Experimental study on combustion mode transition effects in a strut-based scramjet combustor

Abstract

A strut-based scramjet combustor was operated in three different combustion modes under Mach 2.5 inflow conditions, scramjet mode, weak ramjet mode, and strong ramjet mode. The combustion mode transition effects are investigated through ground experiments. The scramjet mode occurred below the overall fuel equivalence ratio of around 0.44. Transition from the scramjet mode to the weak ramjet mode occurred at ER ∼ 0.44, accompanied by a sudden increase in thrust. By contrast, transition from the weak ramjet mode to strong ramjet mode occurred at ER ∼ 0.6125, accompanied by a sudden decrease in thrust. In particularly, combustion mode transitions significantly change the dominant characteristics of the flow field.

Keywords

Scramjet combustor combustion mode transition thrust sudden change flow field

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Curran

. Scramjet engines: The first forty years. J Propul Power 2001; 17: 1138–1148.

Curran

Murthy

SNB

. Scramjet propulsion (Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics) 2000; vol. 189, Reston, VA: AIAA, pp. 588–593.

Billig

. Combustion processes in supersonic flow. AIAA J Propul Power 1988; 4: 209–216.

Heiser

Pratt

. Hypersonic airbreathing propulsion (AIAA Education Series), Washington, DC: AIAA, 1994, pp. 339–346.

Sullins

. Demonstration of mode transition in a scramjet combustor. J Propul Power 1993; 9: 515–520.

Takahashi S, Tanaka H, Noborio D, et al. Mach 2 supersonic combustion with hydrocarbon fuels in a rectangular scramjet combustor. In: International symposium on airbreathing engines, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 31 August–5 September 2003, ISABE 2003-1172. USA: American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics.

Mitani

Chinzei

Kanda

. Reaction and mixing-controlled combustion in scramjet engines. J Propul Power 2001; 17: 308–314.

Takahashi S, Demise S, Oshita M, et al. Correlation between heat flux distribution and combustion mode in a scramjet combustor.In: International symposium on airbreathing engines, Bangalore, India, 3 September–7 September 2001, ISABE 2001-1191. USA: American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics.

Kouchi

Masuya

Mitani

. Mechanism and control of combustion-mode transition in a scramjet engine. J Propul Power 2012; 28: 106–112.

10.

Yentsch RJ and Gaitonde DV. Book series .Unsteady three-dimensional phenomena in mode-transition simulations of the HIFiRE-2 scramjet flowpath. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference, San Jose, CA, 14–17 July 2013.

11.

Turner

Smart

. Mode change characteristics of a three-dimensional scramjet at Mach 8. J Propul Power 2013; 29: 982–990.

12.

Fotia

Driscoll

. Ram-scram transition and flame/shock-train interactions in a model scramjet experiment. J Propul Power 2013; 29: 261–273.

13.

Riggins D, Tackett R, Taylor T, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of dual-mode scramjet engine operation and performance. In: 14th AIAA/AHI space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, Canberra, Australia, 6 November--9 November 2006, AIAA Paper 2006-8059. USA: American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics.

14.

Starkey

Lewis

. Sensitivity of hydrocarbon combustion modeling for hypersonic missile design. J Propul Power 2003; 19: 89–97.

15.

Micka DJ and Driscoll JF. Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flame holder. In: Proceedings of the combustion institute, vol. 32, Montreal, Canada, 3–8 August 2008, No.2397-2404. Elsevier Inc.

16.

Huang

Pourkashanian

. Flow-field analysis of a typical hydrogen-fueled dual-mode scramjet combustor. J Aerosp Eng 2012; 25(3): 336–346.

17.

Van Driest

. Turbulent boundary layer in compressible fluids. J Aeronaut Sci 1951; 18: 145–160.