This paper investigates a methodology for autopilot design for an unmanned air vehicle where one of the lateral control surfaces, i.e. the aileron or rudder, becomes jammed and unusable. The autopilot handles the automatic recovery, autonomous guidance and landing of the disabled unmanned aerial vehicle. An accurate nonlinear aircraft model is used to build local flight control laws using loop-shaping to decouple longitudinal and lateral channels. The design is carried out in a way to allow smooth scheduling over the local controllers without losing stability and performance, culminating in a robust emergency autopilot over the full flight envelope. The autopilot is tested on an example distress scenario involving aileron surface jam. It is confirmed through simulations that the autopilot design is capable of resuming safe flight and autonomous navigation under the fault scenario and is able to safely land the unmanned aerial vehicle to a target runway.
Burcham FWJ, Maine TA, Fullerton CG, et al. Development and flight evaluation of an emergency digital flight control system using only engine thrust on an F-15 airplane. NASA, 1996.
MailleNPChaudronL. Towards more integrated safety management tools for airlines. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2014; 228: 342–354.
7.
FekriSAthansMPascoalA. Issues, progress and new results in robust adaptive control. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process2006; 20: 519–579.
8.
ZhengFYGongHJZhenZY. Adaptive constraint backstepping fault-tolerant control for small carrier-based unmanned aerial vehicle with uncertain parameters. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2016; 230: 407–425.
9.
ShtesselYBuffingtonJBandaS. Tailless aircraft flight control using multiple time scale reconfigurable sliding modes. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2002; 10: 288–296.
10.
ZhangYJiangJ. Integrated active fault-tolerant control using IMM approach. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electr Syst2001; 37: 1221–1235.
11.
SeoJKimYKimSet al.Consensus-based reconfigurable controller design for unmanned aerial vehicle formation flight. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2012; 226: 817–829.
LunguMLunguR. Reconfigurable controller for active fault-tolerant control systems with applicability to flight control. Proc Romanian Acad Ser A2014; 15: 191–199.
14.
RanDChenXShengT. Adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control for rigid spacecraft attitude maneuver with finite-time convergence. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2016; 230: 779–792.
15.
WenzelKMasselliAZellA. Automatic take off, tracking and landing of a miniature UAV on a moving carrier vehicle. J Intell Robot Syst2011; 61: 221–238.
16.
LuoY. Lateral directional fractional order Pi-lambda control of a small fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles: Controller designs and flight tests. IET Control Theory Appl2011; 5: 2156–2167.
17.
Ertin OB, Korkmaz H, Kaynak U, et al. Hardware-in-the-loop test platform for a small fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle embedded controller. In: The 32nd IASTED international conference on modelling, identification and control (MIC 2013), Innsbruck, Austria, 2013.
18.
Kasnakoglu C and Kaynak U. Automatic recovery and autonomous navigation of disabled aircraft after control surface actuator jam. In: AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference, Toronto, Canada, 2010.
19.
Kaynak U, Akbaba R, Kibar A, et al. Design and manufacture of a fuel cell powered unmanned air vehicle. In: International unmanned vehicles workshop UVW2010, Istanbul, Turkey, 2010.
20.
Korkmaz H, Ertin OB, Kasnakoglu C, et al. Design of a flight stabilizer system for a small fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle using system identification. In: IFAC workshop on advances in control and automation theory for transportation applications (ACATTA 2013), Istanbul, Turkey, 2013.
21.
AkyürekŞKürkçüBKaynakÜet al.Control loss recovery autopilot design for fixed-wing aircraft. IFAC-Papers OnLine2016; 49: 117–123.
22.
AkyurekSKaynakUKasnakogluC. Altitude control for small fixed-wing aircraft using H∞ loop-shaping method. IFAC-Papers OnLine2016; 49: 111–116.
23.
KasnakoğluC. Investigation of multi-input multi-output robust control methods to handle parametric uncertainties in autopilot design. PloS One2016; 11: e0165017–e0165017.
24.
KasnakoğluC. Scheduled smooth MIMO robust control of aircraft verified through blade element SIL testing. Trans Inst Meas Control. 2016; 40: 528–541.
25.
AtlasEErdoğanMIErtinOBet al.Hardware-in-the-loop test platform design for UAV applications. Appl Mech Mater2015; VI: 681–681.
26.
Akyurek S, Kaynak U and Kasnakoglu C. Design of a flight stabilizer for fixed-wing aircrafts using H∞ loop shaping method. In: 9th international conference of electrical and electronics engineering (ELECO), Bursa, Turkey, 2015.
27.
US Navy. NATOPS for the RQ-2B/RQ-2A pioneer unmanned aerial vehicle, 2002.
28.
Bray RM. A wind tunnel study of the pioneer remotely piloted vehicle. Doctoral Dissertation, Naval Postgraduate School, USA, 1991.
29.
Rauw M. FDC 1.2 - A Simulink toolbox for flight dynamics and control analysis. Haarlem, The Netherlands, 2001.
30.
MarzatJPiet-LahanierHDamongeotFet al.Model-based fault diagnosis for aerospace systems: A survey. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2012; 226: 1329–1360.
31.
NocedalJWrightSJ. Numerical optimization, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2006.
32.
StevensBLewisF. Aircraft control and simulation, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2003.
33.
LeVSafonovM. Rational matrix GCD's and the design of squaring-down compensators–a state space theory. IEEE Trans Autom Control1992; 36: 384–392.
34.
ChiangRSafonovM. H-infinity synthesis using a bilinear pole-shifting transform. AIAA J Guid Control Dyn1992; 15: 1111–1115.
