A method based on parametric reduced-order models to efficiently predict the transient response of aeroelastic systems with concentrated structural nonlinearities is presented. The approach approximates the nonlinear response in a piecewise-linear manner through time integration of sub-linear reduced-order models; these are parameterized with respect to the nonlinearity and are efficiently obtained by balanced truncation and interpolation. The procedure is applied to the optimization of a wing tip device for passive loads alleviation which features a nonlinear stiffness, showing the effectiveness and efficiency of the methodology.
LeeBHKPriceSJWongYS. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of airfoil: bifurcation and chaos. Prog Aerosp Sci1999; 35: 205–334.
4.
XiangJYanYLiD. Recent advance in nonlinear aeroelastic analysis and control of the aircraft. Chin J Aeronaut2014; 27: 12–22.
5.
Arevalo F, Garcia-Fogeda P and Climent H. Nonlinear time-domain structure/aerodynamics coupling with concentrated structural nonlinearities. In: Proceedings of the 27th ICAS, Nice, France, 19–24 September 2010.
6.
BaeJSYangSMLeeI. Linear and nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of fighter-type wing with control surface. J Aircraft2002; 39: 697–708.
7.
SilvaGHCDal Ben RossettoGDimitriadisG. Reduced order analysis of aeroelastic systems with freeplay using an augmented modal basis. J Aircraft2015; 52: 1312–1325.
8.
EASA, Certification Specification for Large Aeroplanes CS-25 Amendment 3, September 2007.
9.
WrightJRCooperJE. Introduction to aircraft aeroelasticity and loads, 1st ed. New York: Wiley, 2007.
10.
RewienskiMWhiteJ. A trajectory piecewise-linear approach to model order reduction and fast simulation of nonlinear circuits and micromachined devices. IEEE Trans Comput-Aid Des Integr Circuits2003; 22: 155–170.
11.
BrülsODuysinxPGolinvalJC. The global modal parameterization for non-linear model order reduction in flexible multibody dynamics. Int J Numer Meth Eng2007; 69: 948–977.
12.
ChenPCSulaemanE. Nonlinear response of aeroservoelastic systems using discrete state-space approach. AIAA J2003; 41: 1658–1666.
13.
Benner P, Gugercin S and Willcox K. A survey of model reduction methods for parametric systems. Max Planck Institute Magdeburg Preprints, Germany, 14 August 2013.
14.
RicciSCastellaniMRomanelliG. Multi-fidelity design of aeroelastic wing tip devices. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2012; 227: 1596–1607.
15.
AlbanoERoddenWP. A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. AIAA J1969; 7: 279–285.
16.
Roger KL. Airplane math modeling methods for active control design. AGARD CP-228, 1977.
17.
Zentner I and Poirion F. Non-smooth modelling of control surfaces featuring a freeplay nonlinearity in aeroelasticity. In: Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Honolulu, USA, 23–26 April 2007.
18.
KarpelMWiesemanCD. Time simulation of flutter with large stiffness changes. J Aircraft1994; 31: 404–410.
19.
Rose T. Using residual vectors in MSC/NASTRAN dynamic analysis to improve accuracy. In: Proceedings of MSC world users’ conference, 1991.
AntoulasAC. An overview of approximation methods for large-scale dynamical systems. Ann Rev Control2005; 29: 181–190.
22.
AmsallemDFarhatC. Interpolation method for the adaption of reduced-order models to parameter changes and its application to aeroelasticty. AIAA J2008; 46: 1803–1813.
23.
Poussot-VassalCRoosC. Generation of a reduced-order LPV/LFT model from a set of large-scale MIMO LTI flexible aircraft models. Control Eng Pract2012; 20: 919–930.
24.
ZimmermannR. A locally parameterized reduced-order model for the linear frequency domain approach to time-accurate computational fluid dynamics. SIAM J Sci Comput2014; 36: 508–537.
25.
PanzerHMohringJEidR. Parametric model order reduction by matrix interpolation. at-Automatisierungstechnik2010; 58: 475–484.
26.
Castellani M, Lemmens Y and Cooper JE. Parametric reduced order model for rapid prediction of dynamic loads and aeroelastic response with structural nonlinearities. In: Proceedings of the IFASD2015, St. Petersburg, Russia, 28 June to 02 July 2015.
27.
Miller S, Vio GA and Cooper JE. Development of an adaptive wing tip device. In: Proceedings of the 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Palm Springs, USA, 4–7 May 2009.
28.
GuoSLiDLiuY. Multi-objective optimization of a composite wing subject to strength and aeroelastic constraints. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2011; 226: 1095–1106.
29.
Cavagna L, Ricci S and Travaglini L. NeoCASS: An integrated tool for structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis and MDO at conceptual design level. In: Proceedings of the AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, Toronto, Canada, 2–5 August 2010.
30.
KalyanmoyD. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, 1st ed. New York: Wiley, 2001.
