A proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) technique has been successfully employed to develop reduced-order models for flow control purposes. For complex flows, higher POD modes also play a significant role in the stability and accuracy of the reduced-order model, thus require a closure, as in turbulent flows. In the presence of nonhomogeneous boundary conditions, developing a closure model becomes a challenging task. This paper discusses nonlinear closure modeling approaches for homogeneous and nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. Burgers’ equations, both one-dimensional and two-dimensional, are considered as the governing equations to develop reduced-order models with different boundary conditions. Homogeneous and nonhomogeneous boundary conditions are considered to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed closure modeling technique in boundary control applications. Numerical results show that the proposed closure model improves the accuracy of the reduced-order model.
AkhtarINayfehAH. Model based control of laminar wake using fluidic actuation. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn2010; 5(4): 041015–041015.
2.
BarbagalloASippDSchmidPJ. Closed-loop control of an open cavity flow using reduced-order models. J Fluid Mech2009; 641: 1–50.
3.
BergmannMCordierLBrancherJP. Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model. Phys Fluids2005; 17: 1321–1329.
4.
BurnsJAKingBB. A reduced basis approach to the design of low-order feedback controllers for nonlinear continuous systems. J Vib Control1998; 4: 297–323.
5.
GrahamWPeraireJTangK. Optimal control of vortex shedding using low-order models. Part I—open-loop model development. Int J Numer Methods Eng1999; 44(7): 945–972.
6.
ItoKRavindranSS. A reduced-order method for simulation and control of fluid flows. Int J Numer Methods Eng1998; 143(2): 403–425.
7.
ItoKSchroeterJD. Reduced order feedback synthesis for viscous incompressible flows. Math Comput Modell2001; 33(1): 173–192.
8.
RavindranSS. A reduced-order approach for optimal control of fluids using proper orthogonal decomposition. Int J Numer Methods Fluids2000; 34(5): 425–448.
9.
LeeHLeeSPiaoG. Reduced-order modeling of Burgers equations based on centroidal Voronoi tessellation. Int J Numer Anal Model2007; 4(3–4): 559–583.
10.
CaoYZhuJLuoZ. Reduced-order modeling of the upper tropical pacific ocean model using proper orthogonal decomposition. Int J Numer Methods Fluids2006; 52(8–9): 1373–1386.
11.
CaoYZhuJNavonIM. A reduced-order approach to four-dimensional variational data assimilation using proper orthogonal decomposition. Int J Numer Methods Fluids2007; 53(10): 1571–1583.
12.
FeenyBF. On the proper orthogonal modes and normal modes of continuous vibration systems. J Vib Acoust2001; 124(1): 157–160.
13.
BurkardtJGunzburgerMWebsterC. Reduced order modeling of some nonlinear stochastic partial differential equations. Int J Numer Anal Model2007; 4(3): 368–391.
14.
LawrieJHearneJW. Using modified proper orthogonal decomposition (MPOD) for reducing ecosystem models. ANZIAM J2007; 48(4): 461–473.
15.
AmsallemDFarhatC. Stabilization of projection-based reduced-order models. Int J Numer Methods Eng2012; 91(4): 1–22.
16.
DeaneAEMavriplisC. Low-dimensional description of the dynamics in separated flow past thick airfoils. AIAA J1994; 32(6): 1222–1234.
17.
MaXKaramanosGSKarniadakisGE. Dynamics and low-dimensionality of a turbulent near wake. J Fluid Mech2000; 410: 29–65.
18.
MaXKarniadakisGE. A low-dimensional model for simulating three dimensional cylinder flow. J Fluid Mech2002; 458: 181–190.
19.
NoackBRAfanasievKMorzynskiM. A hierarchy of low dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake. J Fluid Mech2003; 497: 335–363.
20.
Arian E, Fahl M and Sachs EW. Managing POD models by optimization methods. In: 41st IEEE conference on decision and control, Las Vegas, NV, 10–13 December 2002, vol. 3, pp.3300–3305. Piscataway: IEEE Press.
21.
Bui-ThanhTDamodaranMWillcoxK. Aerodynamic data reconstruction and inverse design using proper orthogonal decomposition. AIAA J2004; 42: 1505–1516.
22.
Carlberg K and Farhat C. A compact proper orthogonal decomposition basis for optimization-oriented reduced-order models. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 10–12 September 2008, pp.10–12. Reston, VA: AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).
23.
SanOIliescuT. Proper orthogonal decomposition closure models for fluid flows: Burgers equation. Int J Numer Anal Model Ser B2013; 1(1): 1–18.
24.
AkhtarIWangZBorggaardJ. A new closure strategy for proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order models. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn2012; 7: 034503–034503.
25.
WangZAkhtarIBorggaardJ. Two-level discretizations of nonlinear closure models for proper orthogonal decomposition. J Comput Phys2011; 230(1): 126–146.
26.
AubryNLianWYTitiES. Preserving symmetries in the proper orthogonal decomposition. SIAM J Sci Comput1993; 14(2): 483–505.
27.
HamlingtonPEDahmWJA. Reynolds stress closure for nonequilibrium effects in turbulent flows. Int J Numer Anal Model Ser B2008; 20: 115101–115101.
28.
Borggaard J, Duggleby A, Hay A, et al. Reduced-order modeling of turbulent flows. In: 18th international symposium on mathematical theory of networks and systems (MTNS ‘08), Blacksburg, USA, 28 July – 1 August 2008.
29.
WangZAkhtarIBorggaardJ. Proper orthogonal decomposition closure models for turbulent flows: A numerical comparison. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2012; 237–240: 10–26.
30.
PodvinB. A proper orthogonal-decomposition based model for the wall layer of a turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids2009; 21: 015111–015111.
31.
RempferDFaselHF. Dynamics of three-dimensional coherent structures in a flat-plate boundary layer. J Fluid Mech1994; 275: 257–283.
32.
CazemierWVerstappenRWVeldmanAE. Proper orthogonal decomposition and low-dimensional models for driven cavity flows. Phys Fluids1998; 10(7): 1685–1699.
33.
AubryNHolmesPLumleyJL. The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech1988; 192: 115–173.
34.
SmagorinskyJS. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Mon Weather Rev1963; 91: 99–164.
35.
LaBryerAAttarPVedulaP. Optimal spatio temporal reduced order modeling of the viscous Burgers equation. Finite Elem Anal Des2014; 79: 40–52.
36.
BehzadFHelenbrookBTAhmadiG. On the sensitivity and accuracy of proper orthogonal-decomposition based reduced order models for Burgers equation. Comput Fluids2015; 106: 19–32.
37.
LuoZYangaXZhoubY. A reduced finite difference scheme based on singular value decomposition and proper orthogonal decomposition for Burgers equation. J Comput Appl Math2009; 229(1): 97–107.
38.
LuoZZhoubYYangaX. A reduced finite element formulation based on proper orthogonal decomposition for Burgers equation. Appl Numer Math2009; 59(8): 1933–1946.
39.
Camphouse RC, Djouadi SM and Myatt JH. Feedback control for aerodynamics. Technical Report, Air Force Research Laboratory, USA. Report no. AFRL-VA-WP-TP-2006-348, September 2006.
40.
Camphouse RC and Myatt JH. Feedback control for a two-dimensional Burgers equation system model. In: 2nd AIAA flow control conference, Portland, Oregon, 28 June–1 July 2004, pp.1–12. Reston, VA: AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).
41.
Camphouse RC and Myatt JH. Reduced order modelling and boundary feedback control of nonlinear convection. In: Guidance, navigation, and control conference, San Francisco, California, USA, 15–18 August 2005, pp.1–9. Reston, VA: AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).
42.
KunischKVolkweinS. Control of the Burgers equation by a reduced-order approach using proper orthogonal decomposition. J Optim Theory Appl1999; 102(2): 345–371.
43.
VeroyKPrud’hommeCPateraAT. Reduced-basis approximation of the viscous Burgers equation: rigorous a posteriori error bounds. C R Math2003; 337(9): 619–624.
44.
NguyenNRozzaGPateraAT. Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for the time-dependent viscous Burgers equation. Calcolo2009; 46(3): 157–185.
45.
ArgyropoulosCMarkatosN. Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows. Appl Math Modell2015; 39(2): 693–732.
46.
HassanYABarsamianHR. New-wall modeling for complex flows using the large eddy simulation technique in curvilinear coordinates. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2001; 44(21): 4009–4026.
47.
CordierLNoackBRTissotG. Identification strategies for model-based control. Exp Fluids2013; 54(8): 1–21.
48.
SirisupSKarniadakisG. Stability and accuracy of periodic flow solutions obtained by a POD-penalty method. Physica D2005; 202(3–4): 218–237.
49.
AkhtarINayfehAHRibbensCJ. On the stability and extension of reduced-order Galerkin models in incompressible flows. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn2009; 23(3): 213–237.
50.
HayABorggaardJTPelletierD. Local improvements to reduced-order models using sensitivity analysis of the proper orthogonal decomposition. J Fluid Mech2009; 629: 41–72.
51.
AkhtarIBorggaardJTHayA. Shape sensitivity analysis in flow models using a finite-difference approach. Math Probl Eng2010; 2010: 209780–209780.
52.
HayABorggaardJAkhtarI. Reduced-order models for parameter dependent geometries based on shape sensitivity analysis. J Comput Phys2009; 229(4): 1327–1352.
53.
Akhtar I, Hay A, Borggaard J, et al. Sensitivity analysis-based reduced-order models for flow past an elliptic cylinder. In: 47th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Orlando, Florida, USA, 5–8 January 2009, pp.1–12. Reston, VA: AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).
