The article describes a feasibility study to assess the use of nanotubes-based composites to mitigate tail buffeting. The buffeting of a representative business jet rudder is considered as case study. The baseline rudder configuration consists in a sandwich structure with honeycomb core and carbon/epoxy IM7/8552 skins. The damping characteristics of the baseline rudder configuration are compared to those achieved employing constrained layer Al/3M467 skin patches, and those obtained by dispersing multi-walled carbon nanotubes in the baseline carbon/epoxy material. The loads applied to the rudder during flight are obtained by airworthiness standards. Static and dynamic finite element analyses of the rudder under flight loads are carried out to evaluate the structural response at two different temperatures, −40 ℃ and +30 ℃. IM7/8552/MWNT with 1.5 wt% nanofiller is shown to have the best overall performance for the case study considered here, with the potential of outperforming conventional constrained layer patches for buffeting mitigation.
HuHOnyebuekeLAbatanA. Characterizing and modeling mechanical properties of nanocomposites-review and evaluation. J Miner Mater Charact Eng2010; 9(4): 275–319.
2.
LiuHBrinsonLC. Reinforcing efficiency of nanoparticles: a simple comparison for polymer nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68(6): 1502–1512.
3.
ThostensonETRenZChouT-W. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61(13): 1899–1912.
Federal Aviation Administration. Vibration, buffet and aeroelastic stability requirements for transport category airplanes. 14 CFR Part 25, D, 29 June 1992.
10.
Ryall TG, Moses RW, Hopkins MA, et al. Buffet load alleviation. In: Proceedings of the second Australian congress on applied mechanics, Paper R-017, Canberra, Australia, 1999.
11.
Burnham JK. Predicted dynamic buffet loads from limited response measurements: T-45 horizontal tail. In: 36th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, 10–13 April 1995, AIAA Paper 95-1338-CP.
12.
RajaSDesign and development of a smart composite T-tail for transport aircraft. In: DattaguruBGopalakrishnanSAatreVK (eds). IUTAM Symposium on multi-functional material structures and systems, Netherlands: Springer, 2010, pp. 241–249.
13.
Hanagud S, de Noyer MB and Luo H. Tail buffet alleviation of high performance twin tail aircraft using piezo-stack actuators. AIAA-99-1320. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1999.
14.
PanLZhangB. A new method for the determination of damping in cocured composite laminates with embedded viscoelastic layer. J Sound Vibr2009; 319(3-5): 822–831.
15.
EsawiAMKFaragMM. Carbon nanotube reinforced composites: potential and current challenges. Mater Design2007; 28(9): 2394–2401.
16.
JacksonPMunsonKPeacockL. Jane's all the world's aircraft 2009-10, Coulsdon, UK: Jane's Information Group, 2010.
17.
Howe D. Aircraft loading and structural layout. AIAA Education Series. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2004.
CamanhoPPMaimíPDávilaCG. Prediction of size effects in notched laminates using continuum damage mechanics. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(13): 2715–2727.
20.
KoerberHXavierJCamanhoPP. High strain rate characterisation of unidirectional carbon-epoxy IM7-8552 in transverse compression and in-plane shear using digital image correlation. Mechanics of Mater2010; 42(11): 1004–1019.
21.
FooCCChaiGBSeahLK. Mechanical properties of Nomex material and Nomex honeycomb structure. Compos Struct2007; 80(4): 88–594.
Ji Y. Multiscale investigations on structural properties and mechanical applications of carbon nanotube sheets. PhD Thesis, The University of Akron, USA, 2007.
31.
NouriNZiaei-RadS. Mechanical property evaluation of carbon nanotube sheets. Trans F: Nanotechnology2010; 17(2): 90–101.
32.
JonesDIG. Handbook of viscoelastic vibration damping, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2001, pp. 176–176.
33.
Rajoria H and Jalili N. Determination of strength and damping characteristics of carbon nanotube epoxy composites. In: Proceedings of 2004 ASME international mechanical engineering congress & exposition, Anaheim, CA, November 2004.
34.
HalpinJCKardosJL. Halpin-Tsai equations: a review. Polym Eng Sci1976; 16(5): 344–352.
35.
HwangWLeeC. Modified rule of mixtures for prediction of tensile strength of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites. J Mater Sci Lett1998; 17(19): 1601–1603.
36.
BarkanovSESkukisEWesolowskiM. Characterization of adhesive layers in sandwich composites by nondestructive technique. Proc World Acad Sci Eng Technol2009, pp. 38–38.
37.
XuMFutabaDNYamadaT. Carbon nanotubes nanotubes with temperature-invariant viscoelasticity from –196° to 1000° C. J Mater Sci2010; 330: 1364–1368.
38.
Liu Y. Large frequency bandwidth damping in MWCNT nanocomposites. MSc Thesis, Advanced Composites Centre for Innovation and Science, University of Bristol, 2009.
BerthelotJ-MSefraniY. Longitudinal and transverse damping of unidirectional fibre composites. Compos Struct2007; 79(3): 423–431.
41.
RajaramSTonganWNuttS. Sound transmission loss of honeycomb sandwich panels. Noise Contr Eng J2006; 54(2): 106–115.
42.
ChouTWGaoLThostensonET. An assessment of the science and technology of carbon nanotube-based fibers and composites. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70(1): 1–19.
43.
ClarksonBLPopeRJ. Experimental determination of modal densities and loss factors of flat plates and cylinders. J Sound Vibr1981; 77(4): 535 539.
44.
European Aviation Safety Agency. Certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for large airplane. CS-25, Annex to ED Decision 2011/004/R, 2011.
