Motion planning of spacecraft with obstacle avoidance under low uncertainty using the improved equal-collision-probability-curve and improved linear quadratic regulator strategy
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2019
Motion planning of spacecraft with obstacle avoidance under low uncertainty using the improved equal-collision-probability-curve and improved linear quadratic regulator strategy
In terms of the motion planning problem of spacecraft proximity operations with obstacle avoidance under low uncertainty, the improved equal-collision-probability-curve and improved linear quadratic regulator (IECPC-ILQR) strategy is proposed. Firstly, the novel function of the IECPC algorithm is developed to generate the avoidance control impulse. Subsequently, the ILQR is designed to track the reference trajectory. Furthermore, combining the improved ECPC algorithm with the ILQR controller, the composite controller of the IECPC-ILQR strategy is obtained and is implemented on the chaser spacecraft. Compared with the traditional ECPC algorithm, the IECPC-ILQR strategy can avoid collision in the presence of low uncertainty. Furthermore, the proposed avoidance strategy can obtain higher control precision while requiring the same fuel. Finally, numerical simulations verify the effectiveness of the proposed IECPC-ILQR strategy.
ZhangJRZhaoSGZhangY, et al.Autonomous guidance for rendezvous phasing based on special-point-based maneuvers. J Guid Control Dyn2015; 38: 578–586.
2.
YuJYuYGHaoD, et al.Biobjective mission planning for geosynchronous satellites on-orbit refueling. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2017; 233: 686–697.
3.
BakhtiariMDaneshjouKMonhammadi-DehabadiAA. The effects of parking orbit elements on designing of on-orbit servicing missions. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2017; 233: 793–810.
4.
YuJChenXQChenLH. Optimal planning of LEO active debris removal based on hybrid optimal control theory. Adv Space Res2015; 55: 2628–2640.
5.
ZhangJRZhaoSGYangYZ. Characteristics analysis for elliptical orbit hovering based on relative dynamics. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2013; 49: 2742–2750.
6.
SunL. Passivity-based adaptive finite-time trajectory tracking control for spacecraft proximity operations. J Spacecr Rockets2016; 53: 46–56.
7.
SunLHuoWJiaoZX, et al.Disturbance-observer-based robust relative pose control for spacecraft rendezvous and proximity operations under input saturation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2018; 54: 1605–1617.
8.
SunLHuoWJiaoZX. Robust nonlinear adaptive relative pose control for cooperative spacecraft during rendezvous and proximity operations. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2017; 25: 1840–1847.
9.
SteveUAlvarSIlzhakB. Passivity-based adaptive control of robotics spacecraft for proximity operations under uncertainties. J Guid Control Dyn2016; 39: 1444–1453.
10.
SunLHuoW. Adaptive fuzzy control of spacecraft proximity operations using hierarchical fuzzy systems. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron2016; 21: 1629–1640.
11.
SeongJDKimHD. Multi-objective optimization for collision avoidance maneuver using a genetic algorithm. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2016; 230: 1438–1447.
12.
SeongJDKimHD. Optimization of collision avoidance maneuver planning for cluster satellites in space debris explosion situation. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2018; 232: 407–422.
13.
LuoYZSunZJ. Safe rendezvous scenario design for geostationary satellites with collocation constraints. Astrodynamics2017; 1: 71–93.
14.
ChuXYZhangJRLuS, et al.Optimised collision avoidance for an ultra-close rendezvous with a failed satellite based on the Gauss pseudospectral method. Acta Astronaut2016; 128: 363–376.
15.
ZhangJRChuXYZhangY, et al.Safe-trajectory optimization and tracking control in ultra-close proximity to a failed satellite. Acta Astronaut2018; 144: 339–352.
16.
ChuXYHuQZhangJR. Path planning and collision avoidance for a multi-arm space maneuverable robot. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2018; 54: 217–232.
17.
KhatibO. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Auton Robot Veh1986; 50: 396–404.
18.
McInnesCR. Autonomous proximity manoeuvring using artificial potential functions. ESA J1993; 17: 159–169.
19.
HuQLDongHYZhangYM, et al.Tracking control of spacecraft formation flying with collision avoidance. Aerosp Sci Technol2015; 42: 353–364.
20.
NiQHuangYYChenXQ. Nonlinear control of spacecraft formation flying with disturbance rejection and collision avoidance. Chin Phys B2017; 26: 014502.
21.
LiXHZhuZBSongSM. Non-cooperative autonomous rendezvous and docking using artificial potentials and sliding mode control. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2018; 233: 1171–1184.
22.
GeJXZhaoJFYuanJP. A novel guidance strategy for autonomously approaching a tumbling target. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2018; 232: 861–871.
23.
LiQZhangBYuanJP, et al.Potential function based robust safety control for spacecraft rendezvous and proximity operations under path constraint. Adv Space Res2018; 62: 2586–2598.
24.
CaoLQiaoDXuJW. Suboptimal artificial potential function sliding mode control for spacecraft rendezvous with obstacle avoidance. Acta Astronaut2018; 143: 133–146.
25.
FehseW. Automated rendezvous and docking of spacecraft, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
26.
WangYBaiYZRanDC, et al.The equal-collision-probability-surface method for spacecraft collision avoidance. Adv Astronaut Sci2017; 161: 761–776.
27.
WangYBaiYZXingJJ, et al.Equal-collision-probability-curve method for safe spacecraft close-range proximity maneuvers. Adv Space Res2018; 62: 2599–2619.
28.
WangYChenXQRanDC, et al.Multi-equal-collision-probability-curve method for convex polygon shape spacecraft safe proximity manoeuvres. J Navig2019; 72: 405–429.
29.
WangYChenXQRanDC, et al.Dual-equal-collision-probability-curve method for spacecraft safe proximity maneuvers in presence of complex shape. Acta Astronaut2019; 159: 65–76.
30.
CaoLQiaoDChenXQ. Laplace ℓ1 Huber based cubature Kalman filter for attitude estimation of small satellite. Acta Astronaut2018; 148: 48–56.
31.
OuYWZhangHB. Mars final approach navigation using ground beacons and orbiters: an information propagation perspective. Acta Astronaut2017; 138: 490–500.
32.
YangZLuoYZZhangJ, et al.Uncertainty quantification for short rendezvous missions using a nonlinear covariance propagation method. J Guid Control Dyn2016; 39: 2170–2178.
33.
LuoYZLiangLBWangH, et al.Quantitative performance for spacecraft rendezvous trajectory safety. J Guid Control Dyn2011; 34: 1264–1269.
34.
GeSSCuiYJ. Dynamic motion planning for mobile robots using potential field method. Auton Robots2002; 13: 207–222.
35.
LinF. Robust control design an optimal control approach, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2007.
36.
XingJJYuYWangY, et al.Robust control of low earth satellites formation based on improved linear quadratic regular. J Nation Univ Defen Technol2016; 38: 100–106. (in Chinese).
37.
XingJJTangGJXiXN, et al.Satellite formation design and optimal stationkeeping considering nonlinearity and eccentricity. J Guid Control Dyn2007; 30: 1523–1528.
38.
OuYWZhangHB. Observability-based mars autonomous navigation using formation flying spacecraft. J Navig2018; 71: 21–43.
39.
PeynotTLuiSTMcAllisterR, et al.Learned stochastic mobility prediction for planning with control uncertainty on unstructured terrain. J Field Robot2014; 31: 969–995.
40.
PsiakiML. Absolute orbit and gravity determination using relative position measurements between two satellites. J Guid Control Dyn2011; 34: 1285–1297.
41.
ChenQYinCZhouJ, et al.Hybrid consensus-based cubature Kalman filtering for distributed state estimation in sensor networks. IEEE Sens J2018; 18: 4561–4569.
