20.
HuQZhangJ. Bounded finite-time coordinated attitude control via output feedback for spacecraft formation. J Aerosp Eng2015; 28(5): 04014129. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000468.
21.
HuangYJiaY. Fixed-time consensus tracking control of second-order multi-agent systems with inherent nonlinear dynamics via output feedback. Nonlinear Dyn2017; 91(2): 1289–1306. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-017-3945-8.
22.
LiBQinKXiaoB, et al.Finite-time extended state observer based fault tolerant output feedback control for attitude stabilization. ISA Trans2019; 91: 11–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.01.039.
23.
LiQYuanJZhangB. Extended state observer based output control for spacecraft rendezvous and docking with actuator saturation. ISA Trans2019; 88: 37–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2018.11.048.
24.
ZhangKDuanG-RMaM-D. Dynamic output feedback sliding mode control for spacecraft hovering without velocity measurements. J Franklin Inst2019; 356(4): 1991–2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.01.030.
25.
AbdessameudATayebiA. Attitude synchronization of a group of spacecraft without velocity measurements. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2009; 54(11): 2642–2648.
26.
LiBHuQGuoL. Observer based inverse optimal attitude stabilization control of spacecraft with uncertainties. In: Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Chinese guidance, navigation and control conference, Yantai, China, 8–10 August 2014, pp. 269–274. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/cgncc.2014.7007244.
27.
YanRWuZ. Spacecraft attitude tracking via robust disturbance observer. In: 29th Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC), Chongqing, China, 28–30 May 2017, 2017, pp. 7415–7420. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2017.7978526.
28.
LiBHuQYangY. Continuous finite-time extended state observer based fault tolerant control for attitude stabilization. Aerosp Sci Technol2019; 84: 204–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.10.006.
29.
HanJ. From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2009; 56(3): 900–906. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2011621.
30.
PukdeboonC. Anti-disturbance inverse optimal control for spacecraft position and attitude maneuvers with input saturation. Adv Mech Eng2016; 8(5): 1–14. DOI: 10.1177/1687814016649887.
31.
LiBHuQMaG. Extended state observer based robust attitude control of spacecraft with input saturation. Aerosp Sci Technol2016; 50: 173–182.
32.
ZhangJYeDSunZ, et al.Extended state observer based robust adaptive control on se(3) for coupled spacecraft tracking maneuver with actuator saturation and misalignment. Acta Astronaut2018; 143: 221–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.11.034.
33.
ZouA-Mde RuiterAHJKumarKD. Disturbance observer-based attitude control for spacecraft with input MRS. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2019; 55(1): 384–396. DOI: 10.1109/taes.2018.2852369.
34.
GritliHBelghithS. LMI-based synthesis of a robust saturated controller for an underactuated mechanical system subject to motion constraints. Eur J Control2021; 57: 179–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2020.04.004.
35.
EsmaeilzadehSMGolestaniMMobayenS. Chattering-free fault-tolerant attitude control with fast fixed-time convergence for flexible spacecraft. Int J Control Autom Syst2020; 19: 767–776. DOI: 10.1007/s12555-020-0043-3.
36.
MobayenSMostafaviSFekihA. Non-singular fast terminal sliding mode control with disturbance observer for underactuated robotic manipulators. IEEE Access2020; 8: 198067–198077. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034712.
37.
GolestaniMEsmaeilzadehSMMobayenS. Fixed-time control for high-precision attitude stabilization of flexible spacecraft. Eur J Control2021; 57: 222–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2020.05.006.
BasinMYuPShtesselY. Finite‐ and fixed‐time differentiators utilising HOSM techniques. IET Control Theory Appl2017; 11(8): 1144–1152. DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2016.1256.
40.
JunkinsJLSchaubH. Analytical mechanics of space systems. 2nd ed. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009.
41.
LeeDSanyalAKButcherEA. Asymptotic tracking control for spacecraft formation flying with decentralized collision avoidance. J Guid Control Dyn2015; 38(4): 587–600. DOI: 10.2514/1.G000101.
42.
BulloFMurrayRM. Proportional derivative (PD) control on the euclidean group. In: European control conference, Zurich, Switzerland, 11 August, 1995, 1091–1097. CiteSeer.
43.
BhatSPBernsteinDS. Geometric homogeneity with applications to finite-time stability. Math Control Signals Syst2005; 17(2): 101–127. DOI: 10.1007/s00498-005-0151-x.
44.
HuQJiangB. Continuous finite-time attitude control for rigid spacecraft based on angular velocity observer. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2018; 54(3): 1082–1092. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2017.2773340.
45.
PerruquettiWFloquetTMoulayE. Finite-time observers: application to secure communication. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2008; 53(1): 356–360.
46.
YanRWuZ. Attitude stabilization of flexible spacecrafts via extended disturbance observer based controller. Acta Astronaut2017; 133: 73–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.01.004.
