A cruciform-finned slender body can excite a limit-cycle rolling oscillation at high angles of attack. To suppress the unwanted motions, flow control approaches should be employed if the aerodynamic control surfaces lose control efficiency at high angles of attack. As a promising technology, the ns-dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator has been successfully used in high-speed and high-Reynolds-number flow control applications. The present work employs a π-type ns-dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator and vortex generators to suppress self-excited rolling oscillation at α = 50°. The free-to-roll tests show that the plasma actuator ignited at F+ ∼ 1.5 and that the vortex generators can suppress rolling oscillation. The flow patterns from particle image velocimetry measurement at different cross-sections and rolling angles suggest that the vorticity decrease of the leeward vortices may be the control mechanism for the plasma actuator. For the vortex generators, evident modification of the flow field structure can be observed due to the vortices generated from the vortex generators, which decreases the rolling moment induced by the asymmetry vortices to suppress the self-excited rolling oscillation.
BenardNMoreauE. Electrical and mechanical characteristics of surface AC dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators applied to airflow control. Exp Fluid2014; 55: 1846–1846.
14.
RothJRShermanDMWilkinsonSP. Electrohydrodynamic flow control with a glow-discharge surface plasma. AIAA J2000; 38: 1166–1172.
15.
RothJR. Aerodynamic flow acceleration using paraelectric and peristaltic electrohydrodynamic effects of a one atmosphere uniform glow discharge plasma. Phys Plasma2003; 10: 2117–2126.
16.
PostMLCorkeTC. Separation control on high angle of attack airfoil using plasma actuators. AIAA J2004; 42: 2177–2184.
17.
JoliboisJForteMMoreauÉ. Application of an AC barrier discharge actuator to control airflow separation above a NACA 0015 airfoil: optimization of the actuation location along the chord. J Electrostat2008; 66: 496–503.
18.
KelleyCLBowlesPOCooneyJet al.Leading-edge separation control using alternating-current and nanosecond-pulse plasma actuators. AIAA J2014; 52: 1871–1884.
19.
LiYWuYZhouMet al.Control of the corner separation in a compressor cascade by steady and unsteady plasma aerodynamic actuation. Exp Fluid2010; 48: 1015–1023.
GrundmannSTropeaC. Active cancellation of artificially introduced Tollmien–Schlichting waves using plasma actuators. Exp Fluid2008; 44: 795–806.
22.
ChoiKSJukesTWhalleyR. Turbulent boundary-layer control with plasma actuators. Phil Trans Roy Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci2011; 369: 1443–1458.
23.
ZhangPFWangJJFengLHet al.Experimental study of plasma flow control on highly swept delta wing. AIAA J2010; 48: 249–252.
24.
SidorenkoAABudovskiyADMaslovAAet al.Plasma control of vortex flow on a delta wing at high angles of attack. Exp Fluid2013; 54: 1585–1585.
25.
PatelMPNgTTVasudevanSet al.Plasma actuators for hingeless aerodynamic control of an unmanned air vehicle. J Aircraft2007; 44: 1264–1274.
26.
Nelson RC, Corke TC, He C, et al. Modification of the flow structure over a UAV wing for roll control. In: 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Reno, Nevada, 9–11 January 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-884.
27.
BoeschGVoHDSavardBet al.Flight control using wing-tip plasma actuation. J Aircraft2010; 47: 1836–1846.
28.
ForteMJoliboisJPonsJet al.Optimization of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator by stationary and non-stationary measurements of the induced flow velocity: application to airflow control. Exp Fluid2007; 43: 917–928.
29.
DebienABenardNMoreauE. Streamer inhibition for improving force and electric wind produced by DBD actuators. J Phys D Appl Phys2012; 45: 215201–215201.
30.
Kelley CL, Bowles P, Cooney J, et al. High mach number leading-edge flow separation control using AC DBD plasma actuators. In: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Nashville, Tennessee, 9–12 January 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-906.
31.
RoupassovDVNikipelovAANudnovaMMet al.Flow separation control by plasma actuator with nanosecond pulsed-periodic discharge. AIAA J2009; 47: 168–185.
32.
NishiharaMTakashimaKRichJWet al.Mach 5 bow shock control by a nanosecond pulse surface dielectric barrier discharge. Phys Fluid2011; 23: 066101–066101.
33.
LittleJTakashimaKNishiharaMet al.Separation control with nanosecond-pulse-driven dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators. AIAA J2012; 50: 350–365.
34.
Roupassov DV, Zavyalov IN and Starikovskii AY. Boundary layer separation plasma control using low-temperature non-equilibrium plasma of gas discharge. In: 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Reno, Nevada, 9–12 january 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-373.
35.
BenardNZouzouNClaverieAet al.Optical visualization and electrical characterization of fast-rising pulsed dielectric barrier discharge for airflow control applications. J Appl Phys2012; 111: 033303–033303.
36.
DawsonRLittleJ. Characterization of nanosecond pulse driven dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators for aerodynamic flow control. J Appl Phys2013; 113: 103302–103302.
37.
UnferTBoeufJP. Modelling of a nanosecond surface discharge actuator. J Phys D Appl Phys2009; 42: 194017–194017.
38.
WangCRoyS. Energy and force prediction for a nanosecond pulsed dielectric barrier discharge actuator. J Appl Phys2012; 111: 103302–103302.
39.
BraunEMLuFKWilsonDR. Experimental research in aerodynamic control with electric and electromagnetic fields. Progr Aero Sci2009; 45: 30–49.
40.
GengXShiZChengKet al.Rolling stability analysis of missile with strake wing. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica2015; 25: 3241–3248. (in Chinese).
41.
NdongACAZouzouNBenardNet al.Geometrical optimization of a surface DBD powered by a nanosecond pulsed high voltage. J Electrostat2013; 71: 246–253.
