Grid fins consisting of a lattice of high aspect ratio planar members encompassed by an outer frame are unconventional control surfaces used on numerous missiles and bombs due to their enhanced lifting characteristics at high angles of attack and across wider Mach number regimes. The current paper accomplishes and compares the effect of different grid fin patterns on subsonic flow aerodynamics of grid fins by virtue of the determination of their respective aerodynamic forces. Furthermore, this study deliberates the impact of gap variation on aerodynamics of different patterns. Results enunciate enhanced aerodynamic efficiency, and lift slope for web-fin cells and single diamond patterns compared to the baseline model. Moreover, the study indicates improved aerodynamic performance for diamond patterns with higher gaps by providing elevated maximum lift coefficient, delayed stall angle, and comparable drag at lower angles. The study established the presence of an additional effect termed as the inclination effect alongside the cascade effect leading to deviations with respect to lift, stall, and aerodynamic efficiency amongst different gap variants of the individual patterns. Thus, optimization based on the aerodynamic efficiency, stall angle requirements, and construction cost by optimum pattern and gap selection can be carried out through this analysis, which can lead to elevated aerodynamic performance for grid fins.
Zaloga S. The scud and other Russian ballistic missile vehicles. No. 7037 in Armor at War Series. New Territories, Hong Kong: Concord Publications Co., 2000.
2.
Belotserkovsky SM, Odnovol LA, Safin YZ, et al. Keshetechatye Krylaya (Lattice wings). Mashinostronie, Moscow (Russian), 1987, pp.10–96 (see also: Belotzerkovsky SM, et al. Wings with internal framework. Machine Translation, FTID(RS)T-1289-89, Foreign Technology Div., 1987).
3.
Fulghum DA. It is the big one (MOAB actually fits in a B-2). Aviation Week & Space Technology, 16 March 2003, pp.32–33.
Savelsberg R and Kiessling J. North Korea’s Musudan missile: a performance assessment, http://38north.org/2016/12/musudan122016 (2016, accessed 21 October 2017).
Washington WD and Miller MS. Experimental investigations of grid fin aerodynamics: a synopsis of nine wind tunnel and three flight tests. In: Proceedings of the NATO RTO-MP-5, missile aerodynamics, Sorento, Italy, paper no. 10, 11-14 May 1998, pp.10–1 to 10–14. . France: NATO research and technology organization.
8.
Munawar S. Analysis of grid fins as efficient control surface in comparison to conventional planar fins. In: 27th International congress of the aeronautical sciences, Nice, France, vol. 3, 19–24 September 2010, pp.1732–1737. Sweden: ICAS.
9.
Ledlow II TW, Burkhalter JE and Hartfield RJ. Integration of grid fins for the optimal design of missile systems. In: AIAA aerodynamic flight mechanics conference, Sci-Tech, Kissimmee, FL, USA, paper no. AIAA 2015–1017, 5–9 January 2015. Reston, VA: AIAA.
10.
Washington WD, Booth P and Miller M. Curvature and leading edge sweep back effects on grid fin aerodynamic characteristics. In: 11th applied aerodynamics conference, Monterey, CA, USA, paper no. AIAA-93-3480-CP, 9–11 August 1993, pp.659–667. Reston, VA: AIAA.
11.
BrooksRABurkhalterJE. Experimental and analytical analysis of grid fin configurations. J Aircraft1989; 26: 885–887.
12.
BurkhalterJEFrankHM. Grid fin aerodynamics for missile applications in subsonic flow. J Spacecraft Rockets1996; 33: 38–44.
13.
TheerthamalaiP. Aerodynamic characterization of grid fins at subsonic speeds. J Aircraft2007; 44: 694–698.
14.
Theerthamalai P and Balakrishnan N. Effect of geometric parameters on the aerodynamic characteristics of grid-fin cells at supersonic speeds. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, paper no. AIAA 2007–690, 8––11 January 2007. Reston, VA: AIAA.
15.
BurkhalterJEHartfoeldRJLeleuxTM. Nonlinear aerodynamic analysis of grid fin configurations. J Aircraft1995; 32: 547–554.
16.
ReynierPLongoJSchuleinE. Simulation of missiles with grid fins using an actuator disk. J Spacecraft Rockets2006; 43: 84–91.
17.
Washington WD and Miller M. Grid fins - a new concept for missile stability and control. In: 31st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, paper no. AIAA 93-0035, 11–14 January, 1993. Reston, VA: AIAA.
18.
Simpson GM and Sadler AJ. Lattice controls: a comparison with conventional, planar fins. In: Proceedings of the NATO RTO-MP-5, missile aerodynamics, Sorrento, Italy, paper no. 9, 11–14 May 1998, pp.9–1 to 9–10. France: NATO Research and Technology Organization.
19.
Dupuis A and Berner C. Aerodynamic aspects of a grid finned projectile at subsonic and supersonic velocities. In: 19th International symposium on ballistics, Interlaken, Switzerland, paper no. EB11, 7–11 May 2001, pp.495–502. Thun, Switzerland: RUAG Land Systems.
20.
Berner C and Dupuis A. Wind tunnel tests of a grid finned projectile configuration. In: 39th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, paper no. AIAA 2001-105, 8–11 January 2001. Reston, VA: AIAA.
21.
Miller MS and Washington WD. An experimental investigation of grid fin drag reduction techniques. In: 12th applied aerodynamics conference, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, paper no. AIAA-94-1914-CP, 20–23 June 1994, pp.800–808. Reston, VA: AIAA.
22.
Fumiya Hiroshima KT. Grid pattern effects on aerodynamic characteristics of grid fins. In: 24th international congress of the aeronautical sciences (ICAS), Yokohama, Japan, paper no. ICAS 2004-2.11.R, 29 August to 3 September 2004, pp.1–8. Sweden: ICAS.
23.
Sun Y and Khalid M. A CFD investigation of grid fin missiles. In: 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Cleveland, OH, USA, paper no. AIAA-98-3571, 13–15 July 1998. Reston, VA: AIAA.
24.
DeSpirito J and Sahu J. Viscous CFD calculations of grid fin missile aerodynamics in the supersonic flow regime, April 2001, Document No. ARL-RP-19. DTIC Document for Army Research Lab. Aberdeen Proving Ground, USA: ARL.
25.
DeSpirito J, Vaughn M and Washington WD. CFD investigation of canard-controlled missile with planar and grid fins in supersonic flow. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit, Monterey, CA, USA, paper no. AIAA 2002-4509, 5–8 August 2002. Aberdeen Proving Ground, USA: ARL.
26.
LiuYXiaZxLiuJ. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic characteristics and heating for grid fin missiles. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2018, pp. 233–233.
27.
Debiasi M. Measurements of the forces and moments generated by swept-back grid fins. In: 30th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, New Orleans, LO, USA, paper no. AIAA 2012-2909, 25–28 June 2012, pp.1079–1089. Reston, VA: AIAA.
28.
Debiasi M, Yan Z and Chng TL. Swept-back grid fins for transonic drag reduction. In: 28th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Chicago, IL, USA, paper no. AIAA 2010-4244, 28 June to 1 July 2010, pp.424–440. Reston, VA: AIAA.
29.
ZengY. Drag reduction for sweptback grid fin with blunt and sharp leading edges. J Aircraft2012; 49: 1526–1531.
30.
Dan W and Yong Y. Numerical study on drag reduction for swept-back, swept-front, delta grid fin with blunt and sharp leading edges. In: AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, Sci-Tech, National Harbor, MD, USA, paper no. AIAA 2014-0638, 13–17 January 2014. Reston, VA: AIAA.
31.
DebiasiMZengY. Forces and moments generated by swept-back grid fins with sharp leading edges. J Aircraft2016; 53: 1964–1968.
32.
Schülein E and Guyot D. Novel high-performance grid fins for missile control at high speeds: preliminary numerical and experimental investigations. In: Innovative missile systems, meeting proceedings RTO-MP-AVT-135, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, paper no. 35, 15–19 May 2006, pp.35–1 to 35–28. France: RTO.
33.
Pruzan D, Mendenhall M, Rose W, et al. Grid fin stabilization of the Orion launch abort vehicle. In: 29th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, paper no. AIAA 2011-3018, 27–30 June 2011, pp.281–297. Reston, VA: AIAA.
34.
TripathiMMisraASucheendranMM. Effect of planar member cross-section on cascade fin aerodynamics. J Spacecraft Rockets2018.
35.
TripathiMSucheendranMMMisraA. Flow field characterization and visualization of grid fin subsonic flow. ASME J Fluids Eng2019; 141: 1–22.
36.
Tripathi M, Sucheendran MM and Misra A. High angle of attack analysis of cascade fin in subsonic flow. In: Singh S, Raj P and Tambe S (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on modern research in aerospace engineering, Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018, pp.121–131.
37.
CSIR - National Aerospace Laboratories. Micro air vehicle Aerodynamics Research Tunnel (MART) Facility, www.nal.res.in/en/facilities/mart (2018, accessed 15 November 2018).
