Lap joints are widely used in the manufacture of stiffened panels and influence local panel sub-component stability, defining buckling unit dimensions and boundary conditions. Using the finite element method it is possible to model joints in great detail and predict panel buckling behaviour with accuracy. However, when modelling large panel structures such detailed analysis becomes computationally expensive. Moreover, the impact of local behaviour on global panel performance may reduce as the scale of the modelled structure increases. Thus this study presents coupled computational and experimental analyses, aimed at developing relationships between modelling fidelity and the size of the modelled structure, when the global static load to cause initial buckling is the required analysis output. Small, medium and large specimens representing welded lap-joined fuselage panel structure are examined. Two element types, shell and solid-shell, are employed to model each specimen, highlighting the impact of idealisation on the prediction of welded stiffened panel initial skin buckling.
PauloRMFTeixeira-DiasFValenteRAF. Numerical simulation of aluminium stiffened panels subjected to axial compression: Sensitivity analyses to geometrical imperfections and material properties. Thin-Walled Struct2013; 62: 65–74.
2.
BruhnEF. Analysis and design of flight vehicle structures, 1st ed. Cincinnati, OH: Tri-State Offset Company, 1973.
3.
NASA. NASA Astronautics structures manual1961; vol 3, Washington: NASA.
4.
NiuMC. Airframe stress analysis and sizing, 2nd ed. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Conmilit Press Ltd, 1999.
5.
DombMMElliottWGLeighBR. Modelling of stiffener crippling phenomena using finite element analysis. Can Aeronaut Space J1998; 44: 256–262.
6.
HuSZJiangLA. Finite element simulation of the test procedure of stiffened panels. Marine Struct1998; 11: 75–99.
7.
LynchCMurphyAPriceM. The computational post buckling analysis of fuselage stiffened panels loaded in compression. Thin-Walled Struct2004; 42: 1445–1464.
8.
MurphyAPriceMLynchC. The computational post-buckling analysis of fuselage stiffened panels loaded in shear. Thin-Walled Struct2005; 43: 1455–1474.
9.
CampbellJHeteyLVignjevicR. Non-linear idealisation error analysis of metallic stiffened panel loaded in compression. Thin-Walled Struct2012; 54: 44–53.
10.
RiksE. Buckling and post-buckling analysis of stiffened panels in wing box structures. Int J Solids Struct2000; 37: 6795–6824.
11.
GuoYLLindnerJ. Analysis of elastic-plastic interaction buckling of stiffened panels by spline finite strip method. Comput Struct1993; 46: 529–536.
KhedmatiMRBayatfarARigoP. Post-buckling behaviour and strength of multi-stiffened aluminium panels under combined axial compression and lateral pressure. Marine Struct2010; 23: 39–66.
15.
MurphyAPriceMCurranR. The integration of strength and process modeling of friction-stir-welded fuselage panels. AIAA J Aerosp Comput Inform Commun2006; 3: 159–176.
16.
MurphyAMcCuneWQuinnD. The characterisation of friction stir welding process effects on stiffened panel buckling performance. Thin-Walled Struct2007; 45: 339–351.
17.
MurphyAEkmekyaparTÖzakçaM. Buckling/post-buckling strength of friction stir welded aircraft stiffened panels. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2014; 228: 178–192.
18.
YoonJWBrayGHValenteRAF. Buckling analysis for an integrally stiffened panel structure with a friction stir weld. Thin-Walled Struct2009; 47: 1608–1622.
19.
KhedmatiMRGhavamiK. A numerical assessment of the buckling/ultimate strength characteristics of stiffened aluminium plates with fixed/floating transverse frames. Thin-Walled Struct2009; 47: 1373–1386.
20.
QuinnDMurphyAMcEwanW. Stiffened panel stability behaviour and performance gains with plate prismatic sub-stiffening. Thin-Walled Struct2009; 47: 1457–1468.
21.
HughesOFGhoshBChenY. Improved prediction of simultaneous local and overall buckling of stiffened panels. Thin-Walled Struct2004; 42: 827–856.
22.
PaikJK. Empirical formulations for predicting the ultimate compressive strength of welded aluminum stiffened panels. Thin-Walled Struct2007; 45: 171–184.
PauloRMFCarlonePValenteRAF. Influence of friction stir welding residual stresses on the compressive strength of aluminium alloy plates. Thin-Walled Struct2014; 74: 184–190.
25.
CaseiroJFValenteRAFAndrade-CamposA. On the elasto-plastic buckling of Integrally Stiffened Panels (ISP) joined by Friction Stir Welding (FSW): Numerical simulation and optimization algorithms. Int J Mech Sci2013; 76: 49–59.
26.
MurphyAEkmekyaparTQuinnD. The influence of assembly friction stir weld location on wing panel static strength. Thin-Walled Struct2014; 76: 56–64.
27.
ASTM E837-13. Standard test method for determining residual stresses by hole-drilling strain gage method, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013.
28.
ANSYS. ANSYS User manualCanonsburg, PA: ANSYS.
29.
Murphy A, Price M and Gibson A. Toward virtual testing of airframe stiffened panels. In: Royal Aeronautical Society - virtual testing conference, London, UK, 25–26 October 2006, pp. 1–14.
30.
McCuneRMurphyAPriceM. The influence of friction stir welding process idealisation on residual stress and distortion predictions for future airframe assembly simulations. J Manuf Sci Eng2012; 134: 031011–031011.
31.
BeckerAA. Understanding non-linear finite element analysis - Through illustrative benchmarks, 1st ed. Hamilton, UK: NAFEMS, 2001.
32.
SingerJArboczJWellerT. Buckling experiments: Experimental methods in buckling of thin-walled structures, 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
33.
ShiJ. Computing critical points and secondary paths in nonlinear structural stability analysis by the finite element method. Comput Struct1996; 58: 203–220.
