An arrival route model based on the point merge system is proposed for Ankara Esenboga International Airport. Real traffic handled by vectoring and a simulation analysis of the proposed point merge system model are compared in terms of the number of instructions and frequency occupancy time. The total average number of instructions is around 49% fewer and the frequency occupancy is about 37.4% less for the point merge system as opposed to vectoring. Moreover, feedback received from air traffic controllers is consistent with the obtained results in favor of the point merge system.
Shresta S and Mayer RH, Benefits and constraints of time-based metering along RNAV STAR routes. In: The 28rd IEEE/AIAA digital avionics systems conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 23–29 October 2009.
2.
SahinOUsanmazO. A new standard instrument arrival: the point merge system. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol2013; 85: 136–143.
3.
Favennec B, Vergne F and Zeghal K. Point merge integration of arrival flows enabling extensive RNAV application and CDA – operational services and environment definition. Eurocontrol Experimental Center, Version 2.0, 2010.
ChidaHZunigaCDelahayeD. Topology design for integrating and sequencing flows in terminal maneuvering area. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2012; 230: 1705–1720.
6.
Barker DR, Haltli BM, Laqui C, et al. Assessment of terminal RNAV mixed equipage. In: The 23rd IEEE digital avionics systems conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 28 October 2004.
7.
Wilson I and Hafner F. Benefit assessment of using continuous descent approaches at Atlanta. In: 24th digital avionics systems conference, Daytona Beach, FL, USA, 2005.
8.
Boursier L, Favennec B, Hoffman E, et al. Merging arrival flows without heading instructions. In: The 7th USA/Europe air traffic management R&D seminar, Barcelona, 2–5 July 2007.
9.
Ivanescu D, Shaw C, Tamvaclis C, et al. Models of air traffic merging techniques: evaluating performance of point merge. In: The 9th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations conference (ATIO), Hilton Head, SC, USA, September 2009.
10.
Favennec B, Hoffman E, Trzmiel A, et al. The point merge arrival flow integration technique: towards more complex environments and advanced continuous descent. In: The 9th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations conference (ATIO), Hilton Head, SC, USA, 21–23 September 2009.
11.
Wubben FJM and Busink JJ. Environmental benefits of continuous descent approaches at Schiphol Airport compared with conventional approach procedures. Report No. NLR-TP-2000-275, 2000.
12.
ClarkeJPNhutTHRenL, et al.Continuous descent approach: design and flight test for Louisville international airport. J Aircraft2004; 41: 1054–1066.
13.
ClarkeJPRenLMcclainE, et al.Evaluating concepts for operations in metroplex terminal area airspace. J Aircraft2012; 49: 758–773.
14.
Van Boven M. Development of noise abatement approach procedures. In: 10th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Manchester, UK, 10–12 May 2004.
15.
HartjesSVisserHGHeblySJ. Optimisation of RNAV noise and emission abatement standard instrument departures. Aeronaut J2010; 114: 757–767.
16.
Itoh E and Uejima K. Applying flight-deck interval management based continuous descent operation for arrival air traffic to Tokyo international airport. In: Tenth USA/Europe air traffic management research and development seminar, Chicago, USA, 10–13 June 2013.
17.
TurgutETUsanmazOCanarslanlarAO, et al.Energy and emission assessments of continuous descent approach. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol2010; 82: 32–38.
18.
Eurocontrol. Single European Sky ATM Research Programme: SESAR Release1, 2012.
19.
Liang M, Delahaye D and Marechal P. Potential operational benefits of multi-layer point merge system on dense TMA operation hybrid arrival trajectory optimization applied to Beijing capital international airport. In: 7th international conference on research in air transportation, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 20–24 June 2016.
20.
LiangMDelahayeDMarechalP. Integrated sequencing and merging aircraft to parallel runways with automated conflict resolution and advanced avionics capabilities. Transp Res Part C2017; 85: 268–291.
21.
Liang M, Delahaye D, Sbihi M, et al. Multi-layer point merge system for dynamically controlling arrivals on parallel runways. In: 35th digital avionics systems conference, Sacramento, CA, USA, September 2016.
22.
Turkish Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP), 2016.
