Rarefied gas flow over a backward-facing step (BFS) is often encountered in separating flows prevalent in aerodynamic flows, engine flows, condensers, space vehicles, heat transfer systems, and microflows. Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) is a powerful tool to investigate such flows. The purpose of this research is to assess the impact of Mach number and wall temperature on the flow and surface properties in the transitional flow regime. The Mach numbers considered are 5, 10, 25, 30, and the ratio of the temperature of the wall to that of freestream considered are 1, 2, 4, 8. The Reynolds number for the cases studied is 8.6, 17.2, 43, and 51.7, respectively. Typically the flow properties near the wall are found to increase with both Mach number and wall temperature owing to compressibility and viscous dissipation effects. The variation in flow properties is more sensitive to Mach number than the wall temperature. The surface properties are found to decrease with Mach number and increase with wall temperature. Moreover, in the wake of the step, the vortex’s recirculation length is reasonably independent of both free stream Mach number and wall temperature, whereas it decreases with Knudsen number.
KumarSVengadesanS.The effect of fin oscillation in heat transfer enhancement in separated flow over a backward facing step. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer2019; 128: 954–963.
2.
Morgan K, Periaux J, Thomasset F. Analysis of laminar flow over a backward facing step. F. Vieweg & Sohn 1984. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-14242-3.
3.
ChenLAsaiKNonomuraT, et al. A review of backward-facing step (BFS) flow mechanisms, heat transfer and control. Thermal Sci Eng Progr2018; 6: 194–216.
4.
ArmalyBFDurstFPereiraJCF, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow. J Fluid Mech1983; 127: 473.
5.
LeitePHMSantosWFN.Computational analysis of a rarefied hypersonic flow over backward-facing steps. J Thermophys Heat Transfer2019; 33: 749–713.
6.
GuoGLuoQ.Flowfield structure characteristics of the hypersonic flow over a cavity: from the continuum to the transition flow regimes. Acta Astronaut2019; 161: 87–100.
7.
Al-KouzWSariMKiwanS, et al. Rarefied flow and heat transfer characteristics over a vertical stretched surface. Adv Mech Eng2016; 8: 168781401666621–168781401666.
8.
WuZDongPLeiG, et al. Study on the micro-scale effect in the micro–nano organic pores of a shale reservoir. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2018; 232: 491–501.
9.
MohammadzadehARoohiENiazmandH, et al. Thermal and second-law analysis of a micro- or nanocavity using direct-simulation Monte Carlo. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys May 2012; 85: 056310..
10.
Gad-el-HakM.The fluid mechanics of microdevices – the Freeman scholar lecture. J. Fluids Eng1999; 121: 5–33.
11.
RoohiEDarbandiM.Extending the Navier–Stokes solutions to transition regime in two-dimensional micro- and nanochannel flows using information preservation scheme. Phys Fluids2009; 21: 082001–082.
12.
RapaportDC.The art of molecular dynamics simulation by D. C. Rapaport. Cambridge Core, Apr. 2004.
13.
BirdGA.Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
14.
CercignaniC.The Boltzmann equation and its applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
15.
AminfarHMohammadpourfardM.Lattice Boltzmann BGK model for gas flow in a microchannel. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2008; 222: 1855–1860.
16.
LeHMoinPKimJ.Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. J Fluid Mech1997; 330: 349–374.
17.
LiakosAMalamatarisNA.Topological study of steady state, three dimensional flow over a backward facing step. Computers & Fluids2015; 118: 1–18.
18.
BaumE.An interaction model of a supersonic laminar boundary layer on sharpand rounded backward facing steps. AIAA Journal1968; 6: 440–447.
19.
IngerGR.Supersonic laminar flow past a small rear-facing step. AIAA J1974; 12: 739–740.
GaiSLHayneMJ.Heat transfer behind a step in high-enthalpy laminar hypersonic flow. J Thermophys Heat Transfer2010; 24: 839–841.
22.
ChoiHLeeDLeeD.Complex microscale flow simulations using Langmuir slip condition. Numer Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications2005; 48: 407–425.
23.
HsiehT-YHongZ-CPanY-C.Flow characteristics of three-dimensional microscale backward-facing step flows. Numer Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications2010; 57: 331–345. Mar. doi: 10.1080/10407780903582992.
24.
BeskokA.Validation of a new velocity-slip model for separated gas microflows. Numer Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals2001; 40: 451–471.
25.
CelikBEdisFO.Computational investigation of micro backward-facing step duct flow in slip regime. Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys Eng2007; 11: 319–331.
26.
Rached J, Daher N. Numerical prediction of slip flow and heat transfer in microchannels. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Engineering Students Conference, American University of Beirut, 2007, pp. 109–114.
27.
BaysalOErbasNKokluM.Control of separated flow past a backward facing step in a microchannel. Microfluid Nanofluid2004; 1: 86–92.
XueHXuBWeiY, et al. Unique behaviors of a backward-facing step flow at microscale. Numer Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications2005; 47: 251–268.
30.
KursunUKapatJS.Modeling of microscale gas flows in transition regime part I: flow over backward facing steps. Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys Eng2; 11: 15–30.
31.
BaoFLinJ.Continuum simulation of the microscale backward-facing step flow in a transition regime. Numer Heat Transfer, Part A: Appl2011; 59: 616–632.
32.
DarbandiMRoohiE.DSMC simulation of subsonic flow through nanochannels and micro/nano backward-facing steps. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2011; 38: 1443–1448.
33.
GavasaneAAgrawalABhandarkarU.Study of rarefied gas flows in backward facing micro-step using direct simulation Monte Carlo. Vacuum2018; 155: 249–259.
34.
PalhariniRCScanlonTJReeseJM.Aerothermodynamic comparison of two- and three-dimensional rarefied hypersonic cavity flows. J Spacecraft Rockets2014; 51: 1619–1630.
35.
PalhariniRCSantosWF.The impact of the length-to-depth ratio on aerodynamic surface quantities of a rarefied hypersonic cavity flow. Aerosp Sci Technol2019; 88: 110–125.
36.
RenWLiuHJinS.An asymptotic-preserving Monte Carlo method for the Boltzmann equation. J Comput Phys2014; 276: 380–404.
37.
ZhangBLiuHJinS.An asymptotic preserving Monte Carlo method for the multispecies Boltzmann equation. J Comput Phys2016; 305: 575–588.
38.
LekzianEEbrahimiAParhizkarH.Performance analysis of microelectromechanical thrusters using a direct simulation Monte Carlo solver. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2018; 232: 1212–1222. Jun. doi: 10.1177/0954410017691066.
39.
MyoKSZhouWLeeKL, et al. Direct Monte Carlo simulation of nanoscale mixed gas bearings. Advances in Mechanical Engineering2015; 7: 168781401558952–168781401558. Jun. doi: 10.1177/1687814015589528.
40.
GladkovDTapiaJ-JAlbertsS, et al. Graphics processing unit based direct simulation Monte Carlo. SIMULATION2012; 88: 680–693. Jun. doi: 10.1177/0037549711418787.
41.
ZuppardiGVisoneGVottaR, et al. Analysis of aerodynamic performances of experimental flying test bed in High-Altitude flight. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2011; 225: 247–258. Mar. doi: 10.1243/09544100JAERO873.
42.
NourmohammadzadehMRahnamaMJafariS, et al. Microchannel flow simulation in transition regime using lattice boltzmann method. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2012; 226: 552–562., Feb. doi: 10.1177/0954406211413959.
43.
ZuppardiGPaternaD.Influence of rarefaction on the computation of aerodynamic parameters in hypersonic flow. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2002; 216: 277–290. Jun. doi: 10.1243/095441002321029026.
44.
SunYHChanWKLiuNY.A slip model for gas lubrication based on an effective viscosity concept. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology2003; 217: 187–195. Mar. doi: 10.1243/135065003765714836.
45.
YangA-S.Plume impingement investigation using Monte-Carlo computations. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2006; 220: 365–373. Oct. doi: 10.1243/09544100jaero84.
46.
FangYLiouWW.Computations of the flow and heat transfer in microdevices using DSMC with implicit boundary conditions. J. Heat Transfer2002; 124: 338–345.
47.
WangMLiZ.Simulations for gas flows in microgeometries using the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2004; 25: 975–985.
48.
RoohiEDarbandiMMirjaliliV.Direct simulation Monte Carlo solution of subsonic flow through micro/nanoscale channels. J Heat Transfer2009; 131.
49.
OranESOhCKCybykBZ.Direct simulation Monte Carlo: recent advances and applications. Annu Rev Fluid Mech1998; 30: 403–441.
50.
Gad-el-HakM. Molecular-based microfluidic simulation models. In: The MEMS Handbook-3 Volume Set, CRC Press, 2019, pp. 116–142.
51.
AbeT.Generalized scheme of the no-time-counter scheme for the DSMC in rarefied gas flow analysis. Computers Fluids1993; 22: 253–257.
52.
RoohiEStefanovSShoja-SaniA, et al. A generalized form of the Bernoulli trial collision scheme in DSMC: derivation and evaluation. J Comput Phys2018; 354: 476–492.
53.
StefanovSK.On DSMC calculations of rarefied gas flows with small number of particles in cells. SIAM J Sci Comput2011; 33: 677–702.
54.
GoshayeshiBRoohiEStefanovS.A novel simplified Bernoulli trials collision scheme in the direct simulation Monte Carlo with intelligence over particle distances. Phys Fluids2015; 27: 104–107.
55.
SaadatiSARoohiE.Detailed investigation of flow and thermal field in micro/nano nozzles using simplified Bernoulli trial (SBT) collision scheme in DSMC. Aerosp Sci Technol2015; 46: 236–255.
56.
GoshayeshiBRoohiEStefanovS.DSMC simulation of hypersonic flows using an improved SBT-TAS technique. J Comput Phys2015; 303: 28–44.
57.
TaheriERoohiEStefanovS.On the convergence of the simplified Bernoulli trial collision scheme in rarefied Fourier flow. Phys Fluids2017; 29: 062003–062.
58.
PrasanthPKakkasseryJK.Direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC): a numerical method for transition-regime flows – a review. J Indian Inst Sci2013; 86: 169–192.
59.
RoohiEStefanovS.Collision partner selection schemes in DSMC: from micro/nano flows to hypersonic flows. Phys Reports2016; 656: 1–38.
60.
PrasanthPKakkasseryJK.Molecular models for simulation of rarefied gas flows using direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Fluid Dyn Res2008; 40: 233–252.
61.
BorgnakkeCLarsenPS.Statistical collision model for Monte Carlo simulation of polyatomic gas mixture. J Comput Phys1975; 18: 405–420.
62.
SunQFanJBoydID.Improved sampling techniques for the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Comput Fluids2009; 38: 475–479.
63.
AlexanderFJGarciaALAlderBJ.Cell size dependence of transport coefficients in stochastic particle algorithms. Phys Fluids1998; 10: 1540–1542.
64.
AlexanderFJGarciaALAlderBJ.Erratum: ‘Cell size dependence of transport coefficients in stochastic particle algorithms’ [Phys. Fluids10, 1540 (1998. Phys Fluids2000; 12: 731–731)].
65.
HadjiconstantinouNG.Analysis of discretization in the direct simulation Monte Carlo. Phys Fluids2000; 12: 2634–2638.
66.
ZhouDKadakshamATJMurthy PeriMD, et al. Nanoparticle detachment using shock waves. ProcIMechE, Part N: J Nanoengineering Nanosystems2005; 219: 91–102.
67.
SunZ-XTangZHeY-L, et al. Proper cell dimension and number of particles per cell for DSMC. Computers Fluids2011; 50: 1–9.
68.
GabrielE, et al. Open MPI: Goals, concept, and design of a next generation MPI implementation. In: European parallel virtual machine/message passing interface users’ group meeting, 2004, pp. 97–104.
69.
ScanlonTJRoohiEWhiteC, et al. An open source, parallel DSMC code for rarefied gas flows in arbitrary geometries. Computers Fluids2010; 39: 2078–2089.
70.
JasakHJemcovATukovicZ, et al.OpenFOAM: a C++ library for complex physics simulations. Int Workshop Coupled Methods Numerical Dyn2007; 1000: 1–20.
71.
AkhlaghiHBalajMRoohiE.Direct simulation Monte Carlo investigation of mixed supersonic–subsonic flow through micro-/nano-scale channels. Phys Scr2013; 88: 015401.
72.
GuoKLiawG. A review-boundary conditions for the DSMC method. In: 35th AIAA thermophysics conference, 2001, pp. 2953.
73.
LeitePHMSantosWFN.Computational analysis of the flow field structure of a non-reacting hypersonic flow over forward-facing steps. J Fluid Mech2015; 763: 460–499.
74.
JinXWangBChengX, et al. The effects of Maxwellian accommodation coefficient and free-stream Knudsen number on rarefied hypersonic cavity flows. Aerosp Sci Technol2020; 97: 105577.
75.
PaolicchiLTLCSantosWFN.Length-to-depth ratio effects on aerodynamic surface quantities of a hypersonic gap flow. AIAA J2018; 56: 780–792.
76.
Cassineli PalhariniRScanlonT.Atmospheric reentry modelling using an open source DSMC code. PhD Thesis, University of Strathclyde, 2014.
77.
U. S. Atmosphere. US standard atmosphere. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1976.
78.
NabapureDSanwalJRajeshS, et al. Investigation of subsonic and hypersonic rarefied gas flow over a backward facing step,”J Phys: Conf Ser2019; 1276: 012007.
79.
Rai SC, Sanwal J and Murthy KR. Simulation of Rarefied Gas Flow in a Rectangular Enclosure. In: Proceedings of the 24th National and 2nd International ISHMT-ASTFE Heat and Mass Transfer Conference (IHMTC-2017), 2017. Begel House Inc.
80.
NabapureDKalluriRCM.DSMC simulation of rarefied gas flow over a forward-facing step. In: ICTEA: International conference on thermal engineering, vol. 2019, May 2019.
81.
NabapureDMurthyRC. DSMC simulation of rarefied gas flow over a wall mounted cube. In: Fluids engineering division summer meeting, 2019, vol. 59032, p. V002T02A071.
82.
NabapureDKalluriRC.Simulation of flow in single and double-sided lid driven square cavities by direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Therm Sci2020; 24: 3031–3045.
83.
BeckerMRobbenFCattolicaR.Velocity distribution functions near the leading edge of a flat plate. AIAA J1974; 12: 1247–1253.
84.
HerminaWL.Monte Carlo simulation of rarefied flow along a flat plate. J Thermophys Heat Transfer1989; 3: 7–12.
85.
GrotowskyIMGBallmannJ.Numerical investigation of hypersonic step-flows. Shock Waves2000; 10: 57–72.
86.
SchäferFBreuerMDurstF.The dynamics of the transitional flow over a backward-facing step. J Fluid Mech2009; 623: 85.
87.
JiMWangM.Sound generation by turbulent boundary-layer flow over small steps. J Fluid Mech2010; 654: 161–193.
88.
JiMWangM.Surface pressure fluctuations on steps immersed in turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech2012; 712: 471–504.
89.
DeepakNGaiS, andA.Neely A computational study of high enthalpy flow over a rearward facing step. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, FL, AIAA Paper, 2010. vol. 444.
90.
BalajMAkhlaghiHRoohiE.Rarefied gas flow behavior in micro/nanochannels under specified wall heat flux. Int J Mod Phys C2015; 26: 1550087.
91.
DarbandiMRoohiE.A hybrid DSMC/Navier-Stokes frame to solve mixed rarefied/nonrarefied hypersonic flows over nano-plate and micro-cylinder. Int J Numer Meth Fluids2013; 72: 937–966.
92.
PalhariniRCScanlonTJWhiteC.Chemically reacting hypersonic flows over 3D cavities: flowfield structure characterisation. Comput Fluids2018; 165: 173–187.
93.
RomJSeginerA.Laminar heat transfer to a two-dimensional backward facing step from the high-enthalpy supersonic flow in the shock tube. AIAA J1964; 2: 251–255.
94.
GuptaRScottCMossJ. Surface-slip equations for low-Reynolds-number multicomponent gas flows. In: 19th thermophysics conference, 1984, p. 1732.
