Inverse simulation allows input time histories to be found that generate specified outputs for non-linear dynamic models in cases where analytical methods of inversion present difficulties. The two approaches considered involve continuous system simulation principles. One is an approximate differentiation method while the second involves feedback principles. These approaches are compared for a non-linear six-degrees-of-freedom flight-mechanics model of a fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle incorporating actuator sub-models with saturation and rate limits. Additional insight is provided through analysis of a linearised version of the vehicle model. It is concluded that both the continuous system simulation methods for finding inverse solutions, for the type of application described in this paper, provide a useful alternative to more conventional iterative methods of inverse simulation based on discrete models. In many cases, including those involving hard non-linearities in control surface actuator sub-systems, they allow issues of vehicle handling and manoeuvrability to be addressed in a more direct fashion than is possible using conventional simulation methods alone.
ThomsonDGBradleyR. The principles and practical application of helicopter inverse simulation. Simul Pract Theory1998; 6: 47–70.
2.
ThomsonDBradleyR. Inverse simulation as a tool for flight dynamics research - Principles and applications. Prog Aerosp Sci2006; 42: 174–210.
3.
HessRAGaoCWangSH. A generalized technique for inverse simulation applied to aircraft maneuvers. AIAA J Guid Control Dyn1991; 14: 920–926.
4.
RutherfordSThomsonDG. Improved methodology for inverse simulation. Aeronaut J1996; 100: 79–86.
5.
LuLMurray-SmithDJThomsonDG. Issues of numerical accuracy and stability in inverse simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory2008; 16: 1350–1364.
6.
Thomson DG and Bradley R. An analytical method for quantifying helicopter agility. In: 12th European rotorcraft forum, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Federal Republic of Germany, September 1986, Paper 45. Bonn, Germany: DGLR.
7.
Thomson DG and Bradley R. Recent developments in the calculation of inverse solutions of the helicopter equations of motion. In: UK Simulation council conference, 1987. University College of North Wales, 9–11 September 1987, pp.227–234. Ghent, Belgium: UKSC.
8.
KatoOSuguiraI. An interpretation of airplane motion and control as inverse problems. AIAA J Guid Control Dyn1986; 9: 198–204.
9.
CeliR. Optimisation based inverse simulation of a helicopter slalom maneuver. AIAA J Guid Control Dyn2000; 23: 289–297.
10.
LeeSKimY. Time domain finite element method for inverse problem of aircraft maneuvers. AIAA J Guid Control Dyn1997; 20: 97–103.
11.
Murray-SmithDJ. Modelling and simulation of integrated systems in engineering, Cambridge, UK: Woodhead, 2012.
12.
BlajerWKołodziejczkyK. Improved DAE formulation for inverse dynamics simulation of cranes. Multibody Syst Dyn2011; 25: 131–143.
13.
Thümme M, Looye G, Kurze M, et al. Nonlinear inverse models for control. In: Schmitz G (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th international modelica conference, Hamburg, Germany, 7–8 March 2005, pp.267–279. Linköping, Sweden: Modelica Organisation.
14.
Murray-Smith DJ. Looking at problems the other way round: engineering applications of inverse simulation based on continuous system simulation methods. In: 8th EUROSIM Congress, Cardiff, Wales, UK, 10–12 September 2013. Invited Keynote Lecture No. 4, http://eurosim2013.info/. (2013, accessed 21 March 2014).
15.
HamelPGAerospace vehicle modelling requirements for high bandwidth flight control. In: CookMVRycroftMJ (eds). Aerospace vehicle dynamics and control, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1994, pp. 1–31.
16.
von GrünhagenWBouwerGPausderHJA high bandwidth control system for the helicopter in-flight simulator ATTHeS – modelling, performance and applications. In: TischlerMB (ed). Advances in aircraft flight control, London, UK: Taylor and Francis, 1996, pp. 73–101.
17.
Buchholz JJ and von Grünhagen W. Inversion impossible? Technical Report, University of Applied Sciences, Bremen, Germany, 2004.
18.
Tagawa Y and Fukui K. Inverse dynamics calculation of nonlinear model using low sensitivity compensator. In: Proceedings of dynamics and design conference, Japan, 1994, pp.185–188.
19.
Venture G, Kojima T and Tagawa Y. Fast motion control of robotic systems using inverse dynamics compensation via ‘simulation of feedback control systems’ (IDCS). In: Proceedings of 1st joint conference on multibody system dynamics, 25–27 May 2010, Lapeenranta, Finland.
20.
TagawaYTuJYStotenDP. Inverse dynamics compensation via ‘simulation of feedback control systems’. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2012; 225: 137–153.
21.
Murray-SmithDJ. Feedback methods for inverse simulation of dynamic models for engineering system applications. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst2011; 17: 515–541.
22.
Murray-SmithDJ. The application of parameter sensitivity analysis methods to inverse simulation models. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst2013; 19: 67–90.
23.
Murray-SmithDJ. Inverse simulation and analysis of underwater vehicle dynamics using feedback principle. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst2014; 20: 45–65.
24.
FieldingCFluxPK. Nonlinearities in flight control systems. Aeronaut J2003; 107: 673–696.
25.
DucardGGJ. Fault-tolerant flight control and guidance systems: Practical methods for small unmanned aerial vehicles, London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2009.
26.
Winit R. Sensor fault-tolerant control system for unmanned aerial vehicle. MSc Thesis, University of Glasgow, UK, 2010.
27.
Lone MM and Cooke AK. Effects of nonlinear flight control system elements on aircraft manual control. Report No. CU/COA-2011/01, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, UK, 2011.
28.
O’ReillyJLeitheadWE. Multivariable control by ‘individual channel design’. Int J Control1991; 54: 1–46.
