Conceptual design and analysis of blended-wing-body aircraft

Abstract

Due to the unconventional nature of the blended wing body (BWB) no off-the-shelf software package exists for its conceptual design. This study details a first step towards the implementation of traditional and BWB-specific design and analysis methods into a software tool to enable preliminary sizing of a BWB. The tool is able to generate and analyze different BWB configurations on a conceptual level. This paper investigates three different BWB configurations. The first configuration is an aft-swept BWB with aft-mounted engines, the second configuration is an aft-swept BWB with wing-mounted engines and the third configuration is a forward-swept BWB with wing-mounted engines. These aircraft comply with the same set of top-level requirements and airworthiness requirements. Each of the designs has been optimized for maximum harmonic range, while keeping its maximum take-off weight constant and identical. Results show that the forward-swept configuration with wing-mounted engines has the highest harmonic range. These findings warrant further investigation in this configuration and other alternative BWB configurations.

Keywords

Blended-wing-body aircraft conceptual design Multi-disciplinary design optimization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Denning

Allen

Armstrong

. The broad delta airliner. Aeronaut J 2003; 107(1075): 547–558.

Liebeck

. Design of the blended wing body subsonic transport. J Aircraft 2004; 41: 10–25.

Hileman

Spakovszky

Drela

. Airframe design for silent fuel-efficient aircraft. J Aircraft 2010; 47: 956–970.

Roskam

. Airplane design, Part I: Preliminary sizing of airplanes, Lawrence, KS: DARcorp, 1990.

Roskam

. Airplane design, Part I: Preliminary sizing of aircraft, Lawrence, KS: DARcorp, 2005.

Morris AJ. MOB A European distributed multi-disciplinary design and optimisation project. Cranfield University, 2002. AIAA 2002-5444.

Raymer

. Aircraft design: A conceptual approach, Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 2006.

Anon. Jane’s all the world’s aircraft, http://jawa.janes.com/ (2011).

Diedrich A, Hileman J, Tan D, et al. Multidisciplinary design and optimization of the silent aircraft. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2006. AIAA 2006-1323.

10.

Bolsunovsky

Buzoverya

Gurevich

. Flying wing: Problems and decisions. In: Torenbeek E and Deconinck H (eds) Innovative configurations and advanced concepts for future civil aircraft 2005.

11.

Laban M, Arendsen P, Rouwhorst WFJA, et al. A computational design engine for multi-disciplinary optimisation with application to a blended wing body configuration. National Aerospace Laboratory, NLR, 2002. AIAA 2002-5446.

12.

Geuskens FJJMM, Koussios S, Bergsma OK, et al. Non-cylindrical pressure fuselages for future aircraft. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2008. AIAA 2008-1907.

13.

Melin

. A vortex lattice MATLAB implementation for linear aerodynamic wing applications, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology, 2000.

14.

Roskam

. Airplane design, Part VI: Preliminary calculation of aerodynamic, thrust and power characteristics, Lawrence, KS: The University of Kansas, 1990.

15.

Kroo

. Aircraft design, synthesis and analysis, Palo Alto, CA: Desktop Aeronautics, Inc., 2001.

16.

Torenbeek

. Development and application of a comprehensive, design-sensitive weight prediction method for wing structures of transport category aircraft, Delft: Delft University of Technology, 1992.

17.

Geuskens FJJMM, Bergsma OK and Beukers A. Analysis of conformable pressure vessels: Introducing the multibubble. Delft University of Technology, 2011. AIAA 54561-869.

18.

Obert

. Aerodynamic design of transport aircraft, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2009.