In this work, a trajectory optimization formulation for hypersonic boost–glide class vehicles to achieve maximum range under various in-flight and terminal constraints is proposed. While most of the published literature has considered maximum dynamic pressure as a constraint, the requirement of a certain minimum dynamic pressure has been addressed in this formulation to ensure aerodynamic controllability throughout the flight envelope for various ranges. The minimum dynamic pressure constraint is imposed as an in-flight inequality constraint and is achieved through a penalty function approach by casting it as a differential equation. Simulations are carried out, and the results are analyzed and presented to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed formulation.
Sang-YoungP. Launch vehicle trajectories with a dynamic pressure constraint. J Guidance Control Dyn1998; 35(6): 765–773.
11.
Tu L and Yuan J-P. Reentry trajectory optimization using direct collocation method and nonlinear programming. In: Proceedings of the 57th international astronautical congress, Valencia, Spain, 2–6 October 2006, pp.1–8. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA.
12.
Zhang K and Chen W. Reentry vehicle constrained trajectory optimization. In: Proceedings of the AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, San Francisco, CA, 11–14 April 2011, pp.1–16. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA.
13.
Zhang M, Sun Y, Duan G, et al. Reentry trajectory optimization of hypersonic vehicle with minimum heat. In: Proceedings of the 8th world congress on intelligent control and automation, Jinan, China, 6–9 July 2010, pp.1764–1769. New York, USA: IEEE.
14.
Prasanna HM, Ghose D, Bhat MS, et al. Ascent phase trajectory optimization for a hypersonic vehicle using nonlinear programming. In: Proceedings of the international conference computational science and its applications, Singapore, 9–12 May 2005, pp.548–557. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
15.
LuP. Inverse dynamics approach to trajectory optimization for an aerospace plane. J Guidance Control Dyn1993; 16(4): 726–732.
16.
LuP. Use of approximate gradients in trajectory optimization. J Guidance Control Dyn1992; 15(5): 1299–1301.
QiuWJiaQMengXet al.Maximum range trajectory optimization for a boost–glide vehicle using adaptive mesh refinement pseudospectral methods. Proc IMechE, G: J Aerosp Eng2016.
20.
LiYCuiNRongS. Trajectory optimization for hypersonic boost–glide missile considering aeroheating. Aircraft Eng Aerospace Tech2009; 81(1): 3–13.
21.
ZhangLSunMChenZet al.Receding horizon trajectory optimization with terminal impact specifications. Math Probl Eng2014; 35: 765–773.
22.
Yokoyama N and Suzuki S. Trajectory optimization via modified genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, Austin, TX, 11–14 August 2003, pp.1–9. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA.
23.
YokoyamaNSuzukiS. Modified genetic algorithm for constrained trajectory optimization. J Guidance Control Dyn2005; 28(1): 139–144.
24.
BalesdentMBérendNDépincéPet al.A survey of multidisciplinary design optimization methods in launch vehicle design. Struct Multidisciplin Optim2012; 45(5): 619–642.
25.
Kee PE, Dong L, and Siong CJ. Near optimal midcourse guidance law for flight vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 36th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, 1998, pp.1–11. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA.
LiZYangTFengZ. The multiobjective trajectory optimization for hypersonic glide vehicle based on normal boundary intersection method. Mathematical Prob Eng2016; 2016: 1–8.
28.
MacdonaldMBadescuV. The international handbook of space technology, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2014.
29.
KirkDE. Optimal control theory — An introduction, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
