The evolution of a controlled broadband wave packet in flat-plate and swept-wing supersonic boundary layers was experimentally investigated at Mach number M = 2. The wave packet was introduced into the boundary layer by a localized pulse electrical discharge. The structure and evolution downstream of the wave packet were studied by hot-wire measurements. It was found that the wave packet has a symmetric shape in a flat-plate boundary layer, whereas there is asymmetry in case of a swept-wing one. The spectral analysis of the development of different modes of the wave packet was provided.
SchubauerGBSkramstadHK. Laminar boundary-layer oscillations and transition on a flat plate. J Res Nat Bur Stand1947; 38: 251–292.
2.
ChernorayVGBakchinovAAKozlovVV, et al.Experimental study of the K-regime of breakdown in straight and swept wing boundary layers. Phys Fluids2001; 13: 2129–2132.
3.
ChernorayVGDovgalAVKozlovVV, et al.Experiments on secondary instability of streamwise vortices in a swept-wing boundary layer. J Fluid Mech2005; 534: 295–325.
4.
Kendall JM. Supersonic boundary layer stability experiments. In: Proceedings of boundary layer transition study group meeting, San. Bernardino, CA, USA, 1967, 10-1–10-8.
5.
KosinovADMaslovAAShevelkovSG. Experiments on the stability of supersonic laminar boundary layers. J Fluid Mech1990; 219: 621–633.
6.
KosinovADSemionovNVShevelkovSGet alExperiments on the nonlinear instability of supersonic boundary layers. In: LinSPPhillipsWRCValentinDT (eds). Nonlinear instability of nonparallel flows, Berlin: Springer, 1994, pp. 196–206.
7.
TuminA. Nonlinear interaction of wave trains in a supersonic boundary layer. Phys Fluids1996; 8: 2552–2554.
8.
MaslovAAShipylukANBountinDA, et al.Mach 6 boundary-layer stability experiments on sharp and blunt cones. J Spacecraft Rockets2006; 43: 71–76.
9.
BountinDShiplyukAMaslovA. Evolution of nonlinear processes in a hypersonic boundary layer on a sharp cone. J Fluid Mech2008; 611: 427–442.
10.
KosinovADSemienovNVErmolaev YuG, et al.Experimental study of evolution of disturbances in a supersonic boundary layer on a swept-wing model under controlled conditions. J Appl Mech Technol Phys2000; 41: 44–49.
11.
Ermolaev YuGKolosovGLKosinovAD, et al.Linear evolution of controlled disturbances in the supersonic boundary layer on a swept wing. Fluid Dyn2014; 49: 188–197.
12.
KosinovADKolosovGLSemionovNV, et al.Linear development of controlled disturbances in the supersonic boundary layer on a swept wing at Mach 2. Phys Fluids2016; 28: 064101–064101.
13.
Kolosov GL, Kosinov AD, Yermolaev YG, et al. On the nonlinear development of controlled disturbances in the supersonic boundary layer of a swept wing. In: XXV conference on high-energy processes in condensed matter (HEPCM 2017), Novosibirsk, Russia, 5–9 June 2017, paper no. 030069.
14.
Kolosov G, Panina A and Kosinov A. On the development of controlled stationary and travelling disturbances in the supersonic boundary layer of a swept wing. In: XIV All-Russian school-conference of young scientists with international participation ‘‘Actual Problems of Thermal Physics and Physical Hydrodynamics’’, Novosibirsk, Russia, 22–25 November 2016, paper no. 00024.
15.
GaponovSASmorodskiiBV. Linear stability of three-dimensional boundary layers. J Appl Mech Technol Phys2008; 49: 157–166.
16.
MayerCSWernzSFaselHF. Numerical investigation of the nonlinear transition regime in a Mach 2 boundary layer. J Fluid Mech2011; 668: 113–149.
17.
Novikov AV and Egorov I. Direct numerical simulations of transitional boundary layer over a flat plate in hypersonic free-stream. In: 46th AIAA fluid dynamics conference. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.
18.
KudryavtsevANKhotyanovskyDV. Direct numerical simulation of transition to turbulence in a supersonic boundary layer. Thermophys Aeromech2015; 22: 559–568.
19.
KhotyanovskyDVKudryavtsevAN. Numerical simulation of the evolution of unstable disturbances of various modes and initial stages of the laminar-turbulent transition in the boundary layer at the freestream Mach number L¼6. Thermophys Aeromech2016; 23: 809–818.
20.
GasterMand GrantI. An experimental investigation of the formation and development of a wave packet in a laminar boundary layer. Proc R Soc Lond A1975; 347: 253–269.
21.
GasterM. A theoretical model of a wave packet in the boundary layer on a flat plate. Proc R Soc Lond A1975; 347: 271–289.
22.
KatasonovMMParkSHSungHJ, et al.Instability of streaky structure in a Blasius boundary layer. Exp Fluids2005; 38: 363–371.
23.
ChernorayVGGrekGRKozlovVV, et al.Spatial hot-wire visualization of the -structure transformation into the turbulent spot on the smooth flat plate surface and riblet effect on this process. J Visual2010; 13: 151–158.
24.
MayerCSLaibleACFaselHF. Numerical investigation of wave packets in a Mach 3.5 cone boundary layer. AIAA J2011; 49: 67–86.
25.
SivasubramanianJFaselHF. Numerical investigation of the development of three-dimensional wavepackets in a sharp cone boundary layer at Mach 6. J Fluid Mech2014; 756: 600–649.
26.
NovikovAEgorovIFedorovA. Direct numerical simulation of wave packets in hypersonic compressioncorner flow. AIAA J2016; 54: 2034–2050.
27.
Ladoon D and Schneider S. Measurements of controlled wave packets at Mach 4 on a cone at angle of attack. In: 36th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, 1998. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
28.
Ladoon DW. Waves packets generated by a surface glow discharge on a Mach-4 five degree cone at zero and three degrees angle of attack. PhD Thesis, Purdue University, USA, 1998.
29.
CasperKMBereshSJSchneiderSP. Pressure fluctuations beneath instability wavepackets and turbulent spots in a hypersonic boundary layer. J Fluid Mech2014; 756: 1058–1091.
30.
Casper KM, Beresh SJ, Henfling J, et al. Fluidstructure interactions using controlled disturbances on a slender cone at Mach 8. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016.
31.
Casper KM. Fluid-structure interactions on a slender cone under quiet flow conditions at Mach 6. In: 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017.
32.
YatskikhAAYermolaevYGKosinovAD, et al.Hotwire visualization of the evolution of localized wave packets in a supersonic flat-plate boundary layer. J Visual2017; 20: 549–557.
33.
YatskikhAAErmolaevYGKosinovAD, et al.Evolution of wave packets in supersonic flat-plate boundary layer. Thermophys Aeromech2015; 22: 17–27.
34.
Yermolaev YG, Yatskikh AA, Kosinov AD, et al. Wave analysis of the evolution of a single wave packet in supersonic boundary layer. In: 18th international conference on the methods of aerophysical research (ICMAR2016), Perm, Russia, 27 June–3 July 2016, paper no. 030037.
35.
GrekGRKatasonovMMKozlovVV. Modelling of streaky structures and turbulent-spot generation process in wing boundary layer at high free-stream turbulence. Thermophys Aeromech2008; 15: 549–561.
