Sinusoidal leading-edge wings have shown a high performance after the stall region. In this study, the role of smart flaps in the aerodynamics of smooth and sinusoidal leading-edge wings at low Reynolds numbers of 29,000, 40,000 and 58,000 is investigated. Four wings with NACA 634-021 profile are firstly designed and then manufactured by a 3 D printer. Beam bending equation is used to determine the smart flap chord deflection. Next, wind tunnel tests are carried out to measure the lift and drag forces of proposed wings for a wide range of angles of attack, from zero to 36 degrees. Results show that using trailing-edge smart flap in sinusoidal leading-edge wing delays the stall point compared to the same wing without flap. However, a combination of smooth leading-edge wing and smart flap advances the stall. Furthermore, it is found that wings with smart flap generally have a higher lift to drag ratio due to their excellent performance in producing lift.
Van NieropEAAlbenSBrennerMP.How bumps on whale flippers delay stall: an aerodynamic model. Phys Rev Lett2008; 100: 054502.
2.
HassanalianMSalazarRAbdelkefiA.Conceptual design and optimization of a tilt-rotor micro air vehicle. Chin J Aeronaut2019; 32: 369–381.
3.
GoruneyTRockwellD.Flow past a Delta wing with a sinusoidal leading edge: near-surface topology and flow structure. Exp Fluids2009; 47: 321–331.
4.
SudhakarSKarthikeyanNVenkatakrishnanL.Influence of leading edge tubercles on aerodynamic characteristics of a high aspect-ratio UAV. Aerosp Sci Technol2017; 69: 281–289.
5.
MalipeddiAKMahmoudnejadNHoffmannKA.Numerical analysis of effects of leading-edge protuberances on aircraft wing performance. J Aircr2012; 49: 1336–1344.
6.
OzenCARockwellD.Control of vortical structures on a flapping wing via a sinusoidal leading-edge. Phys Fluids2010; 22: 021701.
7.
WangZZhuangM.Leading-edge serrations for performance improvement on a vertical-axis wind turbine at low tip-speed-ratios. Appl Energy2017; 208: 1184–1197.
8.
KumarVVShahDA.Application of tubercles in wind turbine blades: a review. Appl Mech Mater2017; 867: 254–260.
9.
HuangG-YShiahYCBaiC-J, et al. Experimental study of the protuberance effect on the blade performance of a small horizontal axis wind turbine. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2015; 147: 202–211.
10.
CustodioDHenochCJohariH.Cavitation on hydrofoils with leading edge protuberances. Ocean Eng2018; 162: 196–208.
11.
WeiZNewTHCuiYD.An experimental study on flow separation control of hydrofoils with leading-edge tubercles at low Reynolds number. Ocean Eng2015; 108: 336–349.
12.
KeerthiMCRajeshwaranMSKushariA, et al. Effect of leading-edge tubercles on compressor cascade performance. AIAA J2016; 54: 912–923.
13.
JohariHHenochCWCustodioD, et al. Effects of leading-edge protuberances on airfoil performance. AIAA J2007; 45: 2634–2642.
14.
ZverkovIZaninBKozlovV.Disturbances growth in boundary layers on classical and wavy surface wings. AIAA J2008; 46: 3149–3158.
15.
HansenKLKelsoRMDallyBB.Performance variations of leading-edge tubercles for distinct airfoil profiles. AIAA J2011; 49: 185–194.
16.
DropkinACustodioDHenochCW, et al. Computation of flow field around an airfoil with leading-edge protuberances. J Aircr2012; 49: 1345–1355.
17.
ZhangMMWangGFXuJZ.Aerodynamic control of low-Reynolds-number airfoil with leading-edge protuberances. AIAA J2013; 51: 1960–1971.
18.
CaiCZuoZMaedaT, et al. Periodic and aperiodic flow patterns around an airfoil with leading-edge protuberances. Phys Fluids2017; 29: 115110.
19.
CaiCZuoZLiuS, et al. Effect of a single leading-edge protuberance on NACA 634-021 airfoil performance. J Fluids Eng2018; 140: 021108.
20.
BolzonMDKelsoRMArjomandiM.Performance effects of a single tubercle terminating at a swept wing’s tip. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2017; 85: 52–68.
21.
BolzonMDKelsoRMArjomandiM.Force measurements and wake surveys of a swept tubercled wing. J Aerosp Eng2017; 30: 04016085.
22.
AftabSMAAhmadKA.CFD study on NACA 4415 airfoil implementing spherical and sinusoidal tubercle leading edge. PLoS One2017; 12: e0183456.
23.
LinS-YLinY-YBaiC-J, et al. Performance analysis of vertical-axis-wind-turbine blade with modified trailing edge through computational fluid dynamics. Renew Energy2016; 99: 654–662.
24.
PrigentSLBuxtonORHBruceP.Wake of a lifting wing with cut-in sinusoidal trailing edges. AIAA J2017; 55: 1590–1601.
25.
RostamzadehNKelsoRMDallyB.A numerical investigation into the effects of Reynolds number on the flow mechanism induced by a tubercled leading edge. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn2017; 31: 1–32.
26.
GuerreiroJLESousaJ.Low-Reynolds-number effects in passive stall control using sinusoidal leading edges. AIAA J2012; 50: 461–469.
27.
YasudaTFukuiKMatsuoK, et al. Effect of the Reynolds number on the performance of a NACA0012 wing with leading edge protuberance at low Reynolds numbers. Flow Turbul Combust2019; 102: 435–455.
28.
EsmaeiliADelgadoHECSousaJ.Numerical simulations of low-Reynolds-number flow past finite wings with leading-edge protuberances. J Aircr2018; 55: 226–238.
29.
PapadopoulosCKatsiadramisVYakinthosK.Influence of tubercles’ spanwise distribution on swept wings for unmanned aerial vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2020; 00954410020919583.
30.
SreejithBKSathyabhamaA.Experimental and numerical study of laminar separation bubble formation on low Reynolds number airfoil with leading-edge tubercles. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2020; 42: 171.
31.
BolzonMDKelsoRMArjomandiM.Tubercles and their applications. J Aerosp Eng2016; 29: 04015013.
32.
AftabSMARazakNAMohd RafieAS, et al. Mimicking the humpback whale: an aerodynamic perspective. Prog Aerosp Sci2016; 84: 48–69.
33.
ForsterESandersBEastepF. Modelling and sensitivity analysis of a variable geometry trailing edge control surface. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA, 2003.
34.
BolonkinAGilyardGB. Estimated benefits of variable-geometry wing camber control for transport aircraft. NASA/TM-1999-206586, 1999.
35.
PernNJacobJ. Wake vortex mitigation using adaptive airfoils – the piezoelectric arc airfoil. In: 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 1999.
36.
AbdullahEBilCWatkinsS. Application of smart materials for adaptive airfoil shape control. In: 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida, 2009.
DjavareshkianMHEsmaeliA.Application of smart flap for race car wings. Int J Aerodyn2012; 2: 66–92.
39.
BarlasTKvan KuikG.Review of state of the art in smart rotor control research for wind turbines. Progr Aerosp Sci2010; 46: 1–27.
40.
CinquemaniSDianaGFossatiL, et al. A smart structure for wind tunnel investigation of a bridge deck’s vortex-induced torsional motion. Mechatronics2016; 33: 108–120.
41.
ChinnassamyPChenY. Application of computational fluid dynamics on smart wing design. In: 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 2005.
42.
DjavareshkianMHEsmaeliAParsaniA.Aerodynamics of smart flap under ground effect. Aerosp Sci Technol2011; 15: 642–652.
43.
DjavareshkianMHEsmaeiliAParsaniaA.Numerical simulation of smart hydrofoil in marine system. Ocean Eng2013; 73: 16–24.
44.
LeeTGerontakosP.Dynamic stall flow control via a trailing-edge flap. AIAA J2006; 44: 469–480.
45.
LacknerMAvan KuikG.A comparison of smart rotor control approaches using trailing edge flaps and individual pitch control. Wind Energy2010; 13: 117–134.
46.
LiuTMontefortJLiouW, et al. Lift enhancement by static extended trailing edge. J Aircr2007; 44: 1939–1947.
47.
HassanalianMAbdelkefiA.Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: a review. Progr Aerosp Sci2017; 91: 99–131.
48.
Sepahi-YounsiJForouzi FeshalamiBMaadiSR, et al. Boundary layer suction for high-speed air intakes: a review. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2019; 233: 3459–3481.
49.
SamieeADjavareshkianMHForouzi FeshalamiB, et al. Improvement of airfoils aerodynamic efficiency by thermal camber phenomenon at low Reynolds number. J Aerosp Technol Manag2018; 10.
50.
LohryMWCliftonDMartinelliL. Characterization and design of tubercle leading-edge wings. In: Seventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7), Big Island, Hawaii, 2012, pp. 9–13.
51.
CustodioDHenochCWJohariH.Aerodynamic characteristics of finite span wings with leading-edge protuberances. AIAA J2015; 53: 1878–1893.
52.
MuellerTJ.Aerodynamic measurements at low Reynolds numbers for fixed wing micro-air vehicles. Notre Dame University, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 2000.
53.
Forouzi FeshalamiBDjavareshkianMHZareeAH, et al. The role of wing bending deflection in the aerodynamics of flapping micro aerial vehicles in hovering flight. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2019; 233: 3749–3761.
54.
Forouzi FeshalamiBDjavareshkianMYousefiM, et al. Experimental investigation of flapping mechanism of the black-headed gull in forward flight. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2019; 233: 4333–4349.
55.
HansenKLRostamzadehNKelsoRM, et al. Evolution of the streamwise vortices generated between leading edge tubercles. J Fluid Mech2016; 788: 730–766.
56.
RostamzadehNHansenKLKelsoRM, et al. The formation mechanism and impact of streamwise vortices on NACA 0021 airfoil’s performance with undulating leading edge modification. Phys Fluids2014; 26: 107101.
57.
WinslowJOtsukaHGovindarajanB, et al. Basic understanding of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers (104–105). J Aircr2018; 55: 1050–1061.
