This article introduces a tool chain for extended physics-based wing mass estimation. Compared to state-of-the-art tool chains, the physics-based structural modelling is extended beyond the wing primary structure. The structural model also includes the movable trailing edge devices including tracks, the spoilers, the engine pylons and the landing gear. The chain consists of the structural analysis model, models for aerodynamic, fuel, landing gear and engine loads as well as a sizing algorithm. To make the complexity of the model generation process feasible for preliminary aircraft design, a knowledge-based approach is chosen. This means that the analysis models are created partly automatically, which leads to a minimum set of required input parameters for the central model generator. The DLR aircraft parametrisation format Common Parametric Aircraft Configuration Scheme is used as central data model for input and output. Therefore, the chain can be easily included in a wider multidisciplinary aircraft design environment.
Kelm R, Läpple M and Grabietz M. Wing primary structure weight estimation of transport aircraft in the pre-development phase. In: 54th annual conference of society of allied weight engineers (SAWE), Huntsville, AL, 1995, paper no. 2283.
2.
Elham A, La Rocca G and Vos R. Refined preliminary weight estimation tool for airplane wing and tail. In: SAE aerotech congress & exhibition. Toulouse, France, 2011, SAE paper 2011-01-2765.
3.
Rizzi A, Oppelstrup J, Zhang M, et al. Coupling parametric aircraft lofting to CFD & CSM grid generation for conceptual design. In: AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Orlando, USA, 2011.
Hürlimann F, Kelm R, Dugas M, et al. Mass estimation of transport aircraft wingbox structures with a CAD/DAE-based multidisciplinary process. Aerosp Sci Technol 2010; 15(4): 323–333.
6.
Kessler E, Laban M and Vankan WJ. Multidisciplinary wing optimisation. VIVACE Forum, 2005.
7.
Oltmann KM. Virtual engineering models for aircraft structure weight estimation. In: 66th annual conference of society of allied weight engineers (SAWE), Madrid, Spain, 2007, paper no. 3418.
8.
Anhalt C, Monner HP and Breitbach E. Interdisciplinary wing design – structural aspects. SAE paper 2003-01-3026, 2003.
CavagnaLRicciSTravagliniL. NeoCASS: an integrated tool for structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis and MDO at conceptual design level. Progr Aerosp Sci2011; 47(8): 621–635.
11.
CavagnaLRicciSRiccobeneL. Structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis, and optimization in aircraft conceptual design. J Aircr2011; 48(6): 1840–1855.
12.
HoweD. The prediction of aircraft wing mass. J Aerosp Eng1996; 210(G3): 135–145.
13.
Perez R, Jansen P and Martins J. Aero-structural optimization of non-planar lifting surface configurations. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2008.
14.
Ardema M, Chambers MC, Patron AP, et al. Analytical fuselage and wing weight estimation of transport aircraft. NASA Technical Memorandum 110392, 1996.
15.
McCullers LA. Flight optimization system, release 7.70, user’s guide, 2009. Hampton, USA: NASA Langley Research Center.
16.
Dugas M and Schroeder K. FAME-ACSS documentation (analytical calculation of secondary wing structure). Internal Report, Airbus Deutschland GmbH, 2004.
17.
La Rocca G. Knowledge based engineering techniques to support aircraft design and optimization, PhD Thesis, TU Delft, the Netherlands, 2011.
18.
Cooper D and La Rocca G. Knowledge-based techniques for developing engineering applications in the 21st century. In: 7th AIAA ATIO conference, Belfast, Northern Ireland, 2007.
19.
Nagel B, Böhnke D, Gollnick V, et al. Communication in aircraft design: can we establish a common language? In: 28th congress of the international council of the aeronautical sciences (ICAS), Brisbane, Australia, 2012.
20.
LierschCHepperleM. A distributed toolbox for multidisciplinary preliminary aircraft design. CEAS Aeronaut J2011; 2(1–4): 57–68.
21.
Drela M and Youngren H. AVL 3.30 User Primer. MIT Department of Aero & Astronautical Engineering, April 2010. Boston, USA: MIT Aero & Astro.
22.
Dorbath F, Nagel B and Gollnick V. A knowledge based approach for automated modeling of extended wing structures in preliminary aircraft design. In: 60th Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress, Bremen, Germany, 2011.
23.
Dorbath F, Nagel B and Gollnick V. Implementation of a tool chain for extended physics-based wing mass estimation in early design stages. In: 71st Annual conference of society of allied weight engineers (SAWE), Bad Gögging, Germany, 2012.
24.
Werner-SpatzCHeinzeWHorstP. Improved representation of high-lift devices for a multidisciplinary conceptual aircraft design process. J Aircr2009; 46(6): 1984–1994.
25.
RajeswariBDuttHNV. Analysis of wing flap configurations by a nonplanar vortex lattice method. J Aircr1988; 25(2): 97–98.
26.
Hövelmann A. Aerodynamic investigations of noise-reducing high-lift systems for passenger transport aircraft. Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität München (TUM), Germany, 2011.
27.
Dargel G, Hansen H, Wild J, et al. Aerodynamische flügelauslegung mit multifunktionalen steuerflächen (aerodynamic design of wings with multi-functional control devices). In: DGLR Jahrbuch 2002, paper no. DGLR-2002-096, Vol I, DGLR, pp.1605, 2002, Bonn, Germany: DGLR.
28.
Young WC and Budynas RG. Roark's Formulas for stress and strain. 7th ed. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 2002.
29.
Gürdal Z, Haftka R and Hajela P. Design and optimization of laminated composite materials. New York, USA: Wiley, 1999.
30.
PuckA. Festigkeitsanalyse von faser-matrix-laminaten – modelle für die Praxis, München: Carl Hanser Verlag, 1996.
ShanleyFR. Weight-strength analysis of aircraft structures, New York, NY: Dover, 1960.
33.
Anhalt C. Steigerung der aerodynamischen Effizienz von Hochauftriebsklappen – Vergleich adaptiver und passive Maßnahmen, Forschungsbericht 2004-14, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), 2004.
34.
Pincha P. Algorithmic mass-factoring of finite element model analysis. In: 41st Annual conference of society of allied weight engineers (SAWE), San Jose, CA, 1982, paper no. 14.
35.
Dorbath F, Nagel B and Gollnick V. A knowledge based approach for extended physics-based wing mass estimation in early design stages. In: 28th Conference of the international council of aeronautical sciences (ICAS), Brisbane, Australia, 2012.
