Rapid generation of landing footprint based on geometry-predicted trajectory

Abstract

Landing footprint is critical to generate a feasible trajectory onboard for entry vehicles. In this paper, a new landing footprint calculation based on geometry-predicted trajectory is proposed. First, the lateral motion states, turning radius and angle, are analytically solved based on a planned drag acceleration vs. energy (D–E) profile. Through some simple coordinate and geometrical triangle transformation, all the trajectory states are extracted. Second, by calculating the maximum longitudinal range point, the furthest reachable boundary for planned D–E profile is obtained with proposed geometry-predicted trajectory. Finally, the landing footprint can be generated by repeatedly computing the reachable boundaries for all D–E profiles in the entry corridor. Simulation results with Common Aero Vehicle (CAV) model validate the accuracy of the geometry-predicted trajectory. Furthermore, detailed comparison of footprint generation results between the traditional and the proposed are presented at last.

Keywords

Entry vehicles landing footprint D–E profile geometry-predicted trajectory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hanson JM. Advanced guidance and control project for reusable launch vehicles. AIAA-2000-3957:10.

Ngo DA and Doman DB. Footprint calculation methods for a reusable launch vehicle. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, Anchorage, AK, 8–10 May 2002.

Xie

Liu

. Rapid generation of entry trajectories with waypoint and no-fly zone constraints. Acta Astronaut 2012; 77: 167–181.

Vinh

. Optimal trajectories in atmospheric flight, New York, NY: Elsevier, 1981.

Fahroo F and Doman DB. A direct method for approach and landing trajectory reshaping with failure effect estimation. AIAA-2004-4772, Providence, Rhode Island, 16–19 August 2004.

Benito

Mease

. Reachable and controllable sets for planetary entry and landing. J Guid Control Dynam 2010; 33: 641–654.

Li Y and Cui NG. Optimal attack trajectory for hypersonic boost-glide missile in the maximum reachable domain. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, Changchun, China, 9–12 August 2009, pp.4012–4017.

Garg

Patterson

. A unified framework for the numerical solution of optimal control problems using pseudospectral methods. Automatica 2010; 47: 829–837.

Han

Shan

Meng

. Re-entry trajectory optimization using an hp-adaptive radau pseudospectral method. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2012; 227: 1623–1636.

10.

Zhao

Zhou

. Particle swarm optimization applied to hypersonic reentry trajectories. Chinese J Aeronaut 2015; 28: 822–831.

11.

Leavitt

Mease

. Feasible trajectory generation for atmospheric entry guidance. J Guid Control Dynam 2007; 30: 473–481.

12.

Yang B, Wu CH, Li DW, et al. Footprint calculation for a reusable launch vehicle based on dynamics programming. In: 2009 Fifth international conference on natural computation, Tianjin, China, 14–16 August 2009.

13.

Xue

. Rapid generation of accurate entry landing footprints. J Guid Control Dynam 2010; 33: 756–767.

14.

Zhang

. Footprint problem with angle of attack optimization for high hifting reentry vehicle. Chinese J Aeronaut 2012; 25: 243–251.

15.

Huang

Nan

. A survey of numerical algorithms for trajectory optimization of flight vehicles. Sci China Tech Sci 2012; 55: 2538–2560.

16.

Shen

. Onboard generation of three-dimensional constrained entry trajectories. J Guid Control Dynam 2003; 26: 111–121.

17.

Zhu

Liu

Tang

. Highly constrained optimal gliding guidance. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2015; 229: 2321–2335.

18.

Jorris

Cobb

. Three-dimensional trajectory optimization satisfying waypoint and no-fly zone constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 2009; 32: 551–572.

19.

Mease

Kremer

. Shuttle entry guidance revisited using nonlinear geometric methods. J Guid Control Dynam 1994; 17: 1350–1356.

20.

Zhao

Zhou

Jin

. Progress in reentry trajectory planning for hypersonic vehicle. J Syst Eng Electron 2014; 25: 627–639.

21.

Saraf

Leavitt

Chen

. Design and evaluation of an acceleration guidance algorithm for entry. J Spacecraft Rocket 2004; 41: 986–996.

22.

Chen

. Entry guidance with real-time planning of reference based on analytical solutions. Adv Space Res 2015; 55: 2325–2345.

23.

. Asymptotic analysis of quasi-equilibrium glide in lifting entry flight. J Guid Control Dynam 2006; 29: 662–670.

24.

George R. The common aero vehicle: space delivery system of the future. In: AIAA space technology conference & exposition, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 28–30 September 1999. A99-42026.

25.

Jorris TR. Common aero vehicle autonomous reentry trajectory optimization satisfying waypoint and no-fly zone constraints. Air Force Institute of Technology, 2007. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.