This survey of model-based fault diagnosis focuses on those methods that are applicable to aerospace systems. To highlight the characteristics of aerospace models, generic non-linear dynamical modelling from flight mechanics is recalled and a unifying representation of sensor and actuator faults is presented. An extensive bibliographical review supports a description of the key points of fault detection methods that rely on analytical redundancy. The approaches that best suit the constraints of the field are emphasized and recommendations for future developments in in-flight fault diagnosis are provided.
SchaeferR.Unmanned aerial vehicle reliability study, Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2003.
2.
JohnsonD. M.A review of fault management techniques used in safety-critical avionic systems. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 1996, 32(5), 415–431.
3.
Goupil, P. AIRBUS state of the art and practices on FDI and FTC. In Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Barcelona, Spain, 1–3 July 2009, pp. 564–572.
4.
Olive, X. FDI(R) for satellite at Thales Alenia Space: how to deal with high availability and robustness in Space domain? In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control and fault-tolerant systems, SysTol'10, Nice, France, 6–8 October 2010, pp. 837–842.
5.
BassevilleM.NikiforovI. V.Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application, NJ: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1993.
6.
PattonR. J.FrankP. M.Issues of fault diagnosis for dynamic systems., London: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
7.
GustafssonF.Adaptive filtering and change detection, London: Wiley, 2001.
8.
BlankeM.KinnaertM.LunzeJ.StaroswieckiM.Diagnosis and fault-tolerant control, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
9.
SimaniS.FantuzziC.PattonR. J.Model-based fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using identification techniques, London: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
10.
IsermannR.Fault-diagnosis systems: an introduction from fault detection to fault tolerance, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
11.
WitczakM.Modelling and estimation strategies for fault diagnosis of nonlinear systems: from analytical to soft computing approaches, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
WillskyA. S.A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems. Automatica, 1976, 12(6), 601–611.
14.
ChowE. Y.WillskyA. S.Analytical redundancy and the design of robust failure detection systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1984, 29(7), 603–614.
15.
IsermannR.Process fault detection based on modelling and estimation methods–a survey. Automatica, 1984, 20(4), 387–404.
16.
GertlerJ. J.Survey of model-based failure detection and isolation in complex plants. IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 1988, 8(6), 3–11.
17.
FrankP. M.Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy: A survey and some new results. Automatica, 1990, 26(3), 459–474.
18.
IsermannR.Supervision, fault-detection and fault-diagnosis methods : An introduction. Control Eng. Pract., 1997, 5(5), 639–652.
19.
BettaG.PietrosantoA.Instrument fault detection and isolation: State of the art and new research trends. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2000, 49(1), 100–107.
20.
VenkatasubramanianV.RengaswamyR.YinK.KavuriS. N.A review of process fault detection and diagnosis. Part I: Quantitative model-based methods. Comput. Chem. Engng, 2003, 27(3), 293–311.
21.
VenkatasubramanianV.RengaswamyR.KavuriS. N.A review of process fault detection and diagnosis. Part II: Qualitative models and search strategies. Comput. Chem. Engng, 2003, 27(3), 313–326.
22.
VenkatasubramanianV.RengaswamyR.KavuriS. N.YinK.A review of process fault detection and diagnosis. Part III: Process history based methods. Comput. Chem. Engng, 2003, 27(3), 327–346.
23.
Kinnaert, M. Fault diagnosis based on analytical models for linear and nonlinear systems–a tutorial. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Washington DC, USA, 9–11 June 2003, pp. 37–50.
24.
IsermannR.Model-based fault-detection and diagnosis–status and applications. Ann. Rev. Control, 2005, 29(1), 71–85.
25.
ZhangY.JiangJ.Bibliographical review on reconfigurable fault-tolerant control systems. Ann. Rev. Control, 2008, 32(2), 229–252.
26.
HwangI.KimS.KimY.SeahC. E.A survey of fault detection, isolation, and reconfiguration methods. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2010, 18(3), 636–653.
27.
Frank, P. M. Advanced fault diagnosis techniques in aerospace systems. In Proceedings of CompEuro '89. VLSI and Computer Peripherals, Hamburg, Germany, 8–12 May 1989, vol. 3, pp. 136–143.
28.
PattonR. J.Fault detection and diagnosis in aerospace systems using analytical redundancy. Comput. Control Engng J., 1991, 2(3), 127–136.
29.
PattonR. J.ChenJ.Review of parity space approaches to fault diagnosis for aerospace systems. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 1994, 17, 278–285.
30.
HajiyevC.CaliskanF.Fault diagnosis and reconfiguration in flight control systems, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
31.
Henry, D. From fault diagnosis to recovery actions for aeronautic and aerospace missions: a model-based point of view. In Proceedings of the 23rd IAR Workshop on Advanced control and diagnosis, Coventry, UK, 27–28 November 2008.
32.
EdwardsC.LombaertsT.SmailiH.Fault tolerant flight control: a benchmark challenge, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2010.
33.
MeskinN.KhorasaniK.Fault detection and isolation: multi-vehicle unmanned systems, 2011Springer, New York.
34.
ZolghadriA.The challenge of advanced model-based FDIR techniques for aerospace systems – the 2011 situation, 4–8 July 2011Proceedings of the 4th European Conference for Aero-Space Sciences, EUCASS 2011, St-Petersburg, Russia.
35.
IsermannR.BalleP.Trends in the application of model-based fault detection and diagnosis of technical processes. Control Eng. Pract., 1997, 5(5), 709–719.
36.
BartyśM.PattonR. J.SyfertM.de las HerasS.QuevedoJ.Introduction to the DAMADICS actuator FDI benchmark study. Control Eng. Pract., 2006, 14(6), 577–596.
37.
FrankP. M.Handling modelling uncertainty in fault detection and isolation systems. J. Control Engng Appl. Inform., 2002, 4(4), 29–46.
38.
SaifM.GuanY.A new approach to robust fault detection and identification. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1993, 29(3), 685–695.
39.
Chen, J., Patton, R. J., and Liu, G. P. Detecting incipient sensor faults in flight control systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Control applications, Glasgow, Scotland, 24–26 August 1994, vol. 2, pp. 871–876.
40.
MelodyJ. W.HillbrandT.BaarT.PerkinsW. R.ℋ∞parameter identification for in-flight detection of aircraft icing: the time-varying case. Control Eng. Pract., 2001, 9(12), 1327–1335.
41.
De Persis, C., De Santis, R., and Isidori, A. Nonlinear actuator fault detection and isolation for a VTOL aircraft. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Arlington, USA, 25–27 June 2001, vol. 6, pp. 4449–4454.
42.
Magrabi, S. M. and Gibbens, P. W. Decentralised fault detection and diagnosis in navigation systems for unmanned aerial vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE Position Location and Navigation Symposium, San Diego, USA, 24–26 April 2002, pp. 363–370.
43.
Miller, R. H. and Larsen, M. L. Optimal fault detection and isolation filters for flight vehicle performance monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, USA, 8–15 March 2003, vol. 7, pp. 3197–3203.
44.
ParkT. G.LeeK. S.Process fault isolation for linear systems with unknown inputs. IET Control Theory Applic., 2004, 151, 720–726.
45.
Kim, H. S., Park, S. K., Kim, Y., and Park, C. G. Hybrid fault detection and isolation method for UAV inertial sensor redundancy management system. In Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 3–8 July 2005, pp. 265–270.
46.
Mattei, M., and Paviglianiti, G. Managing sensor hardware redundancy on a small commercial aircraft with ℋ∞FDI observers. In Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 3–8 July 2005, pp. 347–352.
47.
Mattei, M., and Paviglianiti, G. Online approximators for the actuators FDI of a small commercial aircraft. In Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 3–8 July 2005, pp. 336–341.
48.
AmatoF.CosentinoC.MatteiM.PaviglianitiG.A direct/functional redundancy scheme for fault detection and isolation on an aircraft. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2006, 10(4), 338–345.
49.
BonfeM.CastaldiP.GeriW.SimaniS.Fault detection and isolation for on-board sensors of a general aviation aircraft. Int. J. Adaptive Control Signal Process., 2006, 20(8), 381–408.
50.
BoY.YongyuanQ.YanC.A method for fault detection and isolation in the integrated navigation system for UAV. Meas. Sci. Technol., 2006, 17(6), 1522–1528.
51.
RotsteinH. P.IngvalsonR.KeviczkyT.BalasG. J.Fault-detection design for uninhabited aerial vehicles. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2006, 29(5), 1051–1060.
52.
KimS.KimY.ParkC. G.JungI.Hybrid fault detection and isolation techniques for aircraft inertial measurement sensors. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci., 2006, 7(1), 73–83.
53.
SlegersN.CostelloM.Variable structure observer for control bias on unmanned air vehicles. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2007, 30(1), 281–286.
54.
Sharma, R. and Aldeen, M. Fault detection in nonlinear systems with unknown inputs using sliding mode observer. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, New York City, USA, 11–13 July 2007, pp. 432–437.
55.
BonfeM.CastaldiP.GeriW.SimaniS.Nonlinear actuator fault detection and isolation for a general aviation aircraft. Space Technol., 2007, 27(2–3), 107–114.
56.
Benini, M., Bonfe, M., Castaldi, P., Geri, W., and Simani, S. Fault diagnosis strategies for a simulated nonlinear aircraft model. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 6–11 July 2008, pp. 7300–7307.
57.
Bateman, F., Noura, H., and Ouladsine, M. Active fault detection and isolation strategy for an unmanned aerial vehicle with redundant flight control surfaces. In Proceedings of the 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and automation, Ajaccio, France, 25–27 June 2008, pp. 1246–1251.
58.
DucardG.GeeringH. P.Efficient nonlinear actuator fault detection and isolation system for unmanned aerial vehicles. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2008, 31(1), 225–237.
59.
CastaldiP.GeriW.BonfeM.SimaniS.BeniniM.Design of residual generators and adaptive filters for the FDI of aircraft model sensors. Control Eng. Pract., 2010, 18(5), 449–459.
60.
SamyI.PostlethwaiteI.GuD. W.Sensor fault detection and accommodation using neural networks with application to a nonlinear unmanned air vehicle model. Proc. IMechE, Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering, 2010, 224(4), 437–447.
61.
DimogianopoulosD.HiosJ.FassoisS.Aircraft engine health management via stochastic modelling of flight data interrelations. Aerosp. Sci. Technol.,, 2011in press DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2011.03.002.
62.
DrozeskiG. R.SahaB.VachtsevanosG. J.A fault detection and reconfigurable control architecture for unmanned aerial vehicles, 5–12 March 2005Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, USA, pp. 1–9.
63.
Rafaralahy, H., Richard, E., Boutayeb, M., and Zasadzinski, M. Simultaneous observer based sensor diagnosis and speed estimation of unmanned aerial vehicle. In Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and control, 9–11 December 2008, pp. 2938–2943.
64.
BerbraC.GentilS.LesecqS.Identification of multiple faults in an inertial measurement unit, 19–20 November 2009Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Advanced control and diagnosis ACD'2009, Zielona Gora, Poland.
65.
ZhangN.FernandezJ. L. L.DoncescuA.Mora-CaminoF.Rotorcraft fault detection using difference flatness, 10–13 August 2009Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Chicago, USA.
66.
FreddiA.LonghiS.MonteriuA.A model-based fault diagnosis system for unmanned aerial vehicles, 1–3 July 2009Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 71–76.
67.
Nguyen, H. V., Berbra, C., Lesecq, S., Gentil, S., Barraud, A., and Godin, C. Diagnosis of an inertial measurement unit based on set membership estimation. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and automation, Thessaloniki, Greece, 24–26 June 2009, pp. 211–216.
68.
RagC.PrasanthR.MehraR. K.FortenbaughR.Failure detection and identification and fault tolerant control using the IMM-KF with applications to the eagle-eye UAV, 16–18 December 1998Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and control, Tampa, USA, pp. 4208–4213.
69.
OzaN.TumerK.TumerI.HuffE.Classification of aircraft maneuvers for fault detection. In: WindeattT.RoliF. (eds). Multiple classifier systems, 2003, Vol. 2709 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 375–384.
70.
Samar, S., Gorinevsky, D., and Boyd, S. P. Embedded estimation of fault parameters in an unmanned aerial vehicle. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control applications, Munich, Germany, 4–6 October 2006, pp. 3265–3270.
71.
Achour, W., Piet-Lahanier, H., and Siguerdidjane, H. Bounded error identification of the wind gusts effect on a small scaled helicopter. In Proceedings of the IFAC Workshop on Aerospace guidance, navigation and flight control systems, Samara, Russia, 30 June–2 July 2009.
72.
HerediaG.OlleroA.BejarM.MahtaniR.Sensor and actuator fault detection in small autonomous helicopters. Mechatronics, 2008, 18(2), 90–99.
Schutte, P. C., Abbott, K. H., Palmer, M. T., and Ricks, W. R.. An evaluation of a real-time fault diagnosis expert system for aircraft applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and control, Los Angeles, USA, 9–11 December 1987, vol. 26, pp. 1941–1947.
75.
NapolitanoM. R.AnY.SeanorB. A.A fault tolerant flight control system for sensor and actuator failures using neural networks. Aircraft Des., 2000, 3(2), 103–128.
76.
WuN. E.ZhouK.SalomonG.Control reconfigurability of linear time-invariant systems. Automatica, 2000, 36(11), 1767–1771.
77.
ZolghadriA.GoetzC.BergeonB.DenoizeX.Integrity monitoring of flight parameters using analytical redundancy, UK, 10–12 September 2002Proceedings of the UKACC International Conference on Control, Sheffield, pp. 1534–1539.
78.
SzasziI.KulcsarB.BalasG. J.BokorJ.Design of FDI filter for an aircraft control system, USA, 8–10 May 2002Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Anchorage, pp. 4232–4237.
79.
WilbersD. M.SpeyerJ. L.Detection filters for aircraft sensor and actuator faults, Israel, 3–6 April 1989Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control and applications, Jerusalem, pp. 81–86.
80.
GlavaskiS.ElgersmaM.DorneichM.LommelP.Failure accommodating aircraft control, USA, 8–10 May 2002Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 5, Anchorage, pp. 3624–3630.
81.
GlavaskiS.ElgersmaM.Active aircraft fault detection and isolation, USA, 21–24 October 2002Proceedings of IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference AUTOTESTCON, Valley Forge, pp. 692–705.
SzasziI.MarcosA.BalasG. J.BokorJ.Linear parameter-varying detection filter design for a Boeing 747-100/200 aircraft. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2005, 28(3), 461–470.
84.
MarcosA.GanguliS.BalasG. J.An application of ℋ∞fault detection and isolation to a transport aircraft. Control Eng. Pract., 2005, 13(1), 105–119.
85.
AzamM.PattipatiK.AllanachJ.PollS.Patterson-HineA.In-flight fault detection and isolation in aircraft flight control systems, USA, 5–12 March 2005Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky.
86.
Alwi, H. and Edwards, C. Robust sensor fault estimation for tolerant control of a civil aircraft using sliding modes. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Minneapolis, USA, 14–16 June 2006, pp. 5704–5709.
87.
Fekih, A., Xu, H., and Chowdhury, F. N. Two neural net-learning methods for model based fault detection. In Proceedings of the 6th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection supervision and safety for technical processes, Beijing, 30 August–1 September 2006, pp. 72–77.
88.
Liu, J., Jiang, B., and Zhang, Y. Sliding mode observer-based fault detection and isolation in flight control systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control and applications, Singapore, 1–3 October 2007, pp. 1049–1054.
89.
Ribot, P., Jauberthie, C., and Travé-Massuyes, L. State estimation by interval analysis for a nonlinear differential aerospace model. In Proceedings of the IEEE European Control Conference, Kos, Greece, 2–5 July 2007, pp. 4839–4844.
90.
Meskin, N., Jiang, T., Sobhani, E., Khorasani, K., and Rabbath, C. A. Nonlinear geometric approach to fault detection and isolation in an aircraft nonlinear longitudinal model. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, New York City, USA, 11–13 July 2007, pp. 5771–5776.
91.
RauschR. T.GoebelK. F.EklundN. H.BrunellB. J.Integrated in-flight fault detection and accommodation: a model-based study. J. Engng Gas Turb. Power, 2007, 129(4), 962–969.
92.
YinW.ZhangW. G.SunX.A SVM-based multiple faults classification scheme design in flight control FDI system, Japan, 5–7 September 2007Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovative computing information and control, Kumamoto, pp. 187–191.
93.
ChengQ.VarshneyP. K.MichelsJ. H.BelcastroC. M.Fault detection in dynamic systems via decision fusion. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2008, 44(1), 227–227.
94.
SamaraP. A.FouskitakisG. N.SakellariouJ. S.FassoisS. D.A statistical method for the detection of sensor abrupt faults in aircraft control systems. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2008, 16(4), 789–798.
95.
TrendafilovaI.CartmellM. P.OstachowiczW.Vibration-based damage detection in an aircraft wing scaled model using principal component analysis and pattern recognition. J. Sound Vibration, 2008, 313(3–5), 560–566.
96.
ZhouJ.HuangX.Application of a new fault detection approach to aerocraft's closed-loop control system. Intell. Robot. Appl., 2008, pp. 1223–1232.
97.
Varga, A. Monitoring actuator failures for a large transport aircraft – the nominal case. In Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Barcelona, Spain, 1–3 July 2009, pp. 627–632.
98.
BorguetS.LeonardO.Coupling principal component analysis and Kalman filtering algorithms for on-line aircraft engine diagnostics. Control Pract. Engng, 2009, 17(4), 494–502.
99.
Smith, T. A., Nielsen, Z. A., Reichenbach, E. Y., and Sr, J. M. U. Dynamic structural fault detection and identification. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Chicago, USA, 10–13 August 2009.
100.
AlwiH.EdwardsC.StroosmaO.MulderJ.Evaluation of a sliding mode fault-tolerant controller for the El Al incident. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2010, 33(3), 677–694.
101.
Rosa, P., Silvestre, C., Shamma, J. S., and Athans, M. Fault detection and isolation of an aircraft using set-valued observers. In Proceedings of the 18th IFAC Symposium on Automatic control in aerospace, Nara, Japan, 6–10 September 2010.
102.
HardierG.BucharlesA.On-line parameter identification for in-flight aircraft monitoring, 2010Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Nice, France.
103.
JayakumarM.DasB. B.Isolating incipient sensor faults and system reconfiguration in a flight control actuation system. Proc. IMechE, Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering, 2010, 224(1), 101–111.
104.
GoupilP.Oscillatory failure case detection in the A380 electrical flight control system by analytical redundancy. Control Eng. Pract., 2010, 18(9), 1110–1119.
105.
DöllC.HardierG.VargaA.KappenbergerC.IMMUNE project : an overview, Japan, 6–10 September 2010Proceedings of the 18th IFAC Symposium on Automatic control in aerospace, Nara.
106.
Berdjag, D., Zolghadri, A., Cieslak, J., and Goupil, P. Fault detection and isolation for redundant aircraft sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control and fault-tolerant systems, SysTol’10, Nice, France, 6–8 October 2010, pp. 137–142.
107.
EfimovD.ZolghadriA.RaïssiT.Actuator fault detection and compensation under feedback control. Automatica, 2011, 47(8), 1699–1705in press.
108.
EideP. K.MaybeckP. S.An MMAE failure detection system for the F-16. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1996, 32(3), 1125–1136.
109.
Monaco, J., Ward, D., Barron, R., and Bird, R. Implementation and flight test assessment of an adaptive, reconfigurable flight control system. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, New Orleans, Louissiana LA, 11–13 August 1997, pp. 97–3738.
110.
HajiyevC.CaliskanF.Sensor/actuator fault diagnosis based on statistical analysis of innovation sequence and robust Kalman filtering. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2000, 4(6), 415–422.
111.
CaliskanF.HajiyevC. M.Innovation sequence application to aircraft sensor fault detection: comparison of checking covariance matrix algorithms. ISA Trans., 2000, 39(1), 47–56.
112.
ChenY. M.LeeM. L.Neural networks-based scheme for system failure detection and diagnosis. Math. Comput. Simul., 2002, 58(2), 101–109.
113.
MenkeT. E.MaybeckP. S.Sensor/actuator failure detection in the Vista F-16 by multiple model adaptive estimation. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2002, 31(4), 1218–1229.
114.
ChenR. H.SpeyerJ. L.Sensor and actuator fault reconstruction. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2004, 27(2), 186–196.
115.
Hagenblad, A., Gustafsson, F., and Klein, I. A comparison of two methods for stochastic fault detection: the parity space approach and principal component analysis. In Proceedings of 13th IFAC Symposium on System identification 2003, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 27–29 August 2003.
116.
ChenB.NagarajaiahS.Linear-matrix-inequality-based robust fault detection and isolation using the eigenstructure assignment method. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2007, 30(6), 1831–1835.
117.
WangD.LumK. Y.Adaptive unknown input observer approach for aircraft actuator fault detection and isolation. Int. J. Adaptive Control Signal Process., 2007, 21(1), 31–48.
118.
KimS.ChoiJ.Fault detection and diagnosis of aircraft actuators using fuzzy-tuning IMM filter. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2008, 44(3), 940–952.
119.
FravoliniM. L.BrunoriV.CampaG.NapolitanoM. R.CavaM. L.Structural analysis approach for the generation of structured residuals for aircraft FDI. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2010, 45(4), 1466–1482.
120.
BurchamF. W.MaineT. A.FullertonC. G.Development and flight evaluation of an emergency digital flight control system using only engine thrust on an F-15 airplane, 1996NASA, TP-3627.
121.
OstroffA. J.BaconB. J.Force and moment approach for achievable dynamics using nonlinear dynamic inversion, Oregon, 9–12 August 1999AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Portland, pp. 424–434.
122.
Ostroff, A. J. and Bacon, B. J. Reconfigurable flight control using nonlinear dynamic inversion with a special accelerometer implementation. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Denver, USA, 14–17 August 2000.
123.
ZhangY.LiX. R.Detection and diagnosis of sensor and actuator failures using IMM estimator. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1998, 34(4), 1293–1313.
124.
Scholte, E. and Campbell, M. E. On-line nonlinear guaranteed estimation with application to a high performance aircraft. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Anchorage, USA, 8–10 May 2002, pp. 184–190.
125.
BoskovicJ. D.BergstromS. E.MehraR. K.CoS. S.WoburnM. A.Retrofit reconfigurable flight control in the presence of control effector damage, USA, 8–10 June 2005Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Portland, pp. 2652–2657.
126.
Benitez-PérezH.Garcia-NocettiF.ThompsonH.Fault classification based upon self organizing feature maps and dynamic principal component analysis for inertial sensor drift. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inform. Control, 2007, 3(2), 257–276.
127.
YanX. G.EdwardsC.Robust sliding mode observer-based actuator fault detection and isolation for a class of nonlinear systems. Int. J. Syst. Sci., 2008, 39(4), 349–359.
128.
FravoliniM. L.CampaG.Design of robust redundancy relations for a semi-scale YF-22 aircraft model. Control Eng. Pract., 2009, 17(7), 773–786.
129.
Kerr, M. L., Marcos, A., Penin, L. F., Briege, O., Postlethwaite, I., and Turner, M. Piloted assessment of a fault diagnosis algorithm on the ATTAS aircraft. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Chicago, USA, 10–13 August 2009.
130.
ChenW. H.Nonlinear disturbance observer-enhanced dynamic inversion control of missiles. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2003, 26(1), 161–166.
131.
XuD.WuM.AnJ.Design of an expert system based on neural network ensembles for missile fault diagnosis, USA, 8–13 October 2003Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics, intelligent systems and signal processing, vol. 2, Las Vegas, pp. 903–908.
132.
HalderP.ChaudhuriS. K.MukhopadhyayS.On line sensor fault detection, isolation and accommodation in tactical aerospace vehicle, Thailand, 24 November 2004Proceedings of the IEEE TENCON, Chiang Mai, pp. 684–686.
133.
YuC.HanH. X.MinW.Missile fault detection based on linear parameter varying fault detection filter. Inform. Technol. J., 2009, 8(3), 340–346.
134.
MarzatJ.Piet-LahanierH.DamongeotF.WalterE.A new model–free method performing closed-loop fault diagnosis for an aeronautical system, Poland, 19–20 November 2009Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Advanced control and diagnosis, ACD'2009, Zielona Gora.
135.
MarzatJ.Piet-LahanierH.DamongeotF.WalterE.Nonlinear FDI based on state derivatives, as provided by inertial measurement units, Italy, 1–3 September 2010Proceedings of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear control systems, Bologna, pp. 951–956.
136.
MarzatJ.Piet-LahanierH.DamongeotF.WalterE.Fault diagnosis for nonlinear aircraft based on control-induced redundancy, France, 6–8 October 2010Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control and fault-tolerant systems, SysTol'10, Nice, pp. 119–124.
137.
WhiteheadB.KiechE.AliM.Rocket engine diagnostics using neural networks, 16–18 July 1990Proceedings of the 26 th Joint Propulsion Conference, Orlando.
138.
AgustinR. M.MangoubiR. S.HainR. M.AdamsN. J.Robust failure detection for reentry vehicle attitude control systems. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 1999, 22(6), 839–845.
139.
Gorinevsky, D., Samar, S., Bain, J., and Aaseng, G. Integrated diagnostics of rocket flight control. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, USA, 5–12 March 2005, pp. 3831–3842.
140.
EllsworthJ. C.WhitmoreS. A.Reentry air data system for a sub-orbital spacecraft based on X-34 design, USA, 8–11 January 2007Proccedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, Reno.
141.
BartaC.MelendezJ.ColomerJ.Off line diagnosis of Ariane flights using PCA. Space Technol., 2007, 27(2–3), 99–106.
142.
FalcozA.HenryD.ZolghadriA.A nonlinear fault identification scheme for reusable launch vehicles control surfaces. Int. Rev. Aerosp. Engng, 2008, 1(6), 492–503.
143.
FalcozA.HenryD.ZolghadriA.Robust fault diagnosis for atmospheric reentry vehicles: a case study. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part A: Syst. Humans, 2010, 40(5), 886–899.
144.
MehraR.RagoC.SeereeramS.Autonomous failure detection, identification and fault-tolerant estimation with aerospace applications, USA, 21–28 March 1998Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Aerospace Conference, vol. 2, Snowmass, pp. 133–138.
145.
Fujimaki, R., Yairi, T., and Machida, K. An approach to spacecraft anomaly detection problem using kernel feature space. Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining, 21–24 August 2005, pp. 401–410.
146.
ZhangQ.CampilloF.CerouF.LeglandF.Nonlinear system fault detection and isolation based on bootstrap particle filters, Spain, 12–15 December 2005Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and control and European control conference, Seville, pp. 3821–3826.
147.
XiongK.ChanC. W.ZhangH. Y.Detection of satellite attitude sensor faults using the UKF. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2007, 43(2), 480–491.
148.
WilliamsonW. R.SpeyerJ. L.DangV. T.SharpJ.Fault detection for deep space satellites. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2009, 32(5), 1570–1584.
149.
JiangT.KhorasaniK.TafazoliS.Parameter estimation-based fault detection, isolation and recovery for nonlinear satellite models. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2008, 16(4), 799–808.
150.
HenryD.Fault diagnosis of microscope satellite thrusters using ℋ∞/ℋ−filters. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2008, 31(3).
151.
TudoroiuN.KhorasaniK.Satellite fault diagnosis using a bank of interacting Kalman filters. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2008, 43(4), 1334–1350.
152.
TalebiH. A.KhorasaniK.TafazoliS.A recurrent neural-network-based sensor and actuator fault detection and isolation for nonlinear systems with application to the satellite's attitude control subsystem. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks., 2009, 20(1), 45–60.
153.
Patton, R. J., Uppal, F. J., Simani, S., and Polle, B. Robust FDI applied to thruster faults of a satellite system. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC Symposium on Automatic control and aerospace, Toulouse, France, 25–29 June 2007.
154.
HenryD.SimaniS.PattonR. J.Fault detection and diagnosis for aeronautic and aerospace missions. In: EdwardsC.LombaertsT.SmailiH. (eds). Fault tolerant flight control, 2010, Vol. 399 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 91–128.
155.
Baldi, P., Castaldi, P., Simani, S., and Bertoni, G. Fault diagnosis and control reconfiguration for satellite reaction wheels. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control and fault-tolerant systems, SysTol'10, Nice, France, 6–8 October 2010, pp. 143–146.
156.
Alwi, H., Edwards, C., and Marcos, A. FDI for a Mars orbiting satellite based on a sliding mode observer scheme. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control and fault-tolerant systems, SysTol'10, Nice, France, 6–8 October 2010.
157.
HullD. G.Fundamentals of airplane flight mechanics, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
158.
StengelR. F.Flight dynamics, 2004Princeton University Press.
159.
StevensB. L.LewisF. L.Aircraft control and simulation, New York: Wiley, 2003.
160.
EtkinB.ReidL. D.Dynamics of flight: stability and control, New York: Wiley, 1996.
161.
IsidoriA.Nonlinear control systems: an introduction, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
162.
Board USNTS. Aircraft Accident Report: American Airlines, Inc., DC-10-10, N110AA, Chicago-O'Hare International Airport, Chicago, IL, May 25 1979. National Transportation Safety Board, USA.
163.
Maciejowski, J. M. and Jones, C. N. MPC fault-tolerant flight control case study: Flight 1862. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Washington D.C., 9–11 June USA 2003.
164.
ReveleyM. S.BriggsJ. L.EvansJ. K.JonesS. M.KurtogluT.LeoneK. M.. Commercial aircraft integrated vehicle health management study, 2010NASA, TM-215808.
165.
LawrenceA.Modern inertial technology: navigation, guidance, and control, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
MerhavS.Aerospace sensor systems and applications, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
168.
BalabanE.SaxenaA.BansalP.GoebelK. F.CurranS.Modelling, detection, and disambiguation of sensor Faults for aerospace applications. IEEE Sensors J., 2009, 9(12), 1907–1917.
169.
StengelR. F.HandelmanD.Combining expert system and analytical redundancy concepts for fault-tolerant flight control. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 1989, 12, 39–45.
170.
MarzatJ.Piet-LahanierH.DamongeotF.WalterE.Control-based fault detection and isolation for autonomous aircraft. Proc. IMechE, Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering, 2011in press.
171.
AngeliC.ChatzinikolaouA.On-line fault detection techniques for technical system: a survey. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl., 2004, 1(1), 12–30.
172.
MauryaM. R.RengaswamyR.VenkatasubramanianV.Fault diagnosis using dynamic trend analysis: a review and recent developments. Engng Appl. Artif. Intel., 2007, 20(2), 133–146.
173.
PanatiA.DupréD. T.Causal Simulation and Diagnosis of Dynamic Systems. In: EspositoF. (ed.) AI*IA 2001: Advances in artificial intelligence, 2001, Vol. 2175 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 135–146.
174.
MontmainJ.GentilS.Dynamic causal model diagnostic reasoning for online technical process supervision. Automatica, 2000, 36(8), 1137–1152.
175.
PattonR. J.Lopez-ToribioC. J.UppalF. J.Artificial intelligence approaches to fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 1999, 9(3), 471–518.
176.
ShinH. J.EomD. H.KimS. S.One-class support vector machines: an application in machine fault detection and classification. Comput. Ind. Engng, 2005, 48(2), 395–408.
177.
MahadevanS.ShahS. L.Fault detection and diagnosis in process data using one-class support vector machines. J. Process Control, 2009, 19(10), 1627–1639.
178.
ChandolaV.BanerjeeA.KumarV.Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM Comput. Surveys, 2009, 41(3), 1–58.
179.
JainA. K.DuinR. P. W.MaoJ.Statistical pattern recognition: a review. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel., 2000, 22(1), 4–37.
180.
ZhangG. P.Neural networks for classification: a survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part C: Applic. Rev., 2000, 30(4), 451–462.
181.
SorsaT.KoivoH. N.KoivistoH.Neural networks in process fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet., 1991, 21(4), 815–825.
182.
Patton, R. J., Chen, J., and Siew, T. M. Fault diagnosis in nonlinear dynamic systems via neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Control, vol. 2, Coventry, UK, 21–24 March 1994, pp. 1346–1351.
183.
FrankP. M.Köppen-SeligerB.Fuzzy logic and neural network applications to fault diagnosis. Int. J. Approx. Reason., 1997, 16(1), 67–88.
184.
MarkouM.SinghS.Novelty detection: a review – Part 1. Statistical approaches. Signal Process., 2003, 83(12), 2481–2497.
185.
GunnS. R.Support vector machines for classification and regression. Image Speech and Intelligent Systems Research Group, University of Southampton, 1998ISIS technical report.
186.
GyörfiL.Principles of nonparametric learning, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
RasmussenC. E.WilliamsC. K. I.Gaussian processes for machine learning, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
189.
GeM.DuR.ZhangG.XuY.Fault diagnosis using support vector machine with an application in sheet metal stamping operations. Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2004, 18(1), 143–159.
190.
DavyM.DesobryF.GrettonA.DoncarliC.An online support vector machine for abnormal events detection. Signal Process., 2006, 86(8), 2009–2025.
191.
SaadawiaM.SöffkerD.SVM-based fault diagnosis system for materials change detection, 19–20 November 2009Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Advanced control and diagnosis, Zielona Gora, Poland.
MarkouM.SinghS.Novelty detection: a review – Part 2. Neural network based approaches. Signal Process., 2003, 83(12), 2499–2521.
194.
AlcalaC. F.QinS. J.Unified analysis of diagnosis methods for process monitoring, 1–3 July 2009Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1007–1012.
195.
HarkatM. F.MourotG.RagotJ.An improved PCA scheme for sensor FDI: application to an air quality monitoring network. J. Process Control, 2006, 16(6), 625–634.
196.
TharraultY.MourotG.RagotJ.MaquinD.Fault detection and isolation with robust principal component analysis. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2008, 18(4), 429–442.
197.
LeeJ. M.YooC. K.ChoiS. W.VanrolleghemP. A.LeeI. B.Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis. Chem. Engng Sci., 2004, 59(1), 223–234.
198.
LeeJ. M.YooC. K.LeeI. B.Statistical process monitoring with independent component analysis. J. Process Control, 2004, 14(5), 467–485.
199.
LiW.YueH. H.Valle-CervantesS.QinS. J.Recursive PCA for adaptive process monitoring. J. Process Control., 2000, 10(5), 471–486.
200.
WangX.KrugerU.LennoxB.Recursive partial least squares algorithms for monitoring complex industrial processes. Control Eng. Pract., 2003, 11(6), 613–632.
201.
WalterE.PronzatoL.On the identifiability and distinguishability of nonlinear parametric models. Math. Comput. Simul., 1996, 42(2-3), 125–134.
202.
IsermannR.Fault diagnosis of machines via parameter estimation and knowledge processing–Tutorial paper. Automatica, 1993, 29(4), 815–835.
203.
DelmaireG.CassarJ. P.StaroswieckiM.Identification and parity space techniques for failure detection in SISO systems including modelling errors, USA, 14–16 December 1994Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and control, vol. 3, Lake Buena Vista, pp. 2279–2285.
204.
BlochG.OuladsineM.ThomasP.On-line fault diagnosis of dynamic systems via robust parameter estimation. Control Eng. Pract., 1995, 3(12), 1709–1717.
205.
DoraiswamiR.StevensonM.A robust influence matrix approach to fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 1996, 4(1), 29–39.
206.
WalterE.PronzatoL.Identification of parametric models from experimental data, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
SimpsonT. W.PoplinskiJ. D.KochP. N.AllenJ. K.Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng. Comput., 2001, 17(2), 129–150.
209.
VillemonteixJ.VazquezE.WalterE.Bayesian optimization for parameter identification on a small simulation budget, 6–8 July 2009Proceedings of the 15th IFAC Symposium on System identification, SYSID 2009, Saint-Malo, France, pp. 1603–1608.
PekpeK. M.MourotG.RagotJ.Subspace method for sensor fault detection and isolation-application to grinding circuit monitoring, 22–24 May 2006Proceedings of the 11th IFAC Symposium on Automation in mining, mineral and metal processing, Nancy, France, pp. 47–52.
212.
PuigV.Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control using set-membership approaches: application to real case studies. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2010, 20(4), 619–635.
213.
KiefferM.WalterE.Guaranteed estimation of the parameters of nonlinear continuous-time models: contributions of interval analysis. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., 2011, 25(3), 191–207.
214.
CastilloS. M.GelsoE. R.ArmengolJ.Constraint satisfaction techniques under uncertain conditions for fault diagnosis in nonlinear dynamic systems, 1–3 September 2008Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and automation, Ajaccio, France, pp. 1216–1221.
215.
IngimundarsonA.BravoJ. M.PuigV.AlamoT.GuerraP.Robust fault detection using zonotope-based set-membership consistency test. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., 2009, 23(4), 311–330.
216.
ReppaV.TzesA.Fault detection and diagnosis based on parameter set estimation. IET Control Theory Applic., 2011, 5(1), 69–83.
217.
BeardR. V.Failure accommodation in linear systems through self-reorganization. PhD Thesis, Cambridge, MA: Department of Aeronautics Astronautics, MIT, 1971.
218.
JonesH. L.Failure detection in linear systems. PhD Thesis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Deptartment Aeronautics Astronautics, MIT, 1973.
PattonR. J.ChenJ.Observer-based fault detection and isolation: robustness and applications. Control Eng. Pract., 1997, 5(5), 671–682.
221.
Alcorta GarciaE.FrankP. M.Deterministic nonlinear observer-based approaches to fault diagnosis: a survey. Control Eng. Pract., 1997, 5(5), 663–670.
222.
FrankP. M.DingX.Survey of robust residual generation and evaluation methods in observer-based fault detection systems. J. Process Control, 1997, 7(6), 403–424.
223.
ZeitzM.The extended Luenberger observer for nonlinear systems. Syst. Control Lett., 1987, 9(2), 149–156.
224.
Nejjari, F., Puig, V., Giancristofaro, L., and Koehler, S. Extended Luenberger observer-based fault detection for an activated sludge process. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Korea, 6–11 July 2008, pp. 9725–9730.
225.
AdjallahK.MaquinD.RagotJ.Nonlinear observer-based fault detection, 24–26 August 1994Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Control applications, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 1115–1120.
226.
ChenW.SaifM.SohY.A variable structure adaptive observer approach for actuator fault detection and diagnosis in uncertain nonlinear systems, 28–30 June 2000Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 4, Chicago, USA, pp. 2674–2678.
227.
XuA.ZhangQ.Nonlinear system fault diagnosis based on adaptive estimation. Automatica, 2004, 40(7), 1181–1193.
228.
LiZ.DahhouB.An observers based fault isolation approach for nonlinear dynamic systems, 13–15 March 2006Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Communications, control and signal processing, Marrakech, Morocco.
229.
ZhangX.PolycarpouM. M.ParisiniT.Fault diagnosis of a class of nonlinear uncertain systems with Lipschitz nonlinearities using adaptive estimation. Automatica, 2010, 46(2), 290–299.
230.
HammouriH.KinnaertM.YaagoubiE. H. E. Observer-based approach to fault detection and isolation for nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1999, 44(10), 1879–1884.
231.
BusvelleE.GauthierJ. P.High-gain and non high-gain observers for nonlinear systems. Contemp. Trends Nonlinear Geomet. Control Theory, 2002, pp. 257–286.
232.
BesançonG.High-gain observation with disturbance attenuation and application to robust fault detection. Automatica, 2003, 39(6), 1095–1102.
233.
AndrieuV.PralyL.On the existence of a Kazantzis-Kravaris/Luenberger observer. SIAM J. Control Optim., 2006, 45(2), 432–456.
234.
Andrieu, V. Exponential convergence of nonlinear Luenberger observers. In Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlanta, USA, 15–17 December 2010, pp. 2163–2168.
235.
EdwardsC.SpurgeonS. K.PattonR. J.Sliding mode observers for fault detection and isolation. Automatica, 2000, 36(4), 541–553.
236.
TanC. P.EdwardsC.Sliding mode observers for robust detection and reconstruction of actuator and sensor faults. Int. J. Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2003, 13(5), 443–463.
237.
JiangB.StaroswieckiM.CocquempotV.Fault estimation in nonlinear uncertain systems using robust/sliding-mode observers. IEE Proc. Control Theory and Applic., 2004, 151(1), 29–37.
238.
TakagiT.SugenoM.Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modelling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet., 1985, 15, 116–132.
239.
IchtevA.HellendoornJ.BabuskaR.Fault detection and isolation using multiple Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models, 2–5 December 2001Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy systems, vol. 3, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 1498–1502.
240.
IchalalD.MarxB.RagotJ.MaquinD.Fault diagnosis for Takagi-Sugeno nonlinear systems, 1–3 July 2009Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 504–509.
241.
KalmanR. E.A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J. Basic Engng, 1960, 82(1), 35–45.
242.
MehraR. K.PeschonJ.An innovations approach to fault detection and diagnosis in dynamic systems. Automatica, 1971, 7(5), 637–640.
243.
Willsky, A. Detection of abrupt changes in dynamic systems. In Detection of abrupt changes in signals and dynamical systems vol. 77 (Eds M. Basseville, A. Benveniste), 1986, pp. 27–49 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
244.
NikoukhahR.Innovations generation in the presence of unknown inputs: application to robust failure detection. Automatica, 1994, 30(12), 1851–1867.
245.
ZolghadriA.An algorithm for real-time failure detection in Kalman filters. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1996, 41(10), 1537–1539.
246.
HanlonP. D.MaybeckP. S.Multiple-model adaptive estimation using a residual correlation Kalman filter bank. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2000, 36(2), 393–406.
247.
BlomH. A. P.Bar-ShalomY.The interacting multiple model algorithm for systems with Markovian switching coefficients. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1988, 33(8), 780–783.
248.
RuJ.LiR.Interacting multiple model algorithm with maximum likelihood estimation for FDI, 5–8 October 2003Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent control, Houston, USA, pp. 661–666.
249.
HocineA.MaquinD.RagotJ.Finite memory observer for switching systems: Application to diagnosis, 3–8 July 2005Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 406–411.
JulierS. J.UhlmannJ. K.Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proc. IEEE, 2004, 92(3), 401–422.
252.
CorkL.WalkerR.Sensor fault detection for UAVs using a nonlinear dynamic model and the IMM-UKF algorithm, 12–14 February 2007Proceedings of the Conference on Information, decision and control, Adelaide, Queensland, pp. 230–235.
253.
XiongK.ChanC. W.ZhangH. Y.Unscented Kalman filter for fault detection, 3–8 July 2005Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 113–118.
254.
AndrieuC.DoucetA.SinghS. S.TadicV. B.Particle methods for change detection, system identification, and control. Proc. IEEE, 2004, 92(3), 423–438.
255.
LiP.KadirkamanathanV.Particle filtering based likelihood ratio approach to fault diagnosis in nonlinear stochastic systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part C Applic. Rev., 2001, 31(3), 337–343.
WangX.SyrmosV. L.Interacting multiple particle filters for fault diagnosis of nonlinear stochastic systems, 11–13 June 2008Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, USA, pp. 4274–4279.
258.
RaïssiT.VideauG.ZolghadriA.Interval observer design for consistency checks of nonlinear continuous-time systems. Automatica, 2010, 46(3), 518–527.
259.
PuigV.QuevedoJ.EscobetT.NejjariF.de las HerasS.Passive robust fault detection of dynamic processes using interval models. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2008, 16(5), 1083–1089.
260.
PattonR. J.ChenJ.A review of parity space approaches to fault diagnosis, 10–13 September 1991Proceedings of the 1st IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Baden-Baden, Germany, pp. 65–81.
PattonR. J.ChenJ.Robust fault detection using eigenstructure assignment: a tutorial consideration and some new results, 11–12 December 1991Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and control, Brighton, pp. 2242–2247.
263.
MagniJ. F.MouyonP.On residual generation by observer and parity space approaches. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1994, 39(2), 441–447.
264.
GertlerJ. J.All linear methods are equal – and extendible to (some) nonlinearities. International J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2002, 12(8), 629–648.
265.
MaquinD.CocquempotV.CassarJ. P.StaroswieckiM.RagotJ.Generation of analytical redundancy relations for FDI purposes, September 1997IEEE Symposium on Diagnostics for electrical machines, power electronics and drive, SDEMPED’97, Carry-le Rouet, France, pp. 270–276.
266.
MedvedevA.Fault detection and isolation by a continuous parity space method. Automatica, 1995, 31(7), 1039–1044.
267.
StaroswieckiM.Comtet-VargaG.Analytical redundancy relations for fault detection and isolation in algebraic dynamic systems. Automatica, 2001, 37(5), 687–699.
268.
ShumskyA.Redundancy relations for fault diagnosis in nonlinear uncertain systems. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2007, 17(4), 477–489.
269.
HammouriH.KaboreP.KinnaertM.A geometric approach to fault detection and isolation for bilinear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2001, 46(9), 1451–1455.
270.
LeuschenM. L.WalkerI. D.CavallaroJ. R.Fault residual generation via nonlinear analytical redundancy. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2005, 13(3), 452–458.
271.
MassoumniaM. A.A geometric approach to the synthesis of failure detection filters. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1986, 31(9), 839–846.
272.
PattonR. J.ChenJ.On eigenstructure assignment for robust fault diagnosis. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2000, 10(14), 1193–1208.
273.
GertlerJ. J.KunwerM. M.Optimal residual decoupling for robust fault diagnosis. Int. J. Control, 1995, 61(2), 395–422.
274.
WatanabeK.HimmelblauD. M.Instrument fault detection in systems with uncertainties. Int. J. Syst. Sci., 1982, 13(2), 137–158.
275.
GaddounaB.MaquinD.RagotJ.Fault detection observers for systems with unknown inputs, 13–16 June 1994Proceedings of the 2nd IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Espoo, Finland.
276.
ChenJ.PattonR. J.ZhangH. Y.Design of unknown input observers and robust fault detection filters. Int. J. Control, 1996, 63(1), 85–105.
277.
ChenW.SaifM.Fault detection and isolation based on novel unknown input observer design, 14–16 June 2006Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Minneapolis, USA, pp. 5129–5134.
278.
KoenigD.Observer design for unknown input nonlinear descriptor systems via convex optimization. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2006, 51(6), 1047–1052.
SeligerR.FrankP. M.Fault-diagnosis by disturbance decoupled nonlinear observers, 11–12 December 1991Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and control, vol. 3, Brighton, UK, pp. 2248–2253.
281.
Martinez-GuerraR.DiopS.Diagnosis of nonlinear systems using an unknown-input observer: An algebraic and differential approach. IEE Proc. Control Theory Applic., 2004, 151(1), 130–135.
282.
BarbotJ. P.BoutatD.FloquetT.An observation algorithm for nonlinear systems with unknown inputs. Automatica, 2009, 45(8), 1970–1974.
283.
HouM.PattonR.An LMI approach to ℋ−/ℋ∞fault detection observers, 2–5 September 1996Proceedings of the UKACC International Conference on Control, Exeter, UK, pp. 305–310.
284.
RankM. L.NiemannH. H.Norm based design of fault detectors. Int. J. Control, 1999, 72(9), 773–783.
285.
HenryD.ZolghadriA.Design and analysis of robust residual generators for systems under feedback control. Automatica, 2005, 41(2), 251–264.
286.
ZhongM.DingS. X.LamJ.WangH.An LMI approach to design robust fault detection filter for uncertain LTI systems. Automatica, 2003, 39(3), 543–550.
287.
StoustrupJ.NiemannH. H.Fault estimation -a standard problem approach. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2002, 12(8), 649–673.
288.
De PersisC.IsidoriA.A geometric approach to nonlinear fault detection and isolation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2001, 46(6), 853–865.
289.
BokorJ.SzabóZ.Fault detection and isolation in nonlinear systems. Ann. Rev. Control, 2009, 33(2), 113–123.
290.
FliessM.JoinC.Sira-RamirezH.Robust residual generation for linear fault diagnosis: An algebraic setting with examples. Int. J. Control, 2004, 77(14), 1223–1242.
291.
BerdjagD.ChristopheC.CocquempotV.JiangB.Nonlinear model decomposition for robust fault detection and isolation using algebraic tools. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inform. Control, 2006, 2(6), 1337–1354.
292.
EdelmayerA.BokorJ.SzaboZ.SzigetiF.Input reconstruction by means of system inversion: A geometric approach to fault detection and isolation in nonlinear systems. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2004, 14(2), 189–200.
293.
EdelmayerA.BokorJ.Szabó Z. Inversion-based residual generation for robust detection and isolation of faults by means of estimation of the inverse dynamics in linear dynamical systems. Int. J. Control, 2009, 82(8), 1526–1538.
294.
HirschornR.Invertibility of multivariable nonlinear control systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1979, 24(6), 855–865.
295.
CampbellS. L.NikoukhahR.Auxiliary signal design for failure detection, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
296.
NiemannH. H.Active fault diagnosis in closed-loop uncertain systems, 30 August–1 September 2006Proceedings of the 6th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection supervision ans safety for technical processes, Beijing, China, pp. 631–636.
297.
AshariA. E.NikoukhahR.CampbellS. L.Feedback in active fault detection, 6–8 July 2009Proceedings of the 15th IFAC Symposium on System identification, St Malo, pp. 192–196.
298.
NiemannH. H.StoustrupJ.Active fault diagnosis by temporary destabilization, 30 August–1 September 2006Proceedings of the 6th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection supervision ans safety for technical processes, Beijing, China, pp. 607–612.
299.
JacobsonC. A.NettC. N.An integrated approach to controls and diagnostics using the four-parameter controller. IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 1991, 11(6), 22–29.
300.
DingS. X.Integrated design of feedback controllers and fault detectors. Ann. Rev. Control, 2009, 33(2), 124–135.
301.
NiemannH. H.StoustrupJ.Robust fault detection in open loop vs. closed loop, 10–12 December 1997Proceedings ofthe 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and control, vol. 5, San Diego, pp. 4496–4497.
302.
BaïkecheH.MarxB.MaquinD.RagotJ.On parametric and nonparametric fault detection in linear closed-loop systems, 16–17 November 2006Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Advanced control and diagnosis, Nancy.
303.
BassevilleM.Information criteria for residual generation and fault detection and isolation. Automatica, 1997, 33(5), 783–803.
BassevilleM.Detecting changes in signals and systems–a survey. Automatica, 1988, 24(3), 309–326.
306.
BenvenisteA.BassevilleM.MoustakidesG.The asymptotic local approach to change detection and model validation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1987, 32(7), 583–592.
307.
BassevilleM.On-board component fault detection and isolation using the statistical local approach. Automatica, 1998, 34(11), 1391–1415.
308.
PukelsheimF.The three sigma rule. Am. Statist., 1994, 48(2), 88–91.
309.
Emami-NaeiniA.AkhterM. M.RockS. M.Effect of model uncertainty on failure detection: the threshold selector. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1988, 33(12), 1106–1115.
310.
DingS. X.ZhangP.FrankP. M.DingE. L.Threshold calculation using LMI-technique and its integration in the design of fault detection systems, 9–12 December 2003Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and control, vol. 1, Maui, USA: IEEE. pp. 469–474.
311.
GossetW. S.The probable error of a mean. Biometrika., 1908, 6(1), 1–25.
312.
NeymanJ.PearsonE. S.On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 1933, 231, 289–337.
313.
WeyerE.SanghoK.CampiM. C.A randomised subsampling method for change detection, 1–3 July 2009Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault detection, supervision and safety of technical processes, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 289–294.
314.
BenedettiniO.BainesT. S.LightfootH. W.GreenoughR. M.State-of-the-art in integrated vehicle health management. Proc. IMechE, Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering, 2009, 223(2), 157–170.
315.
TakatsI. J.ChenowethC. C.Multiple-voting fault detection system forflight critical actuation control systems. US Patent 5,274,554, 1998.
316.
TomlinsonL. R.FreemanR. E.Signal selection and fault detection apparatus and method. US Patent 5,710,776, 1998.
317.
SrJ. M. U.HoodM. B.Method and system for in-flight fault monitoring of flight control actuators. US Patent 6,622,972, 2003.
318.
Beckman-KohlmeierC.KesslerJ.System and method for detecting faults in an aircraft electrical power system. EP Patent 1,501,167, 2005.
319.
RichterM.FleddermannA.Fault-tolerant actuating system for adjusting flaps of an aircraft, comprising adjustment kinematics with a fixed pivot, and a method for monitoring an actuating system. US Patent App. 12/991,174, 2009.
320.
CheriereV.GirioJ. A. D. S.Method and device for fault auto-detection in an on-board system. US Patent App. 12/476,436, 2009.
321.
DurouO.GodetV.ManganeL.PérarnaudD.RoquesR.Hierarchical fault detection, isolation and recovery applied to COF and ATV avionics. Acta Astronaut., 2002, 50(9), 547–556.
322.
CharmeauM. C.BossardF.CarananaA.LamyA.LaurichesseD.CNES R&D studies on autonomous satellites, 18–22 July 2001Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Artificial intelligence and robotics & automation in space, Quebec, Canada.
323.
BarothE.PowersW. T.FoxJ.ProsserB.PallixJ.SchweikardK.. IVHM (Integrated Vehicle Health Management) techniques for future space vehicles, 8–11 July 2001Proceedings of the 37th AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Salt Lake City, USA.
324.
SabatierD.DellandreaB.ChemouilD.FDIR strategy validation with the B method, 27–30 May 2008Proceedings of the International Space System Engineering Conference, Palma de Majorca, Spain.
325.
GuiottoA.MartelliA.PaccagniniC.SMART-FDIR: Use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of a satellite FDIR, 12–14 May 2003Proceedings of the International Space System Engineering Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 71–82.
326.
KatoenJ. P.NollT.Trustworthy aerospace systems. Public Service Rev. Eur. Sci. Technol., 2011, 11, 204–205.
327.
SchwabacherM.SamuelsJ.BrownstonL.The NASA integrated vehicle health management technology experiment for X-37, 1–5 April 2002Proceedings of the SPIE AeroSense 2002 Symposium, Orlando, USA.
328.
FerrelB.LewisM.PerottiJ.OostdykR.GoerzJ.BrownB.Lessons learned on implementing fault detection, isolation and recovery in a ground launch environment, 20–22 April 2010Proceedings of the AIAA Aerospace Conference, Atlanta, USA.
329.
GoupilP.PuyouG.A high fidelity AIRBUS benchmark for system fault detection and isolation and flight control law clearance, 4–8 July 2011Proceedings of the 4th European Conference for Aero-Space Sciences, EUCASS 2011, St-Petersburg, Russia.
330.
FeatherM. S.MarkosianL. Z.Towards certification of a space system application of fault detection and isolation, 6–9 October 2008Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and health management, Denver, USA.
331.
GaoZ.DingS. X.Actuator fault robust estimation and fault-tolerant control for a class of nonlinear descriptor systems. Automatica, 2007, 43(5), 912–920.
332.
MarzatJ.WalterE.Piet-LahanierH.DamongeotF.Automatic tuning via Kriging-based optimization of methods for fault detection and isolation, 6–8 October 2010Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control and fault-tolerant systems, SysTol'10, Nice, France, pp. 505–510.
333.
MarzatJ.WalterE.Piet-LahanierH.Min-max hyperparameter tuning with application to fault detection, 28 August–2 September 2011Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, Milan, Italy, pp. 12904–12909.
