Conceptual study of a dual-rocket-based-combined-cycle powered two-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle

Abstract

The liquid oxygen/methane staged cycle liquid-rocket engine is one of the most potential rocket engines in the future for its higher performance, higher fuel density and reusable capacity. Two working states of this liquid-rocket engine named as full-load state and half-load state are defined in this paper. Based on this liquid-rocket engine, a dual-rocket-based-combined-cycle propulsion system with liquid oxygen /air/methane as propellants is therefore proposed. The dual-rocket-based-combined-cycle system has then five working modes: the hybrid mode, pure ejector mode, ramjet mode, scramjet mode and pure rocket mode. In hybrid mode, the booster and ejector rockets driven by the full-load liquid-rocket engine work together with the purpose of reducing thrust demand on ejector rocket. In scramjet mode, the fuel-rich burned hot gas generated by the half-load liquid-rocket engine is used as fuel, which is helpful to reduce the technical difficulty of scramjet in hypersonic speed. The five working modes of dual-rocket-based-combined-cycle are highly integrated based on the full- or half-load state of the liquid oxygen/methane staged cycle liquid-rocket engine, and the unified single type fuel of liquid methane is adopted for the whole modes. Then a preliminary design of a horizontal takeoff two-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle is conducted based on the dual-rocket-based-combined-cycle propulsion system. Under an averaged baseline thrust and specific impulse, the launch trajectory to reach a low Earth orbit at 100 km is optimized via the pseudo-spectral method subject to maximizing the payload mass. It is shown that the two-stage-to-orbit vehicle based on the dual-rocket-based-combined-cycle can achieve the payload mass fraction of 0.0469 and 0.0576 for polar mission and equatorial mission, respectively. Conclusively, insights gained in this paper can be usefully applied to a more detailed design of the dual-rocket-based-combined-cycle powered two-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle.

Keywords

Rocket-based-combined-cycle dual-rocket-based-combined-cycle liquid oxygen/methane staged cycle liquid-rocket engine two-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle launch trajectory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hammond

. Space transportation: a systems approach to analysis and design. AIAA Education Series, Reston, VA: AIAA, 1999, pp. 275–327.

Flaherty

Andrews

Liston

. Operability benefits of airbreathing hypersonic propulsion for flexible access to space. J Spacecraft Rockets 2010; 47: 280–287.

Daines

Segal

. Combined rocket and airbreathing propulsion system for space-launch applications. J Propul Power 1998; 14: 605–612.

Sarigul-Klijn

. A comparative analysis of methods for air-launching vehicles from earth to sub-orbit or orbit. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2006; 220: 439–452.

Czysz P and Little M. RBCC-a propulsion system for the 21st Century. In: Proceedings of 5th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technology conference, Munich, Germany, 30 November–3 December 1993, paper no. AIAA 1993-5096.

Carl F and Ehrlich J. Early studies of RBCC applications and lessons learned for today. In: Proceedings of 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Las Vegas, NV, 24–28 July 2000, paper no. AIAA 2000-3105.

Cheng

Kang

et al.

Extreme fuel-rich combustion characteristics of RBCC embedded rocket engine with gas-liquid shear coaxial injectors in continuously varying mixture ratios. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2015; 299: 736–746.

Siebenhaar A and Bulman MJ. The Strutjet engine: the overlooked option for space launch. In: Proceedings of 31th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, San Diego, CA, 10–12 July 1995, paper no. AIAA 1995-3124.

Faulkner R. Integrated system test of an airbreathing rocket. In: Proceedings of 10th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technology conference, Kyoto, Japan, 24–27 April 2001, paper no. AIAA 2001-1812.

10.

Ketchum A, Emanuel M and Cramer J. Summary of Rocketdyne engine A5 rocket based combined cycle testing. Report no. NASA/TM-1999-0008510, NASA, 1999.

11.

Segal

. The scramjet engine: processes and characteristics, 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 2–2.

12.

Marshall LA, Bahm C and Corpening GP. Overview with results and lessons learned of the X-43A Mach 10 Flight. In: Proceedings of 13th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technology conference, Capua, Italy, 16–20 May 2005, paper no. AIAA 2005-3336.

13.

Hank JM, Murphy JS and Mutzman RC. The X-51A scramjet engine flight demonstration program. In: Proceedings of 15th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technology conference, Dayton, OH, 28 April–1 May 2008, paper no. AIAA 2008-2540.

14.

Jackson

Cruber

. Mach 6-8+ hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet flight experiment: the HIFiRE Flight 2 project. J Propul Power 2015; 31: 36–53.

15.

Olds J and Bellini P. Argus, a highly reusable SSTO rocket-based combined cycle launch vehicle with maglifter launch assist. In: Proceedings of 8th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technology conference, Norfolk, VA, 27–30 April 1998, paper no. AIAA 1998-1557.

16.

Koster J. Hyperion: an SSTO vision vehicle concept utilizing rocket-based combined cycle propulsion. In: Proceedings of 9th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technology conference, Norfolk, VA, 1–5 November 1999, paper no. AIAA 1999-4944.

17.

Olds J, Ledsinger L, Bradford J, et al. Stargazer: a tsto bantam-x vehicle concept utilizing rocket-based combined-cycle propulsion. In: Proceedings of 9th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technology conference, Norfolk, VA, 1–5 November 1999, paper no. AIAA 1999-4888.

18.

Blocker ED, Komar DR, Bradly MK, et al. NGLT systems assessment of the Boeing FASST TSTO airbreathing vehicle concept. In: Proceedings of 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Huntsville, TX, 20–23 July 2003, paper no. AIAA 2003-5267.

19.

Brock MA. Performance study of two-stage-to-orbit reusable launch vehicle propulsion alternatives. Master Thesis, Air University, USA, 2004.

20.

Caisso

Souchier

Rothmund

et al.

A liquid propulsion panorama. Acta Astronaut 2009; 65: 1723–1737.

21.

Accettura AG, Mascanzoni F and Ierardo N. Investigations and considerations about LOX/HC engines as key technologies for future. In: Proceedings of 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Indianapolis, IN, 7–10 July 2002, paper no. AIAA 2002-3846.

22.

Sutton

Biblarz

. Rocket propulsion elements, 5th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2001, pp. 243–246.

23.

Pempie P, Froehlich T and Vernin H. LOX/methane and LOX/kerosene high thrust engine trade-off. In: Proceedings of 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Salk Lake City, UT, 8–11 July 2001, paper no. AIAA 2001-3542.

24.

Brown C. Conceptual investigations for a methane-fueled expander rocket engine. In: Proceedings of 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 11–14 July 2004, paper no. AIAA 2004-4210.

25.

Lux

Haidn

. Flame stabilization in high-pressure liquid oxygen/methane rocket engine combustion. J Propul Power 2009; 25: 15–23.

26.

NASA. Chemical equilibrium with applications, https://cearun.grc.nasa.gov (1994).

27.

Ying

Liu

. Detailed influences of chemical effects of hydrogen as fuel additive on methane flame. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015; 40: 3777–3788.

28.

Niioka

. Ignition simulation of methane/hydrogen mixtures in a supersonic mixing layer. Combust Flame 1995; 102: 462–470.

29.

Niioka

. Ignition analysis of unpremixed reactants with chain mechanism in a supersonic mixing layer. AIAA J 1993; 31: 863–868.

30.

Tahsini

. Turbulence and additive effects on ignition delay in supersonic combustion. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2012; 227: 93–99.

31.

Etele

Sislian

Parent

. Effect of rocket exhaust configurations on ejector performance in RBCC engines. J Propul Power 2005; 21: 656–666.

32.

Cramer JM, Greene M, Pal S, et al. RBCC ejector mode operating characteristics for single and twin thruster configurations. In: Proceedings of 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Salk Lake City, UT, 8–11 July 2001, paper no. AIAA 2001-3464.

33.

Daines RL and Merkle CL. Computational analysis of mixing and jet pumping in rocket ejector engines. In: Proceedings of 31th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, San Diego, CA, 10–12 July 1995, paper no. AIAA 1995-2477.

34.

Olds J and Bradford J. SCCREAM: a conceptual RBCC engine design tool. In: Proceedings of 33th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Seattle, CA, 6–9 July 1997, paper no. AIAA 1997-2760.

35.

Bradford J and Olds J. Improvements and enhancements to SCCREAM, a conceptual RBCC engine analysis tool. In: Proceedings of 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Cleveland, USA, 13–15 July 1998, paper no. AIAA 1998-3775.

36.

Varvill

Bond

. The SKYLON spaceplane-progress to realization. J Br Interplanet Soc 2008; 61: 412–418.

37.

Wuilbercq R, Pescetelli A, Mogavero A, et al. Robust multi-disciplinary design and optimization of a reusable launch vehicle. In: Proceedings of 19th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technology conference, Atlanta, GA, 16–20 June 2014, paper no. AIAA 2014-2363.

38.

Benson

Huntington

Thorvaldsen

et al.

Direct trajectory optimization and costate estimation via an orthogonal collocation method. J Guid Control Dynam 2006; 29: 1435–1440.

39.

Garg

Patterson

Darby

et al.

Direct trajectory optimization and costate estimation of finite-horizon and infinite-horizon optimal control problems using a Radau pseudo-spectral method. Comput Optim Appl 2011; 49: 335–358.

40.

Qiu

Jia

Meng

et al.

Maximum range trajectory optimization for a boost-glide vehicle using adaptive mesh refinement pseudospectral methods. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2016; 231(7): 1171–1182.