This article describes a new methodology allowing a combined exploration of experience feedback databases. Based on a small set of data provided by an airline, the study demonstrates the feasibility and the benefit for safety management of this new approach, which highlights links between human-factor components revealed by crew reports and operational deviations detected through digital flight data. Such a new understanding of the insight of the operations could have a major impact on safety management and should contribute to the proactive safety management culture that many airlines try to promote.
SheridanTB. Risk, human error, and system resilience: fundamental ideas. Hum Factors2008; 50(3): 418–426.
2.
McFaddenKLTowellER. Aviation human factors: a framework for the new millennium. J Air Transp Manage1999; 5: 177–184.
3.
O’ConnorPO’DeaAKennedyK. Measuring safety climate in aviation: a review and recommendations for the future. Saf Sci2011; 49: 128–138.
4.
Statler I. The aviation system monitoring and modeling (ASMM) project: a documentation of its history and accomplishments: 1999–2005. NASA/TP-2007-214556, 2007. Washington, DC: NASA, http://www.ntrs.nasa.gov.
5.
Federal Aviation Administration. Voluntary safety programs: response to P.L. 111-216, Sec. 213. 28 January 2011. Washington, DC: FAA, http://www.faa.gov.
6.
RoelenALCLinPHHaleAR. Accident models and organisational factors in air transport: the need for multi-method models. Saf Sci2011; 49: 5–10.
7.
WiegmannDAShappellSA. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: the human factors analysis and classification system, Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003.
8.
BakerDPKrokosKJ. Development and validation of aviation causal contributors for error reporting systems (ACCERS). Hum Factors2007; 49(2): 185–199.
9.
Amidan BG and Ferryman TA. Atypical pattern detection within complex systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE aerospace conference, Manhattan Beach, CA, 5–12 March 2005.
10.
SmartEBrownDDenmanJ. Combining multiple classifiers to quantitatively rank the impact of abnormalities in flight data. Appl Soft Comput2012; 12: 2583–2592.
11.
Budalakotis S, Srivastava AN and Akella R. Discovering atypical flights is sequences of discrete flight parameters. In: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE aerospace conference, Big Sky, Montana, 4–11 March 2006.
12.
Posse C, Matzke B, Anderson C, et al. Extracting human performance factors from aviation safety reports using a common pattern specification language. In: Proceedings of IEEE aerospace conference, Manhattan Beach, CA, 5–12 March 2005.
13.
MailleNStatlerIChaudronL. An application of FCA to the analysis of aeronautical incidents. Lect Notes Artif Intell2005; 3403: 145–161, Berlin: Springer.
14.
ReasonJ. Human error, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
15.
CabonPDeharvengtSBerechetIFrom flight time limitations to fatigue risk management systems – a way toward resilience. In: HollnagelEParièsJWoodsDD (eds). Resilience engineering in practice:a guidebook, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2010, pp. 364–364.
16.
GanterBWilleR. Formal concept analysis: mathematical foundations, New York: Berlin Springer, 1999.
17.
Airbus. Airbus flight profile specifications. [CD Rom]. 2002. Toulouse: Airbus.
18.
CabonPDeharvengtSGrauJY. Research and guidelines for implementing fatigue risk management systems for the French regional airlines. Accid Anal Prev2012; 45S: 41–44, Elsevier.
19.
Stewart S, Holmes A, Jackson P, et al. An integrated system for managing fatigue risk within a low cost carrier. In: Proceedings of the 59th annual international air safety seminar (IASS), Paris, France, 23–26 October 2006.
20.
Lahcen B and Kwuida L. Lattice miner: a tool for concept lattice construction and exploration. In: Supplementary proceedings of the international conference on formal concept analysis (ICFCA’10), Agadir, Morocco, 15–18 March 2010.
21.
Becker P, Hereth J, Stumme G, et al. An open source tool for qualitative data analysis. In: Proceedings of workshop FCAKDD of the 15th European conference on artificial intelligence, Lyon, France, 23 July 2002.
22.
Valtchev P, Grosser D, Roume C, et al. GALICIA: an open platform for lattices. In: Using conceptual structures: contributions to the 11th international conference on conceptual structures, Dresde, DE, 21–25 July 2003.
23.
Chaudron L, Maille N and Gobert JL. Sound engineering for aircraft: the “Virtual Resident” project. In: 18th international congress on acoustics, Kyoto, Japan, 4–9 April 2004.
TanPNSteinbachMKumarV. Introduction to data mining: association analysis, Chap. 6. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2006.
26.
Pasquier N. Mining association rules using formal concept analysis. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on conceptual structures, Darmstadt, Germany, 14–18 August 2000.
