Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Given their hovering ability, static lift airships, such as airships and balloons, are proposed as stratospheric platforms flying at a high altitude of 20 km. The shape of the envelope has a major influence on the lift and drag efficiency of an airship. Furthermore, the efficiency of a conventional actuator, such as an aerodynamic control surface for stratospheric platforms, is decreased by the low-atmospheric density and flight speed. Thus, a new type of effector configuration must be proposed. A new multivectored thrust airship called flat peach is proposed in this paper. The name is attributed to the shape of the airship, which resembles a flat peach that is a cross between a ball and a water droplet. Thus, this airship has a smaller drag coefficient than the spherical airship and higher lift efficiency than a conventional airship. A control allocation strategy among the multivectored thrusters is proposed, and a composite control structure is designed for the airship to realize accurate position control and to decrease energy consumption.

Keywords

Stratospheric airship flat peach multi-vectored thrusters control allocation composite control structure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Smith S, Fortenberry M, Lee M, et al. HiSentinel80: flight of a high altitude airship. In: 11th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations (ATIO) conference, Virginia Beach, VA, 2011.

Khoury

Gillett

. Airship technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Balaskovic P. Program of atlas airship. In: Proceedings of the symposium on ‘the future of the airship: a technical appraisal', Royal Aeronautical Society, London, 20 November 1975. The Society.

West J. Skyship-present activities. In: Proceedings of the symposium on ‘The future of the airship: a technical appraisal’, Royal Aeronautical Society, London, 20 November 1975. The Society.

Ishkov

Panyaev

. The Russian thermoplane ALA programme (Disc-Shaped LTA’s): today and tomorrow. Airship 1993; 100: 5–8.

Rooz N and Johnson EN. Design and modeling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, San Francisco, California, 2005.

Coulombe P and Nahon M. Experimental characterization and simulation of a tethered spherical helium balloon in an outdoor environment. In: AIAA 5th aviation, technology, integration, and operations conference (ATIO), Arlington, Virginia, 2005.

Larry D and Friese J. Unconventional design for a lighter-than-air mini UAV. Infotech@Aerospace, Arlington, Virginia, 2005.

Chen

Zhou

Yan

. Composite control strategy of stratospheric airships with moving masses. J Aircraft 2012; 49(3): 794–801.

10.

Smith MS and Rainwater EL. Development and application of the elastica shape for pressurized balloons. In: International symposium on space technology and science, Tokyo, 2002.

11.

Wang

Duan

. Experimental investigations on aerodynamic characteristics of the ZHIYUAN-1 airship. J Aircraft 2010; 47(4): 1463–1469.

12.

Wang XL, Ma Y and Shan XX. Modeling of stratosphere airship. In: IEEE the 3rd international symposium on systems and control in aeronautics and astronautics, Harbin, China, 8--10 June 2010, pp.738–743. USA: IEEE.

13.

Liesk T and Nahon M. Dynamics modeling for an unmanned, unstable, fin-less airship. In: 18th AIAA lighter-than-air systems technology conference, Seattle, Washington, 2009.

14.

Liesk T. Integral backstepping control of an unmanned, unstable, fin-less airship. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010.

15.

Battipede M, Gili PA and Lando M. Control allocation system for an innovative remotely-piloted airship. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit, Providence, Rhode Island, Prashant Peddiraju, 2004.

16.

Battipede M, Gili P and Lando M. Ground station and flight simulator for a remotely-piloted non conventional airship. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, California, San Francisco, 2005.

17.

Berge SP and Fossen TI. Robust control allocation of overactuated ships: experiments with a model ship. In: Proceedings of the 4th IFAC, conference on maneuvering and control of marine craft, Brijuni, Croatia, 1997, pp.166–171.

18.

Johansen

Fossen

Berge

. Constraint nonlinear control allocation with singularity avoidance using sequential quadratic programming. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2004; TCST-12: 211–216.

19.

Liesk

Nahon

Boulet

. Design and experimental validation of a nonlinear low-level controller for an unmanned fin-less airship. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2013; 21(1): 149–161.

20.

Mazhar H, Nahon M and Liesk T. Validation of a dynamics model and controller for an unmanned, finless airship. In: Proceedings of 20th AIAA lighter-than-air systems technology conference, Daytona Beach, Florida, 2013.

21.

Purtojo and Wahyudi. Integral anti-windup scheme of full-state feedback control for point-to point (PTP) positioning system. In: 2008 international conference on electronic design, Penang, Malaysia, 2008.

Control system design of a multivectored thrust stratospheric airship

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References