This paper presents an extension of fuzzy-multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) optimization methodology that could effectively be used to find the overall satisfaction of objective functions (selecting the design variables) in the early stages of design process. The coupling of objective functions due to design variables in an engineering design process will result in difficulties in design optimization problems. The primary application of this methodology is the design of a liquid propellant engine with the maximum specific impulse and the minimum weight. The independent design variables in this model are combustion chamber pressure, exit pressure, oxidizer to fuel mass flow rate. To handle the mentioned problems, a fuzzy-multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization methodology is developed based on Pareto optimal set. Liquid propellant engine, F-1 is modeled to illustrate accuracy and efficiency of proposed methodology.
HuangaH-ZGubY-KDuX. An interactive fuzzy multi-objective optimization method for engineering design. J Eng Appl Artif Intell2006; 6(5): 451–460.
2.
Manikanda KumaranRRajamanoharD. Modeling of exhaust gas cooler in a high altitude test facility of large area ratio rocket engines. J Aerospace Eng.Epub ahead of print 10 August 2013. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000378.
3.
PalmnäsUSundénR. Parametric design study of a 20 kN high performance storable propellant pump-fed engine. Acta Astronaut1988; 17(8): 837–852.
4.
HassanKAmirNAmirZ. Integration of modeling and simulation of warm pressurization and feed systems of liquid propulsion systems. Acta Astronaut2011; 69(5–6): 258–265.
5.
CaiGFangJLiuM. Performance prediction and optimization for liquid rocket engine nozzle. Aerospace Sci Technol2007; 11(2–3): 155–162.
6.
SchleyC-AHagemannGKrülleG. Towards an optimal concept for numerical codes simulating thrust chamber processes in high pressure chemical propulsion systems. Aerospace Sci Technol1997; 1(3): 203–213.
7.
KosugiYOyamaAFujiiK. Multidisciplinary and multi-objective design exploration methodology for conceptual design of a hybrid rocket. Infotech@Aerospace2011.. St. Louis, Missuori: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29–31 March.
8.
CaiGFangJZhengY. Optimization of system parameters for liquid rocket engines with gas-generator cycles. J Propulsion Power2010; 26(1): 113–119.
9.
Jean-Marius T. Multidisciplinary optimization for early system design of expandable launchers. In: 11th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Portsmouth, Virginia, 2006.
10.
Balesdent M, Berend N and Depincez P. Optimal design of expendable launch vehicles using stage-wise MDO formulation. In: 13th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis optimization conference, Fort Worth, Texas, 2010.
11.
BayleyDJHart FieldRJ JrBurkhalterJE. Design optimization of a space launch vehicle using a genetic algorithm. J Spacecraft Rockets2008; 45(4): 733–740.
12.
QinJBaoWZhouW. Comparison analysis between expander cycle and re-cooling cycle for a scramjet. J Aerospace Eng2012; 25(3): 347–355.
13.
SaqlainAHeL-S. Optimization and sizing for propulsion system of liquid rocket using genetic algorithm. Chin J Aeronaut2007; 20(1): 40–46.
14.
SungH-GYangV. A unified analysis of the internal flow field in an integrated rocket ramjet engine, Part I: transition from rocket booster to ramjet sustainer. J Aerospace Eng. Epub ahead of print 18 May2012. . DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000255.
15.
CaiGDuZJinP. Numerical and experimental investigation on dual shear coaxial gas-gas injector. J Aerospace Eng. Epub ahead of print 21 September2011. . DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000166.
16.
SungH-GYangV. A unified analysis of the internal flow field in an integrated rocket ramjet engine, Part II: ramjet sustainer. J Aerospace Eng. Epub ahead of print Published: 18 May2012.. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000256.
17.
SongCYLeeJChoungJM. Reliability-based design optimization of an FPSO riser support using moving least squares response surface meta-models. Ocean Eng2011; 38(2–3): 304–318.
18.
Ali Azizi OroumiehMMohammad Bagher MalaekSAshrafizaadehM. Aircraft design cycle time reduction using artificial intelligence. Aerospace Sci Technol2013; 26(1): 244–258.
19.
KonakaACoitbDWSmithAE. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. J Reliabil Eng Syst Saf2006; 91(9): 992–1007.
20.
DebK. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
Coello CoelloCALamontGB. Applications of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, Singapore: World Scientific, 2004.
23.
DebKPratapAAgarwalS. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2002; 6(2): 182–197.
24.
ZitzlerEThieleL. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evol Comput1999; 3(4): 257–271.
25.
Zitzler E, Laumanns M and Thiele L. SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithms. TIK-Report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Instituteof Technology (ETH) Zurich, 2001.
Ishibuchi H. Multiobjective genetic fuzzy systems: review and future research directions. In: International conference on fuzzy systems, London, UK, 23–26 July 2007, pp.913–918.
28.
CordonOHerreraFHoffmannF. Genetic FuzzySystems, Singapore: World Scientific, 2001.
29.
CordonOGomideFHerreraF. Ten years of genetic fuzzy systems: current framework and new trends. Fuzzy Sets Syst2004; 141(1): 5–31.
30.
HerreraF. Genetic fuzzy systems: status, critical considerations and future directions. Int J Comput Intell Res2005; 1(1): 59–67.
31.
CasillasJCordonOHerreraF. Interpretability issues in fuzzy modeling, Germany: Springer, 2003.
32.
CasillasJCordonOHerreraF. Accuracy improvements in linguistic fuzzy modeling, Germany: Springer, 2003.
33.
IshibuchiHNakashimaTNiiM. Classification and modeling with linguistic information granules: advanced approaches to linguistic data mining, Berlin: Springer, 2004.
GhoshADehuriSGhoshS. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for knowledge discovery from data bases, Berlin: Springer, 2008.
36.
Fonseca CM and Fleming PJ. Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization, formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on genetic algorithms, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1993, pp.416–423.
37.
Deb K and Goldberg DE. An investigation of niche and species formation in genetic function optimization. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on genetic algorithms, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1989, pp.42–50.
Peng PK and Hitam MS. Multiobjective optimization using fuzzy genetic algorithms. In: Empowering science, technology and innovation towards a better tomorrow, UMTAS, 2011.
Smith JF and Rhyne RD. A fuzzy logic algorithm for optimal allocation of distributed resources. In: International conference on information fusion, Sunnyvale, 1999.
44.
Huzel DK and Huang DH. Modern engineering for design of liquid propellant rocket engines. USA: AIAA, 1992.
45.
HumbleRWHenryGNLarsonWJ. Space propulsion analysis and design, USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1995.
MahyariMNKarimiHNasehH. Numerical and experimental investigation of vortex breaker effectiveness on the improvement in launch vehicle ballistic parameters. J Mech Sci Technol2010; 24(10): 1997–2006.
48.
HaidnOJ. Advanced rocket engines, Lampoldshausen: German Aerospace Center (DLR), 2008.
49.
MATLAB. A technical computing environment for high-performance numeric computation and visualization. USA: The Math Works Inc., 2007.
50.
KartalopoulosSV. Understanding neural networks and fuzzy logic basic concepts and applications, USA: Wiley-IEEE Press, 1996.
51.
RossTJ. Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, England, 2004.
52.
WangLX. A course in fuzzy systems and control, USA: Prentice Hall International Inc, 1997.
53.
WangL-X.A course in fuzzy systems, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1997.
54.
MartínezMGarcía-NietoSSanchisJ. Genetic algorithms optimization for normalized normal constraint method under Pareto construction. Adv Eng Software2009; 40(4): 260–267.
55.
Vicente Hultmann AyalaHdos Santos CoelhoL. Tuning of PID controller based on a multiobjective genetic algorithm applied to a robotic manipulator. J Expert Syst Appl2012; 39: 8968–8974.
