First attempt to determine the critical inlet pressure for aircraft pumps with a numerical approach that considers vapor cavitation and air aeration

Abstract

Critical inlet pressure (CIP) is a key parameter for ensuring the long life and steady operation of aircraft piston pumps. In the past, this parameter was determined through experimental methods that had drawbacks such as a long duration and narrow application range. To identify an alternate approach that can be substituted for the traditional approach, a numerical model for determining the CIP that considers the dynamic effects of the transient period is proposed in this paper. First, a dynamic model of the pressure-controlled piston pump was established in the form of differential equations based on the lumped parameter method. Next, the fluid model for vapor cavitation and air aeration was derived using homogeneous mixture theory with consideration of the effects of compressibility of both liquid and gaseous phases. Simulation investigation highlighted how the shaft speed, inlet pressure, and transient time influence the fluid properties inside the piston chamber, and a method for determining the CIP both for steady and transient conditions is presented. Finally, tests were conducted on an aircraft piston pump in open-circuit applications for verifying the applicability of the proposed numerical model.

Keywords

Aircraft piston pump numerical model critical inlet pressure cavitation lumped parameters transient conditions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Totten GE, Sun YH, Bishop RJ, et al. Hydraulic system cavitation: a review. SAE paper 982036; 1998.

Guo

Chen

, et al. Hydraulic piston pump in civil aircraft: current status, future directions and critical technologies. Chin J Aeronaut 2019; 33: 16–30.

SAE international. Aerospace-system integration factors that affect hydraulic pump life. Report No.: AIR1922B, February 2017. Warrendale, PA: Aerospace, A-6C4 Power Sources Committee.

Goncalves

Patella

. Numerical simulation of cavitating flows with homogeneous models. Comput Fluids 2009; 38: 1682–1696.

Peng

Shimizu

. Progress in numerical simulation of cavitating water jets. J Hydrodyn 2013; 25: 502–509.

Kunz

Boger

Stinebring

, et al. A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Comput Fluids 2000; 29: 849–875.

Schnerr GH and SauerJ. Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on multiphase flow, New Orleans, LA, 27 May–1 June 2001.

Singhal

Athavale

, et al. Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluid Eng-T ASME 2002; 124: 617–624.

Iben

. Modeling of cavitation. Syst Anal Model Simul 2002; 42: 1283–1307.

10.

Zwart PJ, Gerber AG and Belamri T. A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on multiphase flow, Yokohama, Japan, 30 May–3 June 2004.

11.

Senocak

Shyy

. A pressure-based method for turbulent cavitating flow computations. J Comput Phys 2002; 176: 363–383.

12.

Iannetti

Stickland

Dempster

. A CFD and experimental study on cavitation in positive displacement pumps: benefits and drawbacks of the ‘full’ cavitation model. J Eng Appl Comp Fluid 2016; 10: 57–71.

13.

Iannetti

. A CFD study on the mechanisms which cause cavitation in positive displacement reciprocating pumps. J Hydrodyn 2015; 1: 47–59.

14.

Yin

Nie

Xiao

, et al. Numerical and experimental study of cavitation performance in sea water hydraulic axial piston pump. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2016; 230: 716–735.

15.

Kunkis M and Weber J. Experimental and numerical assessment of an axial piston pump’s speed limit. In: Proceedings of the BATH/ASME 2016 symposium on fluid power and motion control, Bath, UK, 7–9 September 2016, pp.1–9. New York, NY: ASME.

16.

Edge

Darling

. The pumping dynamics of swash plate piston pumps. J Dyn Syst-T ASME 1989; 111: 307–312.

17.

Harris

Edge

Tilley

. The suction dynamics of positive displacement axial piston pumps. J Dyn Syst-T ASME 1994; 116: 281–287.

18.

Berta GL, Casoli P and Vacca A. Simulation model of an axial piston pump in-clusive of cavitation. In: Proceedings of fluid power systems and technology division and 2002 ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, New Orleans, LA, 17–22 November 2002, pp.1–9. New York, NY: ASME.

19.

Casoli

Vacca

Franzoni

, et al. Modelling of fluid properties in hydraulic positive displacement machines. Simul Model Pract Th 2006; 14: 1059–1072.

20.

Vacca

Klop

Ivantysynova

. A numerical approach for the evaluation of the effects of air release and vapour cavitation on effective flow rate of axial piston machines. Int J Fluid Power 2010; 11: 33–45.

21.

Shah

Vacca

Dabiri

. Air release and cavitation modeling with a lumped parameter approach based on the Rayleigh–Plesset equation: the case of an external gear pump. Energies 2018, pp. 11(12): 3472–11(12): 3472.

22.

LMS Imagine SA. Hydraulic library, User Manual, Rev16; 2017.

23.

Zhou

Vacca

Manhartsgruber

. A novel approach for the prediction of dynamic features of air release and absorption in hydraulic oils. J Fluid Eng-T ASME 2013; 135: 091305–091305.

24.

Zhou

Vacca

Casoli

. A novel approach for predicting the operation of external gear pumps under cavitating conditions. Simul Model Pract Th 2014; 45: 35–49.

25.

Zhou

Wei

. A novel approach for predicting thermal effects of gas cavitation in hydraulic circuits. Energy 2015; 83: 576–582.

26.

Wang

Dong

. A novel approach for predicting inlet pressure of aircraft hydraulic pumps under transient conditions. Chin J Aeronaut 2019; 32: 2566–2576.

27.

Yuan

Zhou

Luo

, et al. Dynamic evolution and effects of gas phase in cavitation of axial piston pump. Acta Armamentarii 2015; 36: 559–565. in Chinese).

28.

Wang Y, Guo SR, Dong HK. Modeling and control of a novel electro-hydrostatic actuator with adaptive pump displacement. Chin J Aeronaut 2020; 33(1): 365–371.

29.

SAE international. Civil type variable delivery, pressure compensated, hydraulic pump. Report No.: AS595D, October 2015. Warrendale, PA: Aerospace, A-6C4 Power Sources Committee.