A comparison of different unsteady flow control techniques in a highly loaded compressor cascade

Abstract

A numerical research is applied to investigate the effect of controlling the flow separation in a certain highly loaded compressor cascade using different unsteady flow control techniques. Firstly, unsteady pulsed suction as a new novel unsteady flow control technique was proposed and compared to steady constant suction in the control of flow separation. A more exciting effect of controlling the flow separation and enhancing the aerodynamic performance for unsteady pulsed suction was obtained compared to steady constant suction with the same time-averaged suction flow rate. Simultaneously, with the view to further exploring the potential of unsteady flow control technique, unsteady pulsed suction, unsteady pulsed blowing, and unsteady synthetic jet (three unsteady flow control techniques) are analyzed comparatively in detail by the related unsteady aerodynamic parameters such as excitation location, frequency, and amplitude. The results show that unsteady pulsed suction shows greater advantage than unsteady pulsed blowing and unsteady synthetic jet in controlling the flow separation. Unsteady pulsed suction and unsteady synthetic jet have a wider range of excitation location obtaining positive effects than unsteady pulsed blowing. The ranges of excitation frequency and excitation amplitude for unsteady pulsed suction gaining favorable effects are both much wider than that of unsteady pulsed blowing and unsteady synthetic jet. The optimum frequencies of unsteady pulsed suction, unsteady pulsed blowing, and unsteady synthetic jet are found to be different, but these optimum frequencies are all an integer multiple of the natural frequency of vortex shedding. The total pressure loss coefficient is reduced by 16.98%, 16.55%, and 17.38%, respectively, when excitation location, frequency, and amplitude are all their own optimal values for unsteady pulsed suction, unsteady pulsed blowing, and unsteady synthetic jet. The optimum result of unsteady synthetic jet only slightly outperforms that of unsteady pulsed suction and unsteady pulsed blowing. But unfortunately, there is no advantage from the standpoint of overall efficiency for the optimum result of unsteady synthetic jet because the slight improvement has to require a greater power consumption than the unsteady pulsed suction and unsteady pulsed blowing methods.

Keywords

Unsteady flow control technique highly loaded compressor cascade flow separation unsteady aerodynamic parameters aerodynamic performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benini

Biollo

. Aerodynamics of swept and leaned transonic compressor-rotors. Appl Energy 2007; 84: 1012–1027.

Zheng

Liu

, et al. The effect of end wall boundary layer on matching and corresponding flow control technique for multistage axial compressor. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2015; 230: 2179–2194.

Gbadebo

Cumpsty

Hynes

. Control of three-dimensional separations in axial compressors by tailored boundary layer suction. ASME J Turbomach 2008; 130: 125–128.

Jabbal

Liddle

Potts

, et al. Development of design methodology for a synthetic jet actuator array for flow separation control applications. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2013; 227: 110–124.

Schatz M and Thiele F. Numerical study of high-lift flow with separation control by periodic excitation. In: 39th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Berlin, Germany, 8–11 January 2001, paper no. AIAA-2001-0296.

Seifert

Bachar

Koss

, et al. Oscillatory blowing: a tool to delay boundary-layer separation. AIAA J 1993; 31: 2052–2060.

De Giorgi MG, Traficante S, De Luca C, et al. Active ﬂow control techniques on a stator compressor cascade: a comparison between synthetic jet and plasma actuators. In: Proceeding of ASME TURBO EXPO, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11–15 June 2012, paper no. GT-2012-69535.

Evans

Hodson

. Controlling separation on a simulated compressor blade using vortex-generator jets. J Propul Power 2010; 26: 819–827.

Hecklau M, Zander V and Peltzer I. Experimental AFC approaches on a highly loaded compressor cascade. Active Flow Control II. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp.171–186.

10.

Hecklau

Wiederhold

Zander

. Active separation control with pulsed jets in a critically loaded compressor cascade. AIAA J 2011; 49: 1729–1739.

11.

Hecklau

van Rennings

Zander

, et al. Particle image velocimetry of active flow control on a compressor cascade. Exp Fluids 2011; 50: 799–811.

12.

Cerretelli

Kirtley

. Boundary layer separation control with fluidic oscillators. ASME J Turbomach 2009; 131: 041001–041001.

13.

Zheng

Zhou

Hou

, et al. Separation control using synthetic vortex generator jets in axial compressor cascade. Acta Mech Sin 2006; 22: 521–527.

14.

Zheng

Zhou

. Investigation on a type of flow control to weaken unsteady separated flows by unsteady excitation in axial flow compressors. ASME J Turbomach 2005; 127: 489–496.

15.

Kerrebrock JL, Reijnen DP, Ziminsky WS, et al. Aspirated compressors. In: International gas turbine & aeroengine congress & exposition conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2–5 June 1997, paper no. 97-GT-525, pp.1–12.

16.

Kerrebrock

Epstein

Merchant

, et al. Design and test of an aspirated counter-rotating fan. ASME J Turbomach 2008; 130: 021004–021004.

17.

Gümmer

Goller

Swoboda

. Numerical investigation of end wall boundary layer removal on highly loaded axial compressor blade rows. ASME J Turbomach 2008; 130: 125–128.

18.

Guo

Gao

, et al. Simplified compound suction schemes of an aspirated highly loaded compressor cascade. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2016; 230: 628–638.

19.

Chen

Zhou

Wang

, et al. Numerical investigation of boundary layer suction on certain highly loaded aspirated compressor at low speeds. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2018; 232: 30–41.

20.

Zhang LX, Du X, Liu X, et al. 3D unsteady simulation of a low speed low-reaction aspirated compressor. In: Proceeding of ASME TURBO EXPO, Seoul, South Korea, 14–16 June 2016, paper no. GT-2016-56888.

21.

Arakeri

Narashimha

. Effect of pulsed slot suction on a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 1982; 21: 306–307.

22.

Hassan A. A two-point active flow control strategy for improved airfoil stall/post-stall aerodynamics. In: 44th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 9–12 January 2006, paper no. AIAA-2006-99.

23.

Huang PG, Bardina J and Coakley T. Turbulence modeling validation testing and development. NASA Technical Memorandum, 1997, 110446.

24.

Bardina JE, Huang PG and Coakley T. Turbulence modeling validation. In: 28th fluid dynamics conference, Snowmass Village, USA, 29 June–02 July 1997, paper no. AIAA-1997-2121.

25.

De Giorgi

De Luca

Ficarella

, et al. Comparison between synthetic jets and continuous jets for active flow control: application on a NACA 0015 and a compressor stator cascade. Aerosp Sci Tech 2015; 43: 256–280.

26.

Qin Y, Wang RY, Song YP, et al. Active flow control on a highly loaded compressor stator cascade with synthetic jets. In: Proceeding of ASME TURBO EXPO, Seoul, South Korea, 14–16 June 2016, paper no. GT-2016-56830.

27.

Benini

Biollo

Ponza

. Efficiency enhancement in transonic compressor rotor blades using synthetic jets: a numerical investigation. Appl Energy 2011; 88: 953–962.

28.

Gmelin

Zander

Hecklau

, et al. Active flow control concepts on a highly loaded subsonic compressor cascade: résumé of experimental and numerical results. ASME J Turbomach 2012; 134: 061021–061021.

29.

Zheng

Zhang

Xing

, et al. Separation control of axial compressor cascade by fluidic-based excitations. ASME J Turbomach 2011; 133: 041016–041016.

30.

Bons

Sondergaard

Rivir

. Turbine separation control using pulsed vortex generator jets. ASME J Turbomach 2000; 123: 198–206.

31.

Mondal

Guha

Das

. Computational study of periodically unsteady interaction between a wall jet and an offset jet for various velocity ratios. Comput Fluids 2015; 123: 146–161.

32.

Hunt JCR, Wray AA and Moin P. Eddies stream and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Technical Report CTR-S88, Center for Turbulence Research, 1988.