Numerical investigation on the weight,speed,and installation location effects on fuel tank separation trajectory

Abstract

A numerical survey coupled with six degree-of-freedom flight simulation have been undertaken to study the fuel tank separation trajectory, released from a trainer airplane. Two different spanwise release points for the tank, near and farther from the fuselage under the starboard wing with full and empty fuel were considered. The studies were performed at two free stream Mach numbers of 0.23 and 0.42 at zero angle of attack. Dynamic unstructured tetrahedral mesh approach combined with spring-based smoothing and local remeshing was applied with an implicit, second-order upwind accurate Euler solver. A six degree-of-freedom routine using a fourth-order multi-point time integration scheme was coupled with the flow solver to update the payload trajectory information at each time step. According to the results, the payload installed farther from the fuselage falls down with a higher forward velocity than that located closer, once released from the wing. The spanwise installation point was also found to have a strong impact on the pitch attitude of the released payload. The payload weight has been shown to play a vital role in longitudinal-lateral coupling behavior and the associated moments on the released payload.

Keywords

Fuel tank trajectory separation unsteady computational fluid dynamics orientation trainer aircraft

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lasek M and Sibilski K. Modelling of external store separation. In: 40^th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA, 2002.

Lasek M and Sibilski K. Validation of cluster bomb mathematical model. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit, and co-located conferences, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2005.

Tomaro

Witzeman

Strang

. Simulation of store separation for the F/A-18 C using Cobalt₆₀. J Aircraft 2000; 37: 361–367.

Charilon E and Davis M. Computational optimization of the F-35 external fuel tank for store separation. In: 46^th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 7–10 January 2008.

Bamber MJ. Two methods of obtaining aircraft trajectories from wind tunnel investigations. AERO Report 970 (AD 233198), David Taylor Model Basin, Washington DC, 1960.

Meyer R, Cenko A and Yaros S. An influence function method for predicting aerodynamic characteristics during weapon separation. In: 12th Navy symposium on aeroballistics, May 1981.

Arabshahi A and Whitfield DL. A multi-block approach to solving the three-dimensional unsteady Euler equations about a wing-pylon-store configuration. In: AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, paper 89-3401, August 1989.

Keen KS. New approaches to computational aircraft/store weapons integration. In: 28th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, NV, USA, paper 90-0274, January 1990. DOI: 10.2514/6.1990-274.

Lijewski

. Transonic Euler solutions on mutually interfering finned bodies. AIAA J 1990; 28: 982–988.

10.

Murman

Aftosmis

Berger

. Simulations of store separation from an F/A-18 with a Cartesian method. J Aircraft 2004; 41: 870–878.

11.

Yang HQ, Kannan R and Przekwas A. A nonlinear reduced order method with overset adaptive Cartesian /unstructured grid for moving body simulation. In: 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA 2012-0414, Reno, NV, USA, January 2012.

12.

Berglind T and Tysell L. Numerical investigation of the impact of maneuver on store separation trajectories. In: 28th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, AIAA 2010-4241, Chicago, IL, USA, 28 June to 1 July 2010.

13.

Osman AA, Aly AM, Khalili EE, et al. Numerical analysis of an external store separation from an airplane. In: AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, San Diego, California, USA, AIAA Sci Tech, AIAA 2016-2143, http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-2143.

14.

Sunay

Gulay

Akgul

. Numerical simulations of store separation trajectories using the EGLIN test. Scient Tech Rev 2013; 63: 10–16.

15.

Jafari

Toloei

Chasemlu

et al.

Simulation of store separation using low-cost CFD with dynamic mesh. IJE Trans 2014; 27: 775–784.

16.

Kamarand R and Alagn M. Cross wind effects on trajectory of released store. In: 17^th CFD symposium, Aeronautical Development Establishment, Bangalore, India, 11–12 August, 2015.

17.

Niranjanan CK, Malagi K, Ramesh V, et al. A store separation suit using distributed memory parallel mesh free CFD solver. In: 17^th annual CFD symposium, Bangalore, India, 11–12 August 2015.

18.

Ali M. Numerical study of life boat trajectory separated from maritime patrol aircraft and compare with wind tunnel result. MSc Thesis, Malek-Ashtar University of Technology, Iran, March 2014.

19.

Zhao

. Effect of elastic deformation on the trajectory of aerial separation. Aerosp Sci Technol 2015.

20.

Finley DB, Messina TL, Chankaya K, et al. Comparison of CFD-based simulation of external fuel tank separation with flight test. In: 52nd aerospace sciences meeting, National harbor, Maryland, AIAA Sci Tech, AIAA 2014-0211, 2014, http:\dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0211.

21.

Sodja

. Turbulence model in CFD, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, March, 2007.

22.

Manshadi

Jamalinasab

. Optimizing a two-element wing model with morphing flap by means of the response surface method. Iranian J Sci Technol 2016.

23.

Goldstein

. Classical mechanics, 3rd ed. Flushing,New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc, 1950.

24.

Pritchard

Fox

McDonald

. Introduction to fluid mechanics. 8th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2010.