Effects of periodic wakes on the endwall secondary flow in high-lift low-pressure turbine cascades at low Reynolds numbers

Abstract

Periodic wakes affect not only the surface boundary layer characteristics of low-pressure turbine blades and profile losses but also the vortex structures of the secondary flow and the corresponding losses. Thus, understanding the physical mechanisms of unsteady interactions and the potential to eliminate secondary losses is becoming increasingly important for improving the performance of high-lift low-pressure turbines. However, few studies have focused on the unsteady interaction mechanism between periodic wakes and endwall secondary flow in low-pressure turbines. This paper verified the accuracy of computational fluid dynamics by comparing experimental results and those of the numerical predictions by taking a high-lift low-pressure turbine cascade as the research object. Discussion was focused on the interaction mechanisms between the upstream wakes and secondary flow within the high-lift low-pressure turbine. The results indicated that upstream wakes have both positive and negative effects on the endwall flow, where the periodic wakes can decrease significantly the size of the separation bubble, prevent the formation of secondary vorticity structures at relatively high Reynolds numbers (100,000 and 150,000), and reduce the cross-passage pressure gradient of cascade. In addition, periodic wakes can improve the cascade incidence characteristic in terms of reducing the overturning and underturning of the secondary flow at downstream of the cascade all of which are beneficial for decreasing the endwall secondary losses, whereas more endwall boundary layer is involved in the main flow passage due to the wake transport, resulting in increased strength of the secondary flow at low Reynolds number of 25,000 and 50,000. Compared with the results without wakes, the total pressure loss for unsteady condition at the cascade exit decreases by 2.7% and 6.1% at high Reynolds number of 100,000 and 150,000, respectively. However, the secondary loss at unsteady flow conditions increases at low Reynolds number of 25,000 and 50,000.

Keywords

Periodic wake low Reynolds number high-lift low-pressure turbine secondary flow

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hodson

Howell

. The role of transition in high-lift low-pressure turbines for aeroengines. Prog Aerosp Sci 2005; 41: 419–454.

Sanders DD, Nessler CA, Sondergaard R, et al. A CFD and experimental investigation of unsteady wake effects on a highly loaded low pressure turbine blade at low Reynolds number. ASME Paper No. GT2010-22977, 2010.

Gregory-Smith

Cleak

. Secondary flow measurements in a turbine cascade with high inlet turbulence. J Turbomach 1992; 114: 173–183.

Wang

Olson

Goldstein

et al.

Flow visualization in a linear turbine cascade of high performance turbine blades. J Turbomach 1997; 119: 1–8.

Hodson

Howell

. Bladerow interactions, transition, and high-lift aerofoils in low-pressure turbines. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2005; 37: 71–98.

Bigoni F, Vagnoli S, Arts T, et al. Numerical study on the effects of the upstream wake generator on the aerodynamic performance of a high-lift low pressure turbine blade. ASME Paper No. GT2016-56647, 2016.

Schulte

Hodson

. Unsteady wake-induced boundary layer transition in high lift LP turbines. J Turbomach 1998; 120: 28–35.

Zhang

Hodson

. Combined effects of surface trips and unsteady wakes on the boundary layer development of an ultra-high-lift LP turbine blade. J Turbomach 2005; 127: 479–488.

Hodson

Dawes

. On the interpretation of measured profile losses in unsteady wake–Turbine blade interaction studies. J Turbomach 1998; 120: 276–284.

10.

Curtis

Hodson

Banieghbal

et al.

Development of blade profiles for low-pressure turbine applications. J Turbomach 1997; 119: 531–538.

11.

Volino

. Effect of unsteady wakes on boundary layer separation on a very high lift low pressure turbine airfoil. J Turbomach 2012; 134: 011011–011011.

12.

Langston

Nice

Hooper

. Three-dimensional flow within a turbine cascade passage. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1977; 99: 21–28.

13.

Moore

Adhye

. Secondary flows and losses downstream of a turbine cascade. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1985; 107: 961–968.

14.

Sieverding

. Recent progress in the understanding of basic aspects of secondary flows in turbine blade passages. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1985; 107: 248–257.

15.

Denton J and Pullan G. A numerical investigation into the sources of endwall loss in axial flow turbines. ASME Paper No. GT2012-69173, 2012.

16.

Zou

Liu

et al.

Upstream wake–secondary flow interactions in the endwall region of high-loaded turbines. Comput Fluids 2010; 39: 1575–1584.

17.

Ciorciari

Kirik

Niehuis

. Effects of unsteady wakes on the secondary flows in the linear T106 turbine cascade. J Turbomach 2014; 136: 091010–091010.

18.

Kirik I and Niehuis R. Experimental investigations on effects of unsteady wakes on the secondary flows in the linear T106 turbine cascade. ASME Paper No. GT2015-43170, 2015.

19.

Zhao

Zhu

et al.

Effects of low Reynolds number on flow stability of a transonic compressor. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2014; 229: 601–611.

20.

Volino RJ, Ibrahim MB and Galvin CD. Effects of periodic unsteadiness on secondary flows in high pressure turbine passages. ASME Paper No. GT2013-95881, 2013.

21.

Bons

Pluim

Gompertz

et al.

The application of flow control to an aft-loaded low pressure turbine cascade with unsteady wakes. J Turbomach 2012; 134: 031009–031009.

22.

Mahallati A. Aerodynamics of a low-pressure turbine airfoil under steady and periodically unsteady conditions. PhD Thesis, Carleton University, Canada, 2003.