Pilot–vehicle interaction represents a critical aspect of aircraft design. Very low-frequency, voluntary although unintentional interaction has been extensively investigated in fixed and rotary wing aeromechanics. Higher frequency, involuntary and thus passive interaction received similar attention in fixed wing aeromechanics, but not as much for rotary wing. The results of an experimental campaign for the characterization of the passive behaviour of rotorcraft pilots' biomechanics are presented. A flight simulator has been used to excite human subjects. The accelerations of their limbs and the motion induced by the vibrations of the limbs in the control inceptors have been recorded. The vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions have been independently excited, while measuring the motion of the arm directly involved in the control inceptor mostly affected by motion in each direction, namely the left and the right arms for the collective and the cyclic sticks, respectively. The frequency domain response has been evaluated; resulting noteworthy behaviour is discussed, addressing its relevance in modelling the passive behaviour of pilots within the bioaeroservoelastic rotorcraft analysis. The measurements of human body impedance, under realistic cockpit motion, are used to identify the direct transfer functions between the motion of the seat and the controls inadvertently fed back into the rotorcraft.
Harris FD, Kasper ED and Iseler L. US civil rotorcraft accidents, 1963 through 1997. Washington, DC: NASA, TM 2000-209597, December 2000, pp.220.
2.
MitchellDGKlydeDH. Recommended practices for exposing pilot-induced oscillations or tendencies in the development process. USAF developmental test and evaluation summit, Woodland Hills, CA16–18 November 2004, p.1–20, AIAA 2004-6810.
3.
WaldenRB. A retrospective survey of pilot-structural coupling instabilities in naval rotorcraft. 63rd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society1–3 May 2007, pp.1783–1800Virginia Beach, VA
4.
McRuerDT. Aviation safety and pilot control: understanding and preventing unfavourable pilot vehicle interactions. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press, 1997, pp.220–220.
5.
SkogestadSPostlethwaiteI. Multivariable feedback control. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
6.
AGARD. FVP workshop pilot induced oscillationsFebruary 1995, AGARD, AR 335.
7.
MitchellDGKlydeDH. Identifying a PIO signature—new techniques applied to an old problem. AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit. Keystone, CO, USA: AIAA-2006-6495, 21–24 August 2006.
8.
PavelMDMaleckiJDangVuB. Present and future trends in aircraft and rotorcraft pilot couplings—a retrospective survey of recent research activities within the European project ARISTOTEL. 37th ERF. Gallarate, Italy: Paper no. 116, 13–15 September 2011.
9.
DieterichOGötzJDangVuB. Adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling: Recent research activities in Europe. 34th European rotorcraft forum16–19 September 2008Liverpool, UK
10.
McRuerDTJexHR. A review of quasi-linear pilot models. Human Factors Electron IEEE Trans1967; HFE-8: 231–249.
11.
Mayo JR. The involuntary participation of a human pilot in a helicopter collective control loop. In: 15th European rotorcraft forum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 12–15 September 1989, pp.81.1–81.12.
12.
TischlerMBIvlerCMMansurMH. Handling-qualities optimization and trade-offs in rotorcraft flight control design. RAeS rotorcraft handling-qualities conference4–6 November 2008, pp.1–40Liverpool, UK
13.
Groot T, Damveld HJ, Mulder M, et al. Effects of aeroelasticity on the pilot's psychomotor behavior. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Keystone, CO, 21–24 August 2006, pp.1–24, AIAA 2006-6494.
14.
SmithJBerryDT. Analysis of longitudinal pilot–induced–oscillation tendencies on the YF-12 aircraft. Washington, DC: NASA1: TN D-7980, February 1975.
15.
NortonWJ. Aeroelastic pilot-in-the-loop oscillations. PIO Workshop following active control technology: applications and lessons learnedAGARD, May 1994Turin, Italy
16.
Iloputaife O. Minimizing pilot-induced-oscillation susceptibility during C-17 development. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, New Orleans, LA, 11–13 August 1997, pp.155–163, AIAA 1997–3497.
17.
DornheimMAHughesD. Boeing corrects several 777 PIOs. Aviation Week Space Technol1995; 142(19): 32–33.
18.
Venrooij J, Abbink DA, Mulder M, et al. Biodynamic feedthrough is task dependent. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems man and cybernetics (SMC), Istanbul, Turkey, 10–13 October 2010, pp.2571–2578.
19.
BilgerJMarrRZahediA. Results of structural dynamic testing of the XV-15 tilt rotor research aircraft. J Am Helicopter Soc1982; 27(2): 58–65.
20.
ParhamTJr.PopelkaD. V–22 pilot-in-the-loop aeroelastic stability analysis. 47th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society6–8 May 1991Phoenix, Arizona, USA
21.
ParhamTJr.CorsoLM. Aeroelastic and aeroservoelastic stability of the BA 609. 25th European rotorcraft forum14–16 September 1999Rome, Italy
22.
MasaratiPQuarantaGBassoW. Preliminary in-flight biomechanic tests on the BA-609 fly-by-wire tiltrotor. 21st SFTE EC Symposium3–6 October 2010Vergiate VA, Italy
23.
Anonymous. Über den Unfall des Hubschraubers Agusta Bell AB 204 B, HB-XKL. Technical Report 1980/19–1012, Eidgenössisches Verkehrs- und Energiewirtschafts departement. Bern: Eidg. Drucksachen- und Materialzentrale, June 1981.
24.
PadfieldGD. Helicopter flight dynamics: the theory and application of flying qualities and simulation modeling. Boston VA: AIAA: AIAA Education Series, 1996.
25.
Allen RW, Jex HR and Magdaleno RE. Manual control performance and dynamic response during sinusoidal vibration. TR 1013–2, STI, 1973; AMRL-TR-73-78. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, October 1973.
26.
JexHRMagdalenoRE. Biomechanical models for vibration feedthrough to hands and head for a semisupine pilot. Avia Space Environ Med1978; 491–2304–316.
27.
HöhneG. Computer aided development of biomechanical pilot models. Aerospace Sci Technol2000; 4: 57–69.
28.
JumpMHodgeSDangVuB. Adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling: the construction of the test campaigns at the university of Liverpool. 34th European rotorcraft forum16–19 September 2008; 2: 1572–1607Liverpool, UK
29.
GennarettiMSerafiniJMasaratiP. Aeroelastic and biodynamic modeling for stability analysis of rotorcraft-pilot coupling phenomena. 34th European rotorcraft forum16–19 September 2008Liverpool, UK
30.
PadfieldGDWhiteMD. Flight simulation in academia; HELIFLIGHT in its first year of operation. Aeronaut J Aeronaut Soc2003; 107: 529–538.
31.
KitazakiSGriffinMJ. A data correction method for surface measurement of vibration on the human body. J Biomech1995; 28: 885–890.
32.
Mattaboni M, Quaranta G, Masarati P, et al. Experimental identification of rotorcraft pilots' biodynamic response for investigation of PAO events. In: 35th European rotorcraft forum, ERF 2009. Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Luft und Raumfahrt (DGLR), Hamburg, Germany, 22–25 September 2009, pp.973–984.
33.
Advanced Rotorcraft Technology. FLIGHTLAB theory manual. Vol OneMountain View, CA: Advanced Rotorcraft Technology, March 2004.
34.
ShadmehrRArbibM. A mathematical analysis of the force-stiffness characteristics of muscles in control of a single joint system. Biol Cybernet1992; 66: 463–477.
35.
MasaratiPQuarantaGSerafiniJ. Numerical investigation of aeroservoelastic rotorcraft-pilot coupling. XIX Congresso Nazionale AIDAA17–21 September 2007, pp.1–13Forlì, Italy
36.
MasaratiPQuarantaGGennarettiM. Aeroservoelastic analysis of rotorcraftpilot coupling: a parametric study. 66th AHS Annual Forum11–13 May 2010Phoenix, Arizona
37.
McRuerDTKrendelES. Mathematical models of human pilot behavior. California 90250-7083: Paper no. 146, Systems Technology, Inc., 13766 S. Hawthorne Boulevard Hawthorne, January 1974, AGARD AG 188.
38.
HessRA. Theory for aircraft handling qualities based upon a structural pilot model. J Guid Control Dyn1989; 12(6): 792–797.
39.
MasaratiPQuarantaGGennarettiM. An investigation of aeroelastic rotorcraft-pilot interaction. 37th ERF. Gallarate, Italy: Paper no. 112, 13–15 September 2011.
40.
BlackmanRBTukeyJW. The measurement of power spectra from the point of view of communication engineering. New York: Dover Publications, 1958, pp.190–190.
41.
LeviEC. Complex-curve fitting. IRE Trans Autom Control1959; AC-4: 37–44.
